Display options
Share it on

Cureus. 2019 May 21;11(5):e4698. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4698.

Critical Care Utilization in Patients with Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Stroke, and Gastrointestinal Bleed: Two Hospitals Experience.

Cureus

Mohd Amer Alsamman, Samer Alsamman, Abdelmoniem Moustafa, Mohammad S Khan, Jenni Steinbrunner, Helen Koselka

Affiliations

  1. Hospital Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA.
  2. Pulmonary / Critical Care, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, USA.
  3. Hospital Medicine, Miriam Hospital, Providence, USA.
  4. Biostatistics, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, USA.
  5. Internal Medicine, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, USA.

PMID: 31355060 PMCID: PMC6649872 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.4698

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Intensive Care Units (ICUs) are among the most expensive components of hospital care. Experts believe that ICUs are overused; however, hospitals vary in their ICU admission rate. Our hypothesis is based on clinical observations that many patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), stroke, and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding admitted to the ICU don't really need it and could be managed safely in a non-ICU level of care. Reducing inappropriate admissions would reduce healthcare costs and improve outcomes. Our primary objective was to determine the frequency of inappropriate ICU admissions. Secondary objectives were to evaluate which diagnoses were more unnecessarily admitted to the ICU, evaluate different variables and comorbidities, and determine the mortality rates during ICU admissions.

METHODS:  Patients admitted to the ICU, from the Emergency Department (ED) or transferred from the floor, during a one-year period were evaluated in this retrospective study. Patients 18-years old and above who had an admitting diagnosis of DKA, GI bleed, ischemic stroke, or hemorrhagic stroke were included. Patients in a comatose state, intubated, on vasopressors, hemodynamically unstable or had an unstable comorbid disease, subarachnoid hemorrhage, surgery during hospitalization prior to the ICU admission were excluded. Patients were categorized as having an appropriate or inappropriate ICU admission based on our institutional ICU admission criteria and data from available literature and guidelines.

RESULTS: A total of 95 patients were included in our cohort. Seventy-two out of 95 (76%) were considered as inappropriate ICU admissions. When comparing each of the four admitting diagnoses, a significantly higher proportion of DKA patients were considered inappropriate ICU admissions when compared to the other diagnoses (

CONCLUSIONS:  More than three-quarters of our study population was admitted to the ICU inappropriately. Incorporating severity scores in ICU admission criteria could improve the appropriateness of ICU admission and financial feasibility. This article is based on a poster: Alsamman S, Alsamman MA, Castro M, Koselka H, Steinbrunner J: ICU admission patterns in patients with DKA, stroke and GI bleed: do they all need ICU? J Hosp Med. March 2015.

Keywords: health care cost; icu admission criteria; icu stay

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

  1. Crit Care Med. 1999 Mar;27(3):633-8 - PubMed
  2. BMJ. 1999 Jun 5;318(7197):1544-7 - PubMed
  3. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Dec;26(12):1779-85 - PubMed
  4. Stroke. 2001 Apr;32(4):871-6 - PubMed
  5. Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Nov;54(11):2523-9 - PubMed
  6. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2010 Sep-Oct;56(5):528-34 - PubMed
  7. Crit Care Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):2009-15 - PubMed
  8. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Sep 10;172(16):1220-6 - PubMed
  9. Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct;47(5):2060-80 - PubMed
  10. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 May;20(5):479-86 - PubMed
  11. Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug;44(8):1553-602 - PubMed

Publication Types