Display options
Share it on

BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Apr 03;4(2):e001176. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001176. eCollection 2019.

Impact of short-term reconstructive surgical missions: a systematic review.

BMJ global health

Thom C C Hendriks, Matthijs Botman, Charissa N S Rahmee, Johannes C F Ket, Margriet G Mullender, Barend Gerretsen, Emanuel Q Nuwass, Klaas W Marck, Henri A H Winters

Affiliations

  1. Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  2. Global Surgery Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  3. Medical library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  4. Koninklijk Instituut voor de Tropen, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  5. Department of Surgery, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom, Tanzania.
  6. Department of Plastic Surgery, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.

PMID: 31139438 PMCID: PMC6509599 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001176

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Short-term missions providing patients in low-income countries with reconstructive surgery are often criticised because evidence of their value is lacking. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of short-term reconstructive surgical missions in low-income and middle-income countries.

METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched five medical databases from inception up to 2 July 2018. Original studies of short-term reconstructive surgical missions were included, which reported data on patient safety measurements, health gains of individual patients and sustainability. Data were combined to generate overall outcomes, including overall complication rates.

RESULTS: Of 1662 identified studies, 41 met full inclusion criteria, which included 48 546 patients. The overall study quality according to Oxford CEBM and GRADE was low. Ten studies reported a minimum of 6 months' follow-up, showing a follow-up rate of 56.0% and a complication rate of 22.3%. Twelve studies that did not report on duration or follow-up rate reported a complication rate of 1.2%. Fifteen out of 20 studies (75%) that reported on follow-up also reported on sustainable characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the patient outcomes of reconstructive surgical missions is scarce and of limited quality. Higher complication rates were reported in studies which explicitly mentioned the duration and rate of follow-up. Studies with a low follow-up quality might be under-reporting complication rates and overestimating the positive impact of missions. This review indicates that missions should develop towards sustainable partnerships. These partnerships should provide quality aftercare, perform outcome research and build the surgical capacity of local healthcare systems.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018099285.

Keywords: burns; disease; disorder; injury; other infection; public health; surgery; systematic review; treatment

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. BMJ. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1490 - PubMed
  2. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Sep 1;114(3):640-7 - PubMed
  3. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006 Sep;43(5):616-9 - PubMed
  4. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Mar;119(3):1077-90 - PubMed
  5. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007 Jan-Feb;22(1):3-7; discussion 8 - PubMed
  6. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Apr 1;119(4):1267-73; discussion 1274-5 - PubMed
  7. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008 Mar;45(2):163-71 - PubMed
  8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jun 02;8:121 - PubMed
  9. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):39-46 - PubMed
  10. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Aug;67(8):1581-8 - PubMed
  11. BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700 - PubMed
  12. Surgery. 2009 Sep;146(3):435-43 - PubMed
  13. World J Surg. 2010 Mar;34(3):403-10 - PubMed
  14. World J Surg. 2010 Mar;34(3):374-80 - PubMed
  15. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Oct;124(4):1340-8 - PubMed
  16. World J Surg. 2010 Mar;34(3):420-7 - PubMed
  17. Br Dent J. 2010 Feb 27;208(4):179-82 - PubMed
  18. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Dec;63(12):2052-6 - PubMed
  19. Eur J Plast Surg. 2010 Aug;33(4):193-197 - PubMed
  20. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jun;49(4):292-6 - PubMed
  21. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar;127(3):1361-7 - PubMed
  22. PLoS Med. 2010 Nov 30;7(11):e1001006 - PubMed
  23. HEC Forum. 2011 Jun;23(2):79-90 - PubMed
  24. Ann Plast Surg. 2011 Sep;67(3):205-8 - PubMed
  25. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2005 Mar 31;18(1):5-10 - PubMed
  26. J Burn Care Res. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):e120-6 - PubMed
  27. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Feb;129(2):319e-326e - PubMed
  28. World J Surg. 2012 Aug;36(8):1963-9 - PubMed
  29. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 May 29;12:134 - PubMed
  30. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jul;130(1):87e-94e - PubMed
  31. World J Surg. 2012 Dec;36(12):2819-30 - PubMed
  32. World J Surg. 2013 Jul;37(7):1562-70 - PubMed
  33. Plast Surg Int. 2012;2012:892437 - PubMed
  34. PLoS Med. 2013;10(7):e1001477 - PubMed
  35. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Oct;71(10):1742-51 - PubMed
  36. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2013 Aug;33(3):170-5 - PubMed
  37. World J Surg. 2013 Nov;37(11):2507-11 - PubMed
  38. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;42(12):1587-91 - PubMed
  39. World J Surg. 2014 Jan;38(1):252-63 - PubMed
  40. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014 Sep;51(5):553-6 - PubMed
  41. World J Surg. 2015 Jan;39(1):47-53 - PubMed
  42. World J Surg. 2015 Jan;39(1):10-20 - PubMed
  43. J Burn Care Res. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):306-9 - PubMed
  44. Am J Public Health. 2014 Jul;104(7):e38-48 - PubMed
  45. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Sep;67(9):1194-200 - PubMed
  46. J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Sep;25(5):1601-9 - PubMed
  47. Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e334-45 - PubMed
  48. J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Sep;25(5):1685-9 - PubMed
  49. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Apr 07;3(3):e313 - PubMed
  50. BMC Pediatr. 2015 Feb 14;15:8 - PubMed
  51. Anesth Essays Res. 2010 Jul-Dec;4(2):81-4 - PubMed
  52. Lancet. 2015 Aug 8;386(9993):569-624 - PubMed
  53. Minerva Stomatol. 2015 Aug;64(4):203-12 - PubMed
  54. J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jun;26(4):1097-101 - PubMed
  55. J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jun;26(4):1109-11 - PubMed
  56. J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jun;26(4):1112-5 - PubMed
  57. J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jun;26(4):1121-5 - PubMed
  58. J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jun;26(4):1126-8 - PubMed
  59. J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jul;26(5):e426-30 - PubMed
  60. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 15;15:380 - PubMed
  61. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jan;54(1):51-6 - PubMed
  62. World J Surg. 2016 May;40(5):1053-9 - PubMed
  63. Burns. 2016 Mar;42(2):466-70 - PubMed
  64. World J Surg. 2016 Aug;40(8):1823-41 - PubMed
  65. Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Nov;77(5):494-498 - PubMed
  66. World J Surg. 2016 Aug;40(8):1874-84 - PubMed
  67. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017 Sep;54(5):535-539 - PubMed
  68. Int J Public Health. 2017 Jan;62(1):31-42 - PubMed
  69. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Jul;55(6):807-813 - PubMed
  70. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Aug;55(7):977-982 - PubMed
  71. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Feb 8;96(2):268-274 - PubMed
  72. Lancet Glob Health. 2017 May;5(5):e480-e481 - PubMed
  73. Int J Surg. 2017 Jun;42:69-71 - PubMed
  74. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Apr 25;5(4):e1273 - PubMed
  75. BMJ Glob Health. 2016 Dec 8;1(4):e000059 - PubMed
  76. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2017 Mar 31;30(1):47-51 - PubMed
  77. Children (Basel). 2017 Jun 28;4(7): - PubMed
  78. Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1260-1344 - PubMed
  79. World J Surg. 2018 Sep;42(9):3021-3034 - PubMed
  80. J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Jun;29(4):937-942 - PubMed
  81. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Sep;55(8):1145-1152 - PubMed

Publication Types