Display options
Share it on

Future Healthc J. 2018 Feb;5(1):25-29. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-1-25.

Medical students and end-of-life decisions: the influence of religion.

Future healthcare journal

Suzie Pomfret, Shaya Mufti, Clive Seale

Affiliations

  1. Imperial NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK.
  2. Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.

PMID: 31098527 PMCID: PMC6510046 DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-1-25

Abstract

The objective of this study was to see if medical students' attitudes about medically assisted dying were influenced by their religious background and current beliefs. A cohort study was conducted using a self-completion study questionnaire in a large UK medical school. In total, 400 out of 505 questionnaires were completed (79%). The study population's characteristics are summarised as follows: mean age 22.7 years (range 18-44); 68.5% believe in god, 31.5% have no belief in god; religious background: Christian 45%, Hindu 16.5%, Muslim 22%, Other 10% and None 7%. The majority of students did not agree with euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the study scenario. Those who had a belief in god were more likely to disagree with actions that hasten death. The findings show this was particularly the case with students from a Muslim background. Gender was not related to overall agreement with actions that hasten death; being older, a finalist and a graduate were weakly associated with a greater likelihood of agreeing with such acts. This is an important issue which warrants further enquiry. The demographics of the UK medical population continue to shift, containing a higher proportion of people from Asia and with Asian British backgrounds than the general population. This study provides us with a basis for further exploration of the potential for disparity between the opinions of the UK population and those of medical workers and trainees, and how that might inform decisions about patient care at the end of life.

Keywords: End-of-life; WORK FORCE; euthanasia; religion

References

  1. Psychosomatics. 1999 May-Jun;40(3):205-11 - PubMed
  2. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2000 Aug 20;120(19):2283-8 - PubMed
  3. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Aug;22(2):657-67 - PubMed
  4. J R Army Med Corps. 2001 Oct;147(3):367-70 - PubMed
  5. J Med Ethics. 2004 Aug;30(4):371-6 - PubMed
  6. Crit Care Med. 1992 May;20(5):683-90 - PubMed
  7. Death Stud. 2006 Jan-Feb;30(1):29-39 - PubMed
  8. Palliat Support Care. 2006 Sep;4(3):251-5 - PubMed
  9. P R Health Sci J. 2006 Dec;25(4):325-9 - PubMed
  10. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Oct;23(10):1608-14 - PubMed
  11. Palliat Med. 2009 Apr;23(3):205-12 - PubMed
  12. J Med Ethics. 2010 Nov;36(11):677-82 - PubMed
  13. BMJ. 2011 May 24;342:d3275 - PubMed
  14. Palliat Med. 2012 Jan;26(1):23-33 - PubMed
  15. Med Educ. 1996 Nov;30(6):428-33 - PubMed
  16. Support Care Cancer. 1998 Jul;6(4):410-5 - PubMed

Publication Types