Display options
Share it on

J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2018 Dec;7(4):173-181. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1637005. Epub 2018 Mar 09.

Long-term Sequelae of Pediatric Neurocritical Care: The Parent Perspective.

Journal of pediatric intensive care

Cydni N Williams, Carl Eriksson, Juan Piantino, Trevor Hall, Danielle Moyer, Aileen Kirby, Cindy McEvoy

Affiliations

  1. Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States.
  2. Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States.
  3. Division of Pediatric Psychology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States.
  4. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States.

PMID: 31073491 PMCID: PMC6506677 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1637005

Abstract

Critical neurologic disease and injury affect thousands of children annually with survivors suffering high rates of chronic morbidities related directly to the illness and to critical care hospitalization. Postintensive care syndrome (PICS) in patients and families encompasses a variety of morbidities including physical, cognitive, emotional, and psychological impairments following critical care. We conducted a focus group study with parents of children surviving pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) for traumatic brain injury, stroke, meningitis, or encephalitis to determine outcomes important to patients and families, identify barriers to care, and identify potential interventions to improve outcomes. Sixteen parents participated in four groups across Oregon. Three global themes were identified: (1) PNCC is an intense emotional experience for the whole family; (2) PNCC survivorship is a chronic illness; and (3) PNCC has a significant psychological and social impact. Survivors and their families suffer physical, emotional, psychological, cognitive, and social impairments for many years after discharge. Parents in this study highlighted the emotional and psychological distress in survivors and families after PNCC, in contrast to most PNCC research focusing on physical outcomes. Several barriers to care were identified with potential implications on survivor outcomes, including limited pediatric resources in rural settings, perceived lack of awareness of PICS among medical providers, and the substantial financial burden on families. Parents desire improved education surrounding PICS morbidities for families and medical providers, improved communication with primary care providers after discharge, access to educational materials for patients and families, direction to mental health providers, and family support groups to assist them in dealing with morbidities and accessing appropriate resources. Clinicians and researchers should consider the parent perspectives reported here when caring for and evaluating outcomes for children requiring PNCC.

Keywords: critical care; patient outcome assessment; pediatric

References

  1. Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;28(7):2616-20 - PubMed
  2. Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;29(3):652-7 - PubMed
  3. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2002 Jun;23(3):133-44 - PubMed
  4. Neurology. 2003 Dec 23;61(12):1779-82 - PubMed
  5. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Aug;30(8):1607-14 - PubMed
  6. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep 1;174(5):538-44 - PubMed
  7. Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):2101-8 - PubMed
  8. J Rural Health. 2007 Spring;23(2):150-7 - PubMed
  9. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007 Jun 2;137(21-22):312-6 - PubMed
  10. Qual Life Res. 2007 Dec;16(10):1567-76 - PubMed
  11. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2007 Nov-Dec;83(6):505-11 - PubMed
  12. Neurocrit Care. 2009;10(1):4-10 - PubMed
  13. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jun;34(6):1076-82 - PubMed
  14. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2008 May 20;2(1):9 - PubMed
  15. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan;10(1):41-4 - PubMed
  16. J Child Health Care. 2009 Jun;13(2):128-49 - PubMed
  17. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov;10(6):636-42 - PubMed
  18. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep;10(5):562-70 - PubMed
  19. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep;11(5):549-55 - PubMed
  20. Neuropsychology. 2010 May;24(3):345-56 - PubMed
  21. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 May;13(3):338-47 - PubMed
  22. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov;12(6):635-42 - PubMed
  23. Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):502-9 - PubMed
  24. Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):618-24 - PubMed
  25. Pediatrics. 2012 Feb;129(2):e254-61 - PubMed
  26. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Jun;60(6):1070-7 - PubMed
  27. Eur J Pediatr. 2013 Jan;172(1):85-90 - PubMed
  28. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;14(1):10-8 - PubMed
  29. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;14(1):e8-15 - PubMed
  30. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;14(2):e85-92 - PubMed
  31. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013 Jun;60(3):709-24 - PubMed
  32. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Oct;14(8):801-10 - PubMed
  33. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov;14(9):835-42 - PubMed
  34. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep;15(7):640-8 - PubMed
  35. Crit Care Med. 2014 Dec;42(12):2518-26 - PubMed
  36. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov;15(9):821-7 - PubMed
  37. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 May;16(4):310-8 - PubMed
  38. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Dec 1;32(23):1849-60 - PubMed
  39. Pediatr Res. 2016 Jan;79(1-2):169-76 - PubMed
  40. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016 Apr;22(2):106-12 - PubMed
  41. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 May;17(5):e247-59 - PubMed
  42. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;4(4):204-211 - PubMed
  43. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2016 Apr-Jun;27(2):204-11 - PubMed
  44. Rehabil Psychol. 2016 May;61(2):179-85 - PubMed
  45. Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):69 - PubMed
  46. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;18(4):330-342 - PubMed
  47. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2017 Nov/Dec;32(6):385-392 - PubMed
  48. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Aug;23(7):529-538 - PubMed
  49. Children (Basel). 2017 Sep 19;4(9):null - PubMed
  50. Arch Dis Child. 1995 Sep;73(3):196-201 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support