Display options
Share it on

Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2019 Jul 17;83(3). doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00018-19. Print 2019 Aug 21.

Does Gender Bias Still Affect Women in Science?.

Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR

Rachel L Roper

Affiliations

  1. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA [email protected].

PMID: 31315903 PMCID: PMC6710458 DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00018-19

Abstract

The percentage of women employed in professional scientific positions has been low but is increasing over time. The U.S. National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation have both implemented programs to improve women's participation in science, and many universities and companies have diversity and equity programs. While most faculty and scientists believe that they are fair and unbiased, numerous well-designed studies published in leading peer-reviewed journals show that gender bias in sciences and medicine is widespread and persistent today in both faculty and students. Recent studies show that gender bias affects student grading, professional hiring, mentoring, tenure, promotion, respect, grant proposal success, and pay. In addition, sexual harassment remains a significant barrier. Fortunately, several studies provide evidence that programs that raise conscious awareness of gender bias can improve equity in science, and there are a number of recommendations and strategies for improving the participation of women.

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

Keywords: STEM; bias; gender; medicine; science; women

References

  1. J Appl Psychol. 2004 Jun;89(3):416-27 - PubMed
  2. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jul;101(1):109-28 - PubMed
  3. JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2410-7 - PubMed
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 9;109(41):16474-9 - PubMed
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 25;111(12):4403-8 - PubMed
  6. Acad Med. 2015 Feb;90(2):221-30 - PubMed
  7. J Appl Psychol. 2015 Nov;100(6):1678-712 - PubMed
  8. Science. 2015 May 8;348(6235):611 - PubMed
  9. JAMA. 2015 Sep 15;314(11):1175-7 - PubMed
  10. Acad Med. 2016 Aug;91(8):1143-50 - PubMed
  11. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 10;11(2):e0148405 - PubMed
  12. Bioscience. 2015 Nov 1;65(11):1084-1087 - PubMed
  13. JAMA. 2016 May 17;315(19):2120-1 - PubMed
  14. Acad Med. 2016 Aug;91(8):1050-2 - PubMed
  15. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Sep 1;176(9):1294-304 - PubMed
  16. Science. 2017 Jan 27;355(6323):389-391 - PubMed
  17. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 May;26(5):413-419 - PubMed
  18. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2017 Nov;73:211-215 - PubMed
  19. CMAJ. 2018 Apr 23;190(16):E489-E499 - PubMed
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 31;115(31):7943-7948 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types