Display options
Share it on

J Diabetes Metab Disord Control. 2018;5(4):113-117. doi: 10.15406/jdmdc.2018.05.00148. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

Importance of fasting blood glucose goals in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review of the literature and a critical appraisal.

Journal of diabetes, metabolic disorders & control

Chandler J Tayek, Lavanya Cherukuri, Sajad Hamal, John A Tayek

Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Los Angeles Bio-Medical Research Institute, USA.

PMID: 31404422 PMCID: PMC6688759 DOI: 10.15406/jdmdc.2018.05.00148

Abstract

Prandial insulin has been essential for the improved management of the type 1 diabetic patient. Interestingly, many studies have evaluated the addition of prandial insulin to the type 2 diabetic patients with improved control. The greatest drop in A1c with the use of various type of prandial insulins have resulted in the decrease of 1.3% in the A1c measurement. Interestingly, none of the published trials with goal of fasting blood glucose (FBG) have ever obtained the goal A1c. Since a drop in FBG of 28.7mg/dl is equal to a 1% drop in A1c, a simple approach to obtain a target A1c would be to focus on the FBG (per ADA: Average Blood Glucose = A1c (%) x 28.7 - 46.7mg/d). However, average blood glucose requires multiple measurements and may be less accurate then using just a FBG. Since prandial insulin clinical trials have only demonstrated a drop in A1c by 0.3-1.3% the use of only a FBG to help patients get to goal may be easier to teach and to obtain. It might save time and money. Our hypothesis is that if patient obtain a FBG <100 mg/dl for 2-3 months then 70% will be at an A1c goal <7.0%. After a few months of good fasting glucose control the provider can use this equation (FBG+80)/30 to estimate A1c. For example, a FBG of 130mg/dl would be (130 + 80)/30 = 7.0%; or a FBG of 190 would be (190+80)/30 =eA1c 9% (estimate of A1c). While type 1 diabetes has a very complex daily glucose pattern, the approach to type 2 diabetics on insulin could become simplified.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest Author declares there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1976 Feb;42(2):222-9 - PubMed
  2. N Engl J Med. 1992 Nov 12;327(20):1426-33 - PubMed
  3. Diabetes Care. 2005 Feb;28(2):260-5 - PubMed
  4. Clin Ther. 2004 Dec;26(12):2034-44 - PubMed
  5. J Diabetes Complications. 2006 May-Jun;20(3):145-52 - PubMed
  6. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2006 Jul;8(4):448-55 - PubMed
  7. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2006 Oct;114(9):527-32 - PubMed
  8. N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 25;357(17):1716-30 - PubMed
  9. Diabetes Care. 2009 Jun;32(6):1007-13 - PubMed
  10. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009 Jun;11(6):623-31 - PubMed
  11. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Dec;25(12):2887-94 - PubMed
  12. Diabetes Care. 2011 Feb;34(2):249-55 - PubMed
  13. Endocr Pract. 2011 May-Jun;17(3):395-403 - PubMed
  14. Endocr Pract. 2011 Sep-Oct;17(5):727-36 - PubMed
  15. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011 Nov;13(11):1020-7 - PubMed
  16. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012 Feb;166(2):159-70 - PubMed
  17. Lancet. 2012 Jun 16;379(9833):2262-9 - PubMed
  18. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Aug;15(8):729-36 - PubMed
  19. Diabetes Care. 2015 Jul;38(7):1218-27 - PubMed
  20. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 May 05;4(5):null - PubMed
  21. Lancet. 2015 May 23;385(9982):2057-66 - PubMed
  22. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):939-47 - PubMed
  23. JAMA. 2017 Jul 4;318(1):45-56 - PubMed
  24. JAMA. 2017 Oct 17;318(15):1460-1470 - PubMed
  25. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;138:253-261 - PubMed
  26. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Apr 17;168(8):569-576 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support