Display options
Share it on

J Orthop Case Rep. 2019 Jan-Feb;9(1):94-97. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.1326.

Complications and Outcomes Following Humerus Lengthening - An Illustrative: Case Report.

Journal of orthopaedic case reports

Saktthi Sellayee Shanmuganathan, Jk Giriraj Harshavardhan, Gopinath Menon

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

PMID: 31245330 PMCID: PMC6588133 DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.1326

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Upper limb physeal injuries are dealt with differently simply because they do not hinder with the functional abilities of an individual. Humerus lengthening was first attempted in 1978 after which it encouraged many surgeons to safely perform the procedure. Radial nerve palsy occurring as a complication of humeral lengthening was a major concern.

CASE REPORT: We report a case of a 17-year-old girl with physeal arrest at the proximal physis of the humerus with etiology of post-trauma/post-infection. She presented with a shortening of 8 cm and restricted shoulder movements. We performed a lengthening of the humerus based on the principle of distraction osteogenesis. We used the paediatric limb reconstruction system to distract the corticotomy. However, postoperatively, she developed radial nerve palsy, despite our intraoperative precautionary measures. Distraction was started at 1mm/day. She then showed the progress of radial nerve recovery and full recovery was noted by 5 months post-operatively. The length of the distraction compression assembly had to be changed twice to longer sizes to accommodate the required amount of lengthening. After consolidation of regenerate was confirmed with serial radiographs, external fixator was removed. She was then maintained on a functional brace. We were able to achieve 8cm of lengthening following distraction, and the cosmetic appearance of the patient improved to the patient's and attenders' satisfaction.

CONCLUSION: Humeral lengthening can safely be performed. Careful insertion of the distal pins and performance of the corticotomy will ensure the safety of the radial nerve. Even if radial nerve palsy occurs after all precautions are taken, recovery can be expected.

Keywords: Humerus lengthening; limb reconstruction system LRS; radial nerve palsy

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Nil

References

  1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Apr;178(4):967-72 - PubMed
  2. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005 Sep-Oct;25(5):613-6 - PubMed
  3. Int Orthop. 2008 Jun;32(3):385-8 - PubMed
  4. Int Orthop. 2011 Oct;35(10):1497-502 - PubMed
  5. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93(24):2323-32 - PubMed
  6. HSS J. 2011 Feb;7(1):80-4 - PubMed
  7. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2012 Nov;7(3):177-9 - PubMed
  8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Jan;(250):8-26 - PubMed
  9. Acta Orthop Belg. 2013 Dec;79(6):636-42 - PubMed
  10. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 7;98(17):1490-503 - PubMed
  11. Orthopedics. 2017 Jan 1;40(1):e95-e103 - PubMed
  12. J Child Orthop. 2016 Dec;10(6):585-592 - PubMed
  13. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Sep;37 Suppl 2:S1-S8 - PubMed
  14. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Dec;60(8):1138-9 - PubMed
  15. Skeletal Radiol. 1981;6(4):237-53 - PubMed

Publication Types