Display options
Share it on

J Intell. 2018 Jul 16;6(3). doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6030033.

Inequality, Education, Workforce Preparedness, and Complex Problem Solving.

Journal of Intelligence

Patrick C Kyllonen

Affiliations

  1. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ 08648, USA. [email protected].

PMID: 31162460 PMCID: PMC6480734 DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence6030033

Abstract

Economic inequality has been described as the defining challenge of our time, responsible for a host of potential negative societal and individual outcomes including reduced opportunity, decreased health and life expectancy, and the destabilization of democracy. Education has been proposed as the "great equalizer" that has and can continue to play a role in reducing inequality. One means by which education does so is through the development of complex problem solving skills in students, skills used to solve novel, ill-defined problems in complex, real-world settings. These are highly valued in the workforce and will likely continue to be so in the future workforce. Their importance is evident in results from employer surveys, as well as by their inclusion in large scale international and domestic comparative assessments. In this paper, I review various definitions of complex problem solving and approaches for measuring it, along with findings from PISA 2003, 2012, and 2015. I also discuss prospects for teaching, assessing, and reporting on it, and discuss the emerging importance of collaborative problem solving. Developing and monitoring complex problem solving skills, broadly defined, is a critical challenge in preparing students for the future workforce, and in overcoming the negative effects of inequality and the diminishment of individual opportunity.

Keywords: National Assessment of Educational Progress; PISA; cognitive ability; collaborative problem solving; complex problem solving; general ability; general fluid ability; inequality; problem solving; skills

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 10;109(2):425-30 - PubMed
  2. Psychol Sci. 2013 Dec;24(12):2361-8 - PubMed
  3. Psychol Bull. 2014 Sep;140(5):1332-60 - PubMed
  4. Mol Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;20(1):98-108 - PubMed
  5. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):9-12 - PubMed
  6. Intelligence. 2015 May-Jun;50:1-9 - PubMed
  7. Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 26;7:1424 - PubMed
  8. Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 11;8:1153 - PubMed
  9. Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):2035-2056 - PubMed
  10. Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 10;8:1739 - PubMed
  11. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1988 Mar;117(1):91-5 - PubMed

Publication Types