Display options
Cite
Gariglio M, Dabbou S, Biasato I, et al. Nutritional effects of the dietary inclusion of partially defatted . J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019;10:37doi: 10.1186/s40104-019-0344-7.
Gariglio, M., Dabbou, S., Biasato, I., Capucchio, M. T., Colombino, E., Hernández, F., Madrid, J., Martínez, S., Gai, F., Caimi, C., Oddon, S. B., Meneguz, M., Trocino, A., Vincenzi, R., Gasco, L., & Schiavone, A. (2019). Nutritional effects of the dietary inclusion of partially defatted . Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 1037. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0344-7
Gariglio, Marta, et al. "Nutritional effects of the dietary inclusion of partially defatted ." Journal of animal science and biotechnology vol. 10 (2019): 37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0344-7
Gariglio M, Dabbou S, Biasato I, Capucchio MT, Colombino E, Hernández F, Madrid J, Martínez S, Gai F, Caimi C, Oddon SB, Meneguz M, Trocino A, Vincenzi R, Gasco L, Schiavone A. Nutritional effects of the dietary inclusion of partially defatted . J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019 May 10;10:37. doi: 10.1186/s40104-019-0344-7. eCollection 2019. PMID: 31168367; PMCID: PMC6509755.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019 May 10;10:37. doi: 10.1186/s40104-019-0344-7. eCollection 2019.

Nutritional effects of the dietary inclusion of partially defatted .

Journal of animal science and biotechnology

Marta Gariglio, Sihem Dabbou, Ilaria Biasato, Maria Teresa Capucchio, Elena Colombino, Fuensanta Hernández, Josefa Madrid, Silvia Martínez, Francesco Gai, Christian Caimi, Sara Bellezza Oddon, Marco Meneguz, Angela Trocino, Riccardo Vincenzi, Laura Gasco, Achille Schiavone

Affiliations

  1. 1Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, largo Paolo Braccini 2, Turin, Grugliasco 10095 Italy.
  2. 2Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, largo Paolo Braccini 2, Turin, Grugliasco 10095 Italy.
  3. 3Department of Animal Production, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30071 Murcia, Spain.
  4. 4Institute of Science of Food Production, National Research Council, largo Paolo Braccini 2, Turin, Grugliasco 10095 Italy.
  5. 5Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, viale dell'Università 16, Padua, Legnaro 35020 Italy.
  6. A.I.A. Agricola Italiana Alimentare S.p.A, via Val Pantena 18G, 37142 Verona, Italy.
  7. 7Institute of Interdisciplinary Research on Sustainability, University of Turin, via Accademia Albertina 13, 10100 Turin, Italy.

PMID: 31168367 PMCID: PMC6509755 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-019-0344-7

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present work is aimed at evaluating the effect of different inclusion levels of a partially defatted black soldier fly (

RESULTS: The live weight and average daily gain showed a quadratic response to increasing HI meal in the grower period (minimum corresponding to the HI6 group). No effects of dietary inclusion levels were observed for the daily feed intake or feed conversion ratio. The apparent dry matter and organic matter digestibility were not affected by the dietary treatment. A linear decrease was observed for the crude protein apparent digestibility in the starter period (minimum for the HI9 groups). The ether extract apparent digestibility increased linearly during the grower and finisher periods (minimum for the HI0 group). The morphometric indices were not influenced by the dietary treatments.

CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of up to 9% of HI partially defatted larva meal in the diet of ducks did not cause any effect on growth performance, as well as the apparent digestibility. Moreover, dietary HI inclusion preserved the physiological intestinal development.

Keywords: Black soldier fly; Digestibility; Ducks; Histopathology; Insect; Performance

Conflict of interest statement

The experimental protocol was approved by the Bioethical Committee of the University of Turin (Italy) (protocol number: 380576, 04/12/2017).Not applicable.The authors declare that they have no competi

References

  1. J Econ Entomol. 2002 Feb;95(1):214-20 - PubMed
  2. J Anim Sci. 2004 Jan;82(1):179-83 - PubMed
  3. Poult Sci. 2007 Mar;86(3):488-95 - PubMed
  4. Br Poult Sci. 2007 Oct;48(5):573-9 - PubMed
  5. Poult Sci. 2008 Dec;87(12):2629-35 - PubMed
  6. Zoo Biol. 2007 Mar;26(2):105-15 - PubMed
  7. PLoS One. 2010 Dec 29;5(12):e14445 - PubMed
  8. Poult Sci. 2012 Jan;91(1):265-70 - PubMed
  9. Animal. 2012 Apr;6(4):579-85 - PubMed
  10. Poult Sci. 2013 May;92(5):1221-6 - PubMed
  11. Food Chem. 2011 Sep 15;128(2):400-3 - PubMed
  12. Poult Sci. 2014 Dec;93(12):3053-64 - PubMed
  13. Arch Anim Nutr. 2015;69(4):285-96 - PubMed
  14. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2016 Dec;100(6):1104-1112 - PubMed
  15. J Anim Sci. 2016 Feb;94(2):639-47 - PubMed
  16. Animal. 2016 Dec;10(12):1923-1930 - PubMed
  17. Res Vet Sci. 2017 Dec;115:183-188 - PubMed
  18. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017 Jun 1;8:51 - PubMed
  19. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 27;7(1):6662 - PubMed
  20. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2018 Apr;102(2):e662-e668 - PubMed
  21. Poult Sci. 2018 Feb 1;97(2):540-548 - PubMed
  22. Res Vet Sci. 2018 Apr;117:209-215 - PubMed
  23. Animal. 2018 Oct;12(10):2032-2039 - PubMed
  24. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):1461 - PubMed
  25. Poult Sci. 2018 Apr 1;97(4):1290-1297 - PubMed
  26. J Sci Food Agric. 2018 Dec;98(15):5776-5784 - PubMed
  27. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2018 Jul 9;9:49 - PubMed
  28. Res Vet Sci. 2018 Oct;120:86-93 - PubMed
  29. BMC Vet Res. 2018 Dec 4;14(1):383 - PubMed
  30. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019 Jan 17;10:4 - PubMed
  31. Poult Sci. 1983 Oct;62(10):2106-8 - PubMed
  32. J Lipid Res. 1982 Sep;23(7):1072-5 - PubMed

Publication Types