Display options
Share it on

Indian J Palliat Care. 2019 Apr-Jun;25(2):190-196. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_46_18.

The Correlation between Respecting the Dignity of Cancer Patients and the Quality of Nurse-Patient Communication.

Indian journal of palliative care

Zoleikha Avestan, Vahid Pakpour, Azad Rahmani, Robab Mohammadian, Amin Soheili

Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
  2. Department of Public Health Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Hematology and Oncology Research Center of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
  3. Department of Nursing, Nursing Faculty, Islamic Azad University, Marageh Branch, Tabriz, Iran.

PMID: 31114102 PMCID: PMC6504734 DOI: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_46_18

Abstract

CONTEXT: Nurse-patient communication is one of the important factors affects the promotion and maintenance of the dignity of cancer patients in the hospital settings.

AIMS: This study aimed to determine the perceptions of cancer patients regarding respecting their dignity and its correlation with nurse-patient communication in the hospital settings.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This correlational study was conducted on 250 cancer patients admitted to the Oncology Departments of Tabriz Shahid Ghazi University Hospital, Iran. These patients were selected using a convenience sampling method. The Patient Dignity Inventory and Nurse Quality of Communication with Patient Questionnaire were used for collecting the data.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied to the data.

RESULTS: The score of nurse-patient relationship is significantly correlated with patient's dignity score (

CONCLUSIONS: Due to the importance of nurse-patient communication on maintenance of the dignity of cancer patients, it is a necessary requirement to take proper actions in this area, particularly by promoting "nurse's communication skills."

Keywords: Cancer patients; dignity; nurse–patient communication; nursing ethics

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. J Adv Nurs. 1999 Apr;29(4):808-18 - PubMed
  2. Eur J Cancer. 1999 Oct;35(10):1415-22 - PubMed
  3. Patient Educ Couns. 2001 Apr;43(1):61-71 - PubMed
  4. Br J Cancer. 2003 Mar 10;88(5):666-71 - PubMed
  5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD003751 - PubMed
  6. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Aug;40(6):609-18 - PubMed
  7. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2004 May;13(2):163-8 - PubMed
  8. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004 Jul 13;31(4):699-709 - PubMed
  9. Cancer Nurs. 1992 Feb;15(1):1-8 - PubMed
  10. Cogn Behav Ther. 2005;34(2):115-23 - PubMed
  11. Psychooncology. 2005 Oct;14(10):831-45; discussion 846-7 - PubMed
  12. Holist Nurs Pract. 2005 Nov-Dec;19(6):285-94 - PubMed
  13. J Palliat Med. 2006 Jun;9(3):666-72 - PubMed
  14. Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jan;64(2):292-302 - PubMed
  15. Age Ageing. 2007 Mar;36(2):197-202 - PubMed
  16. Nurs Philos. 2007 Jan;8(1):28-36 - PubMed
  17. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Nov;34(5):463-71 - PubMed
  18. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007 Nov;34(6):1151-6 - PubMed
  19. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jan;46(1):23-36 - PubMed
  20. J Clin Nurs. 2008 Oct;17(20):2709-17 - PubMed
  21. Psychooncology. 2009 Oct;18(10):1060-8 - PubMed
  22. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Nov;38(5):641-9 - PubMed
  23. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010 Nov;19(6):736-45 - PubMed
  24. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2010 Jan-Feb;138(1-2):79-84 - PubMed
  25. BMJ. 1990 Sep 22;301(6752):575-80 - PubMed
  26. Psychooncology. 2014 Mar;23(3):283-90 - PubMed
  27. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(2):159-66 - PubMed
  28. J Adv Nurs. 1996 Nov;24(5):924-31 - PubMed
  29. Psychooncology. 1998 May-Jun;7(3):207-17 - PubMed

Publication Types