Indian J Palliat Care. 2019 Apr-Jun;25(2):190-196. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_46_18.
The Correlation between Respecting the Dignity of Cancer Patients and the Quality of Nurse-Patient Communication.
Indian journal of palliative care
Zoleikha Avestan, Vahid Pakpour, Azad Rahmani, Robab Mohammadian, Amin Soheili
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
- Department of Public Health Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Hematology and Oncology Research Center of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
- Department of Nursing, Nursing Faculty, Islamic Azad University, Marageh Branch, Tabriz, Iran.
PMID: 31114102
PMCID: PMC6504734 DOI: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_46_18
Abstract
CONTEXT: Nurse-patient communication is one of the important factors affects the promotion and maintenance of the dignity of cancer patients in the hospital settings.
AIMS: This study aimed to determine the perceptions of cancer patients regarding respecting their dignity and its correlation with nurse-patient communication in the hospital settings.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This correlational study was conducted on 250 cancer patients admitted to the Oncology Departments of Tabriz Shahid Ghazi University Hospital, Iran. These patients were selected using a convenience sampling method. The Patient Dignity Inventory and Nurse Quality of Communication with Patient Questionnaire were used for collecting the data.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied to the data.
RESULTS: The score of nurse-patient relationship is significantly correlated with patient's dignity score (
CONCLUSIONS: Due to the importance of nurse-patient communication on maintenance of the dignity of cancer patients, it is a necessary requirement to take proper actions in this area, particularly by promoting "nurse's communication skills."
Keywords: Cancer patients; dignity; nurse–patient communication; nursing ethics
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- J Adv Nurs. 1999 Apr;29(4):808-18 - PubMed
- Eur J Cancer. 1999 Oct;35(10):1415-22 - PubMed
- Patient Educ Couns. 2001 Apr;43(1):61-71 - PubMed
- Br J Cancer. 2003 Mar 10;88(5):666-71 - PubMed
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD003751 - PubMed
- Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Aug;40(6):609-18 - PubMed
- Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2004 May;13(2):163-8 - PubMed
- Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004 Jul 13;31(4):699-709 - PubMed
- Cancer Nurs. 1992 Feb;15(1):1-8 - PubMed
- Cogn Behav Ther. 2005;34(2):115-23 - PubMed
- Psychooncology. 2005 Oct;14(10):831-45; discussion 846-7 - PubMed
- Holist Nurs Pract. 2005 Nov-Dec;19(6):285-94 - PubMed
- J Palliat Med. 2006 Jun;9(3):666-72 - PubMed
- Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jan;64(2):292-302 - PubMed
- Age Ageing. 2007 Mar;36(2):197-202 - PubMed
- Nurs Philos. 2007 Jan;8(1):28-36 - PubMed
- J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Nov;34(5):463-71 - PubMed
- Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007 Nov;34(6):1151-6 - PubMed
- Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jan;46(1):23-36 - PubMed
- J Clin Nurs. 2008 Oct;17(20):2709-17 - PubMed
- Psychooncology. 2009 Oct;18(10):1060-8 - PubMed
- J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Nov;38(5):641-9 - PubMed
- Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010 Nov;19(6):736-45 - PubMed
- Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2010 Jan-Feb;138(1-2):79-84 - PubMed
- BMJ. 1990 Sep 22;301(6752):575-80 - PubMed
- Psychooncology. 2014 Mar;23(3):283-90 - PubMed
- Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(2):159-66 - PubMed
- J Adv Nurs. 1996 Nov;24(5):924-31 - PubMed
- Psychooncology. 1998 May-Jun;7(3):207-17 - PubMed
Publication Types