Display options
Cite
Gomes LSM. Early Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip-Current Status, Advances, and Perspectives. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019;54(4):368-376doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693138.
Gomes, L. S. M. (2019). Early Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip-Current Status, Advances, and Perspectives. Revista brasileira de ortopedia, 54(4), 368-376. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1693138
Gomes, Luiz Sérgio Marcelino. "Early Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip-Current Status, Advances, and Perspectives." Revista brasileira de ortopedia vol. 54,4 (2019): 368-376. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1693138
Gomes LSM. Early Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip-Current Status, Advances, and Perspectives. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019 Jul;54(4):368-376. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693138. Epub 2019 Aug 20. PMID: 31435100; PMCID: PMC6701967.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019 Jul;54(4):368-376. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693138. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

Early Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip-Current Status, Advances, and Perspectives.

Revista brasileira de ortopedia

Luiz Sérgio Marcelino Gomes

Affiliations

  1. Faculdade de Medicina de Uberaba, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, Brasil.
  2. Centro de Estudos do Serviço de Cirurgia e Reabilitação Ortopédico-Traumatológica de Batatais, Batatais, SP, Brasil.

PMID: 31435100 PMCID: PMC6701967 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693138

Abstract

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has devastating consequences on joint function and the morbidity and mortality rate of patients who are victims of this serious complication. Although early diagnosis is one of the consensuses with well-established importance, routine workup is still conducted on an empirical, inconsistent, and nonobjective basis in many centers around the world. The present article seeks to contextualize the current state of knowledge about the early diagnosis of PJIs, as well as to discuss the advances and perspectives, within a scenario of its routine use by the healthcare team responsible for managing this dreaded complication.

Keywords: biomarkers; hip prosthesis; microbiology; signs and symptoms

References

  1. Orthop Clin North Am. 1975 Oct;6(4):991-1003 - PubMed
  2. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Dec;72(6):553-6 - PubMed
  3. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A Suppl 1:S75-80 - PubMed
  4. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 14;351(16):1645-54 - PubMed
  5. Knee. 2006 Aug;13(4):324-7 - PubMed
  6. Int Orthop. 2008 Oct;32(5):597-604 - PubMed
  7. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008 Oct;32(4):287-93 - PubMed
  8. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010 Dec;18(12):760-70 - PubMed
  9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov;469(11):2992-4 - PubMed
  10. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012 Jul;65(2):127-45 - PubMed
  11. Nuklearmedizin. 2012;51(4):133-9 - PubMed
  12. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;56(1):1-10 - PubMed
  13. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013 Aug;21(2):236-40 - PubMed
  14. Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11):1450-2 - PubMed
  15. MBio. 2016 Jan 05;7(1):e01776-15 - PubMed
  16. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016 Jul;47(3):505-15 - PubMed
  17. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):223-227 - PubMed
  18. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Oct 5;98(19):1638-1645 - PubMed
  19. Int Orthop. 2017 Jul;41(7):1315-1319 - PubMed
  20. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9S):S97-S100.e1 - PubMed
  21. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9S):S232-S235 - PubMed
  22. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Aug 25;17(1):592 - PubMed
  23. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Sep 6;99(17):1419-1427 - PubMed
  24. Bone Joint J. 2017 Nov;99-B(11):1482-1489 - PubMed
  25. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jan 17;100(2):147-154 - PubMed
  26. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Apr;78(4):512-23 - PubMed
  27. Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Nov;27(5):1247-54 - PubMed

Publication Types