Display options
Cite
Niskanen J, Fondell M, Sahle CJ, et al. Reply to Pettersson et al.: Why X-ray spectral features are compatible to continuous distribution models in ambient water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(35):17158-17159doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909551116.
Niskanen, J., Fondell, M., Sahle, C. J., Eckert, S., Jay, R. M., Gilmore, K., Pietzsch, A., Dantz, M., Lu, X., McNally, D. E., Schmitt, T., Vaz da Cruz, V., Kimberg, V., Gel'mukhanov, F., & Föhlisch, A. (2019). Reply to Pettersson et al.: Why X-ray spectral features are compatible to continuous distribution models in ambient water. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(35), 17158-17159. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909551116
Niskanen, Johannes, et al. "Reply to Pettersson et al.: Why X-ray spectral features are compatible to continuous distribution models in ambient water." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America vol. 116,35 (2019): 17158-17159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909551116
Niskanen J, Fondell M, Sahle CJ, Eckert S, Jay RM, Gilmore K, Pietzsch A, Dantz M, Lu X, McNally DE, Schmitt T, Vaz da Cruz V, Kimberg V, Gel'mukhanov F, Föhlisch A. Reply to Pettersson et al.: Why X-ray spectral features are compatible to continuous distribution models in ambient water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 27;116(35):17158-17159. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909551116. Epub 2019 Aug 20. PMID: 31431526; PMCID: PMC6717301.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 27;116(35):17158-17159. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909551116. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

Reply to Pettersson et al.: Why X-ray spectral features are compatible to continuous distribution models in ambient water.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Johannes Niskanen, Mattis Fondell, Christoph J Sahle, Sebastian Eckert, Raphael M Jay, Keith Gilmore, Annette Pietzsch, Marcus Dantz, Xingye Lu, Daniel E McNally, Thorsten Schmitt, Vinicius Vaz da Cruz, Victor Kimberg, Faris Gel'mukhanov, Alexander Föhlisch

Affiliations

  1. Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Institute for Methods and Instrumentation for Synchrotron Radiation Research, D-12489 Berlin, Germany.
  2. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turun Yliopisto, Finland.
  3. European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, F-38043 Grenoble, France.
  4. Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.
  5. Swiss Light Source, Photon Science Division, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
  6. Theoretical Chemistry and Biology, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
  7. Institute of Nanotechnology, Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemistry, Siberian Federal University, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
  8. Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Institute for Methods and Instrumentation for Synchrotron Radiation Research, D-12489 Berlin, Germany; [email protected].

PMID: 31431526 PMCID: PMC6717301 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1909551116

[No abstract available.]

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. J Chem Phys. 2007 Nov 7;127(17):174504 - PubMed
  2. J Phys Chem A. 2009 Jul 23;113(29):8176-81 - PubMed
  3. Phys Rev Lett. 2011 Jan 21;106(3):037801 - PubMed
  4. Nat Commun. 2014 Apr 02;5:3556 - PubMed
  5. J Phys Chem Lett. 2017 Nov 16;8(22):5487-5491 - PubMed
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 19;:null - PubMed
  7. Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 4;10(1):1013 - PubMed
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 27;116(35):17156-17157 - PubMed
  9. Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1987 Jul 15;36(2):1361-1364 - PubMed

Publication Types