Display options
Share it on

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 May 13;3:100046. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100046. eCollection 2019 Jul.

Clinical pregnancy following GnRH agonist administration in the luteal phase of fresh or frozen assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X

Le Thi Minh Chau, Duong Khue Tu, Philippe Lehert, Do Van Dung, Le Quang Thanh, Vo Minh Tuan

Affiliations

  1. Department of Infertility, Tu Du hospital, Vietnam.
  2. Faculty of Medicine, the University of Melbourne, Australia.
  3. Faculty of Economics, UCL Mons, Louvain, Belgium.
  4. University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
  5. Tu Du hospital, Vietnam.

PMID: 31403130 PMCID: PMC6687475 DOI: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100046

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study if the GnRH agonist administration in luteal phase improves clinical pregnancy rate of fresh and frozen embryo transfer. Also, this meta-analysis compares the treatment effect of luteal GnRH agonist administration between long agonist and antagonist protocols of fresh cycles, and between two types of treatment: fresh and frozen embryo transfers.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis (registration number CRD42017059152).

RESULTS: For the overall 20 studies (5497 patients), clinical pregnancy rate significantly increased in group of GnRH agonist administration compared to control group (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.14-1.34, p < 0.0001). Regarding the treatment effect of luteal GnRH agonist administration between long agonist and antagonist protocol fresh cycles, no significant difference was observed (RR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.98-1.67, p = 0.07). Also, in comparison between fresh and frozen embryo transfer, similar effect of GnRH agonist administration was found (RR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.74-1.16, p = 0.49).

CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that GnRH agonist administration in luteal phase improve clinical pregnancy rate in both fresh and frozen cycles. Within fresh cycles, no significant difference of clinical pregnancy rate is found between two protocols. In frozen cycles, the effect of GnRH agonist administration in enhancing clinical pregnancy rate is similar to fresh cycles.

References

  1. PLoS One. 2017 Apr 24;12(4):e0175985 - PubMed
  2. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018 Oct;47(8):391-395 - PubMed
  3. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990 Feb;70(2):421-30 - PubMed
  4. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Nov;182:66-70 - PubMed
  5. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19 Suppl 4:4331 - PubMed
  6. Fertil Steril. 2011 Aug;96(2):344-8 - PubMed
  7. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2008 Mar;11(1):43-7 - PubMed
  8. Fertil Steril. 2015 Apr;103(4):879-85 - PubMed
  9. Hum Reprod. 2008 Mar;23(3):668-73 - PubMed
  10. Hum Reprod. 2004 May;19(5):1176-80 - PubMed
  11. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 07;(7):CD009154 - PubMed
  12. Iran J Reprod Med. 2015 Aug;13(8):483-8 - PubMed
  13. J Reprod Med. 2007 Jul;52(7):639-44 - PubMed
  14. Arch Dis Child. 2008 Aug;93(8):710-3 - PubMed
  15. Endocr Rev. 2006 Apr;27(2):170-207 - PubMed
  16. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010 Sep 08;8:107 - PubMed
  17. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 29;4:CD001750 - PubMed
  18. Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):734-40 - PubMed
  19. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016 Dec;32(12):961-964 - PubMed
  20. Biol Reprod. 1998 Sep;59(3):661-9 - PubMed
  21. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 23;1:CD012103 - PubMed
  22. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;47(2):144-51 - PubMed
  23. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Jul;14(5):236-42 - PubMed
  24. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;48(3):245-8 - PubMed
  25. Hum Reprod. 2016 Jun;31(6):1253-64 - PubMed
  26. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017 Jan 10;15(1):6 - PubMed
  27. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Jul;35(7):618-622 - PubMed
  28. Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Nov-Dec;20(6):808-21 - PubMed
  29. Hum Reprod. 2006 Oct;21(10):2572-9 - PubMed
  30. Hum Reprod. 2001 Aug;16(8):1671-5 - PubMed
  31. Reprod Sci. 2007 Dec;14(8):737-49 - PubMed
  32. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Jul;87(7):3300-8 - PubMed
  33. BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928 - PubMed
  34. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Oct;19(4):472-7 - PubMed
  35. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Feb;84(2):636-42 - PubMed
  36. J Reprod Infertil. 2015 Apr-Jun;16(2):96-101 - PubMed
  37. Reprod Biol. 2017 Mar;17(1):1-8 - PubMed
  38. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Oct;85(10):3919-24 - PubMed
  39. Hum Reprod. 2016 Aug;31(8):1638-52 - PubMed
  40. Hum Reprod. 2001 Apr;16(4):663-7 - PubMed
  41. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2015;42(4):429-30 - PubMed
  42. Med J Aust. 2017 Aug 7;207(3):114-118 - PubMed
  43. Fertil Steril. 2008 Apr;89(4):749-58 - PubMed
  44. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Jan;30(1):52-6 - PubMed
  45. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2012 Sep;5(3):279-84 - PubMed
  46. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2015 Nov;43(11):728-34 - PubMed
  47. Fertil Steril. 2015 May;103(5):1190-3 - PubMed
  48. Hum Reprod. 2005 Jul;20(7):1798-804 - PubMed

Publication Types