Display options
Share it on

Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Jun 27;15:100400. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100400. eCollection 2019 Sep.

Protocol for evaluating a workplace intervention within the framework of consultations for suffering at work in French-speaking Switzerland.

Contemporary clinical trials communications

Z Mediouni, C Barlet-Ghaleb, M Zenoni, M Rinaldo, D Grolimund Berset, S Eich, B Danuser, P Krief

Affiliations

  1. Department Health Work Environment, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 2 Route de la Corniche, CH-1066, Epalinges-Lausanne, Switzerland.

PMID: 31312747 PMCID: PMC6609781 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100400

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Psychosocial suffering involves diverse human, social and economic costs. Some 34.4% of workers in Switzerland report chronic stress related to their jobs. Medical consultations for suffering at work aim to maintain-or renew-patients' abilities to make decisions and act following a diagnosis of psychological suffering related to their work; they also aim to help workers return to their workstations or remain there. Workplace interventions by consulting occupational physicians can go beyond the subjective issues: they can be offered to employees, in anticipation of a return to work when this appears feasible from the outset.

OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively evaluate perceptions of workplace interventions and identify their effects by collecting the verbatim statements of employees and their employers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Qualitative single-centre study of workplace interventions conducted by the Consultation Service for Suffering at Work's occupational physicians for patients seen between January 2015 to December 2017. Nineteen workplace interventions took place, out of 184 different consultations. The verbatim statements of employees and their employers will be collected over a variable timeframe, using semi-structured face-to-face interviews. These will then be recorded, transcribed and analysed. Fourteen patients refused the workplace intervention. Their professional path will be collected for comparison and exploratory purposes.

CONCLUSION: This exploratory research project will provide a better understanding of the issues surrounding work-related psychological suffering and of which strategies support patients most effectively.

Keywords: Consultation evaluation; Mental health; Occupational health; Research protocol; Workplace intervention

References

  1. Int J Health Serv. 1999;29(4):871-93 - PubMed
  2. Health Serv Res. 2000 Apr;35(1 Pt 1):77-100 - PubMed
  3. J Psychosom Res. 2001 Nov;51(5):697-704 - PubMed
  4. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2007 Nov;81(2):151-7 - PubMed
  5. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008 Oct;34(5):323-5 - PubMed
  6. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jan 12;169(1):56-61 - PubMed
  7. Ind Health. 2014;52(3):216-24 - PubMed
  8. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 08;(4):CD010306 - PubMed
  9. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0133750 - PubMed
  10. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Jan;7(1):1-14 - PubMed
  11. Eur J Public Health. 2016 Jun;26(3):470-7 - PubMed
  12. Occup Environ Med. 2017 Mar;74(4):301-310 - PubMed
  13. Epidemiology. 2017 Jul;28(4):619-626 - PubMed
  14. Sante Ment Que. 2017 Fall;42(2):197-218 - PubMed
  15. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 25;15(10): - PubMed
  16. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2019 Apr 3;32(2):229-244 - PubMed

Publication Types