Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 September/October;34(5):1169–1176. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7400. Epub 2019 May 20.

Short-term performance of implant-supported restorations fitted in general dental practice: A retrospective study.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants

Anna-Luisa Klotz, Larissa Ott, Johannes Krisam, Stephanie Schmitz, Aida Seyidaliyeva, Peter Rammelsberg, Andreas Zenthöfer

PMID: 31107934 DOI: 10.11607/jomi.7400

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the short-term performance of implants and implant-supported dental restorations (single crowns, fixed/removable dental prostheses, and overdentures) and to identify risk factors for prosthetic complications under the conditions of general dental practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: De-identified data extracted from electronic patient records were analyzed to clarify the research question. Patient-related variables and implant- and suprastructure-related variables were documented for each patient. The probability of complication-free survival after 1 and 2 years was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In addition, the prosthetic complications were analyzed using Cox regression models.

RESULTS: Eighty-four patients with 134 healed dental implants supporting 107 restorations were studied over a clinical period of up to 52 months (mean: 23.9 months). Of the implants placed, nine (4.8%) failed during the healing phase. Of the healed implants, peri-implant bone loss occurred for two implants among two patients. Nonetheless, these two implants remained functional. Complications were as follows: peri-implantitis (1.5%), loss of retention (10%), loosening of the abutment screw (6%), and chipping of the veneer material (3.7%). The probability of complication-free survival for suprastructures alone was 92% (95% CI: 86% to 96%) after 1 year and 84% (95% CI: 75% to 90%) after 2 years of clinical service. Taking into consideration all complications/failures of implants and of restorations, complication-free survival was 86% (80% to 91%) and 79% (70% to 85%) after 1 and 2 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Both healed dental implants and implant-supported restorations placed in general practice have a high incidence of success; the survival rates seen during the quite short observation period appear comparable to institutional study outcomes. However, technical prosthetic complications are not uncommon among general practice restorations and probably occur more often than in university studies.

Substances

• Dental Implants

MeSH terms

• Dental Implants*
• Humans
• Peri-Implantitis*
• Retrospective Studies

Publication Types

• Journal Article