Display options
Share it on

CMAJ Open. 2019 Aug 20;7(3):E524-E536. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180191. Print 2019.

Impact of school vaccination mandates on pediatric vaccination coverage: a systematic review.

CMAJ open

Devon Greyson, Chris Vriesema-Magnuson, Julie A Bettinger

Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication (Greyson), University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Greyson, Bettinger), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Greyson, Bettinger) and School of Library, Archival and Information Studies (Vriesema-Magnuson), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC [email protected].
  2. Department of Communication (Greyson), University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Greyson, Bettinger), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Greyson, Bettinger) and School of Library, Archival and Information Studies (Vriesema-Magnuson), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.

PMID: 31431485 PMCID: PMC6703989 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20180191

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mandated vaccination for school attendance is a growing strategy internationally. Our aim was to investigate the effects of implementing school vaccination mandates on pediatric population vaccine coverage.

METHODS: In this systematic review, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) and the PAIS Index for empirical studies of implementation of a primary or secondary school vaccination requirement published in any language through March 2019 with vaccination rates as an outcome. We sought additional studies by consulting experts, reference lists and grey literature sources. Included studies were too heterogeneous for meta-analysis; thus, we extracted data using a standardized rubric and synthesized the results narratively.

RESULTS: Among the 4232 citations obtained, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen were conducted with US data, 1 with Italian data, and 1 with Australian data. Four studies examined school-entry mandates, and 16 examined adolescent requirements. An uncontrolled before-after design was used in 10 studies, cross-sectional analysis in 7, a retrospective cohort design in 2, and a prospective cohort in 1. In many cases, increased documentation of coverage followed the addition of new requirements. The exception to this was human papillomavirus vaccination mandates, which were highly controversial, in the United States. The studies contained notable risks of bias, with cointerventions rarely acknowledged or accounted for, and subpopulations often excluded. A substantial risk of ecological fallacy existed for most studies.

INTERPRETATION: Vaccination mandates appear largely associated with increased vaccination coverage, but it is not possible to attribute causality to the mandate in most studies. High-quality implementation research that uses whole-population coverage data and takes into consideration cointerventions, confounders, clustering of unvaccinated populations and context is required.

Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Devon Greyson reports grants from the British Columbia Immunization Committee during the conduct of the study. No other competing interests were declared.

References

  1. J Adolesc Health. 2004 May;34(5):420-3 - PubMed
  2. Am J Public Health. 2004 Jun;94(6):978-84 - PubMed
  3. Vaccine. 2005 Apr 27;23(23):3053-60 - PubMed
  4. J Adolesc Health. 2005 Dec;37(6):511-6 - PubMed
  5. Lancet. 2006 Feb 4;367(9508):436-42 - PubMed
  6. JAMA. 2006 Oct 11;296(14):1757-63 - PubMed
  7. Evid Based Dent. 2006;7(4):108 - PubMed
  8. Am J Prev Med. 2007 Mar;32(3):194-201 - PubMed
  9. J Adolesc Health. 2007 May;40(5):405-11 - PubMed
  10. Pediatrics. 2008 Mar;121(3):e547-52 - PubMed
  11. Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50 - PubMed
  12. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100 - PubMed
  13. Am J Public Health. 2010 Sep;100(9):1635-40 - PubMed
  14. Pediatrics. 2012 Jun;129(6):1056-63 - PubMed
  15. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 20;367(12):1170-1 - PubMed
  16. Public Health Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;128(1):37-45 - PubMed
  17. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jul;32(7):1282-90 - PubMed
  18. Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):371-7 - PubMed
  19. J Sch Nurs. 2014 Oct;30(5):332-9 - PubMed
  20. Am J Public Health. 2014 Aug;104(8):1526-33 - PubMed
  21. BMJ. 2014 May 02;348:g2979 - PubMed
  22. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Apr;169(4):303-4 - PubMed
  23. JAMA. 2015 Mar 17;313(11):1099-100 - PubMed
  24. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jun;50(6):797-808 - PubMed
  25. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;214(6):752.e1-6 - PubMed
  26. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6 - PubMed
  27. J Infect. 2016 Jun;72(6):659-666 - PubMed
  28. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Jun 2;12(6):1615-22 - PubMed
  29. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Mar;26(3):266-275 - PubMed
  30. BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919 - PubMed
  31. Pediatrics. 2016 Dec;138(6): - PubMed
  32. Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Jun 09;27:103 - PubMed
  33. Pediatrics. 2018 Jan;141(1): - PubMed
  34. Euro Surveill. 2018 May;23(22):null - PubMed
  35. Am J Public Health. 2018 Oct;108(10):1421-1423 - PubMed
  36. Vaccine. 2018 Sep 18;36(39):5811-5818 - PubMed
  37. Vaccine. 2018 Nov 19;36(48):7377-7384 - PubMed
  38. Health Serv Rep. 1972 May;87(5):461-6 - PubMed
  39. Aust J Public Health. 1994 Sep;18(3):267-73 - PubMed

Publication Types