PeerJ. 2019 Jul 01;7:e7172. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7172. eCollection 2019.
Radiation dose-response (a Bayesian model) in the radiotherapy of the localized prostatic adenocarcinoma: the reliability of PSA slope changes as a response surrogate endpoint.
PeerJ
Reza Ali Mohammadpour, Jamshid Yazdani-Charati, SZahra Faghani, Ahad Alizadeh, Mohammadreza Barzegartahamtan
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
- Department of Epidemiology and Reproductive Health, Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
PMID: 31304057
PMCID: PMC6610535 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7172
Abstract
PURPOSE: One of the characteristics of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) is PSA slope. It is the rate of diminishing PSA marker over time after radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer (PC) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between increasing RT doses and PSA slope as a potential surrogate for PC recurrence.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on PC patients who were treated by radiotherapy in the Cancer Institute of Iran during 2007-2012. By reviewing the records of these patients, the baseline PSA measurement before treatment (iPSA), Gleason score (GS), clinical T stage (T. stage), and periodic PSA measurements after RT and the total radiation dose received were extracted for each patient separately. We used a Bayesian dose-response model, analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, Kaplan-Meier product-limit method for analysis. Probability values less 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Based on the D'Amico risk assessment system, 13.34% of patients were classified as "Low Risk", 51.79% were "Intermediate Risk", and 34.87% were "High Risk". In terms of radiation doses, 12.31% of the patients received fewer than 50 Gy, 15.38% received 50 to 69 Gy, 61.03% received 70 Gy, and 11.28% received more than 70 Gy. The PSA values decreased after RT for all dose levels. The slope of PSA changes was negative for 176 of 195 patients. By increasing the dosage of radiation, the PSA decreased but these changes were not statistically significant (
CONCLUSION: Significant changes in the dose-response relationship were not observed when the PSA slope was considered as the response criterion. Therefore, although the absolute value of the PSA decreased with increasing doses of RT, the relationship between PSA slope changes and increasing doses was not clear and cannot be used as a reliable response surrogate endpoint.
Keywords: Bayesian dose-response; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen slope; Radiotherapy
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare there are no competing interests.
References
- Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Dec;5(12):4119-25 - PubMed
- Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Aug 1;53(5):1097-105 - PubMed
- Control Clin Trials. 2002 Dec;23(6):607-25 - PubMed
- Control Clin Trials. 2002 Dec;23(6):626-34 - PubMed
- Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jul 15;56(4):1073-8 - PubMed
- J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Sep 17;95(18):1376-83 - PubMed
- J Clin Oncol. 1992 Aug;10(8):1208-17 - PubMed
- J Urol. 2004 Mar;171(3):1132-6 - PubMed
- JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1233-9 - PubMed
- J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 1;24(13):1990-6 - PubMed
- Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Nov 15;66(4):1064-71 - PubMed
- Cancer. 1991 Jul 15;68(2):400-5 - PubMed
- Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):67-74 - PubMed
- J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 10;25(35):5673-4; author reply 5674 - PubMed
- Ann Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;18(4):270-82 - PubMed
- Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Nov 15;72(4):980-8 - PubMed
- Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Nov 1;72(3):782-91 - PubMed
- Radiother Oncol. 2009 Nov;93(2):226-33 - PubMed
- Eur Urol. 2011 Dec;60(6):1133-9 - PubMed
- Cancer. 2012 Mar 15;118(6):1533-42 - PubMed
- Eur Urol. 2012 Jan;61(1):112-27 - PubMed
- Can Urol Assoc J. 2012 Apr;6(2):121-7 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2013 Jan 29;346:f325 - PubMed
- Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Apr;42(2):627-34 - PubMed
- J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 1;31(31):3944-50 - PubMed
- Rev Urol. 2013;15(3):97-107 - PubMed
- Radiat Oncol. 2013 Nov 27;8:276 - PubMed
- Radiat Oncol. 2014 Feb 02;9:42 - PubMed
- Radiat Oncol. 2014 Feb 05;9:47 - PubMed
- Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(15):6121-5 - PubMed
- Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015 Mar;18(1):49-55 - PubMed
- Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(7):2601-11 - PubMed
- Radiat Oncol. 2015 May 21;10:115 - PubMed
- Ann Oncol. 2015 Oct;26(10):2012-6 - PubMed
- Stat Med. 1989 Apr;8(4):431-40 - PubMed
- J Clin Oncol. 1994 Jul;12(7):1402-7 - PubMed
- Cancer. 1993 Aug 1;72(3):832-42 - PubMed
- Radiother Oncol. 1997 Sep;44(3):213-21 - PubMed
- JAMA. 1998 Sep 16;280(11):969-74 - PubMed
Publication Types