Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2019 May 16;10:1127. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01127. eCollection 2019.

Is tDCS an Adjunct Ergogenic Resource for Improving Muscular Strength and Endurance Performance? A Systematic Review.

Frontiers in psychology

Sergio Machado, Petra Jansen, Victor Almeida, Jitka Veldema

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Physical Activity Neuroscience, Physical Activity Sciences Postgraduate Program, Salgado de Oliveira University (UNIVERSO), NiterĂ³i, Brazil.
  2. Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sport Science, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
  3. Helios Klinik Kipfenberg, Kipfenberg, Germany.

PMID: 31156520 PMCID: PMC6532530 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01127

Abstract

Exercise performance is influenced by many physical factors, such as muscle strength and endurance. Particularly in the physical fitness and sports performance contexts, there are many types of ergogenic aids to improve muscular strength and endurance performance, with non-athletes and even athletes using illegal drugs to reach the top. Thus, the development of innovative methods to aid in exercise performance is of great interest. One such method is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). A systematic search was performed on the following databases, until January 2019; PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Pedro database. Studies on tDCS for muscular strength and endurance performance improvement in non-athletes and athletes adults were included. We compared the effect of anodal-tDCS (a-tDCS) to a sham/control condition on the outcomes muscular strength and endurance performance. We found 26 controlled trials. No trial mentions negative side effects of the intervention. The data show differences between the studies investigating muscle strength and the studies evaluating endurance, with regard to successful use of tDCS. Studies investigating the efficiency of tDCS on improving muscular strength demonstrate positive effects of a-tDCS in 66.7% of parameters tested. In contrast, in studies evaluating the effects of a-tDCS on improving endurance performance the a-tDCS revealed a significant improvement in only 50% of parameters assessed. The majority of the data shows consistently influence of a-tDCS on muscular strength, but not to endurance performance. The results of this systematic review suggest that a-tDCS can improve muscular strength, but not to endurance performance.

Keywords: endurance; muscular strength; systematic review; tDCS; transcranial direct current stimulation

References

  1. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3:633-9 - PubMed
  2. Physiol Rev. 2001 Oct;81(4):1725-89 - PubMed
  3. Int J Sports Med. 2003 Nov;24(8):571-5 - PubMed
  4. J Physiol. 2004 May 15;557(Pt 1):175-90 - PubMed
  5. Neurology. 1992 Sep;42(9):1727-32 - PubMed
  6. Br J Sports Med. 2004 Dec;38(6):666-70 - PubMed
  7. Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 15;35(3):1113-24 - PubMed
  8. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:527-65 - PubMed
  9. Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Jul;26(1):242-9 - PubMed
  10. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Jan;102(2):153-63 - PubMed
  11. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Feb;104(2):542-50 - PubMed
  12. Neuroimage. 2008 Aug 1;42(1):169-77 - PubMed
  13. Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jul;196(3):459-65 - PubMed
  14. BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700 - PubMed
  15. Prog Neurobiol. 2010 Oct;92(2):134-50 - PubMed
  16. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Feb;36(1):23-35 - PubMed
  17. Neuroscientist. 2011 Feb;17(1):37-53 - PubMed
  18. Sports Med. 2011 Apr 1;41(4):263-77 - PubMed
  19. Neurosci Lett. 2011 Jun 15;497(1):32-6 - PubMed
  20. Brain Stimul. 2012 Apr;5(2):155-62 - PubMed
  21. Front Physiol. 2012 Apr 11;3:82 - PubMed
  22. Psychophysiology. 2012 Sep;49(9):1242-53 - PubMed
  23. J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Jun;27(6):1699-707 - PubMed
  24. Neuroimage. 2013 Apr 15;70:48-58 - PubMed
  25. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;49(18):1213-8 - PubMed
  26. Sports Med. 2013 Jun;43(6):437-49 - PubMed
  27. J Physiol. 2013 May 15;591(10):2563-78 - PubMed
  28. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76 - PubMed
  29. Front Physiol. 2013 May 13;4:104 - PubMed
  30. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013 Jul;38(7):734-9 - PubMed
  31. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 09;8(12):e81418 - PubMed
  32. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Sep;125(9):1847-58 - PubMed
  33. Brain Stimul. 2014 May-Jun;7(3):468-75 - PubMed
  34. Sports Med. 2014 Sep;44(9):1319-20 - PubMed
  35. Exp Brain Res. 2014 Oct;232(10):3243-52 - PubMed
  36. Sports Med. 2015 Jul;45(7):997-1015 - PubMed
  37. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Dec;126(12):2342-7 - PubMed
  38. J Neurosci. 2015 Jun 10;35(23):8737-44 - PubMed
  39. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Nov;115(11):2311-9 - PubMed
  40. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Feb 15;120(4):464-6 - PubMed
  41. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 16;10(12):e0144916 - PubMed
  42. Neuroscience. 2016 May 13;322:94-103 - PubMed
  43. Nature. 2016 Mar 17;531(7594):283-4 - PubMed
  44. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Nov;48(11):2294-2306 - PubMed
  45. J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Dec;30(12):3381-3387 - PubMed
  46. Brain Sci. 2016 Jul 27;6(3):null - PubMed
  47. Brain Stimul. 2016 Nov - Dec;9(6):842-849 - PubMed
  48. Neuroscience. 2016 Dec 17;339:363-375 - PubMed
  49. Sports Med. 2017 Aug;47(8):1569-1588 - PubMed
  50. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Apr;117(4):665-677 - PubMed
  51. PeerJ. 2017 Mar 2;5:e3028 - PubMed
  52. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Aug;49(8):1677-1687 - PubMed
  53. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Apr 15;:null - PubMed
  54. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 May;32(5):1336-1341 - PubMed
  55. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 May 10;11:243 - PubMed
  56. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jun;12(3):402-407 - PubMed
  57. Neurosci Lett. 2017 Sep 14;657:97-101 - PubMed
  58. Neurosci Lett. 2018 Jan 1;662:12-16 - PubMed
  59. Brain Stimul. 2018 Jan - Feb;11(1):108-117 - PubMed
  60. Cortex. 2017 Dec;97:96-108 - PubMed
  61. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jan 11;:null - PubMed
  62. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Feb 27;:null - PubMed
  63. Brain Stimul. 2019 May - Jun;12(3):668-673 - PubMed
  64. PLoS One. 2019 Feb 6;14(2):e0210873 - PubMed
  65. J Comp Neurol. 1994 Nov 22;349(4):558-82 - PubMed
  66. Sports Med. 1996 Jul;22(1):8-18 - PubMed

Publication Types