Display options
Share it on

Biomed Opt Express. 2019 Jun 21;10(7):3484-3496. doi: 10.1364/BOE.10.003484. eCollection 2019 Jul 01.

Segmentation of mouse skin layers in optical coherence tomography image data using deep convolutional neural networks.

Biomedical optics express

Timo Kepp, Christine Droigk, Malte Casper, Michael Evers, Gereon Hüttmann, Nunciada Salma, Dieter Manstein, Mattias P Heinrich, Heinz Handels

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  2. Graduate School for Computing in Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  3. Institute for Signal Processing, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  4. Institute of Biomedical Optics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  5. Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.

PMID: 31467791 PMCID: PMC6706029 DOI: 10.1364/BOE.10.003484

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) enables the non-invasive acquisition of high-resolution three-dimensional cross-sectional images at micrometer scale and is mainly used in the field of ophthalmology for diagnosis as well as monitoring of eye diseases. Also in other areas, such as dermatology, OCT is already well established. Due to its non-invasive nature, OCT is also employed for research studies involving animal models. Manual evaluation of OCT images of animal models is a challenging task due to the lack of imaging standards and the varying anatomy among models. In this paper, we present a deep learning algorithm for the automatic segmentation of several layers of mouse skin in OCT image data using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN). The architecture of our CNN is based on the U-net and is modified by densely connected convolutions. We compared our adapted CNN with our previous algorithm, a combination of a random forest classification and a graph-based refinement, and a baseline U-net. The results showed that, on average, our proposed CNN outperformed our previous algorithm and the baseline U-net. In addition, a reduction of outliers could be observed through the use of densely connected convolutions.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article.

References

  1. Skin Res Technol. 2001 Feb;7(1):1-9 - PubMed
  2. Phys Med Biol. 2002 Feb 21;47(4):641-55 - PubMed
  3. J Biomed Opt. 2003 Jul;8(3):570-5 - PubMed
  4. J Biomed Opt. 2004 Jan-Feb;9(1):207-12 - PubMed
  5. J Dermatol Sci. 2005 Nov;40(2):85-94 - PubMed
  6. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2006 Jan;28(1):119-34 - PubMed
  7. Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28 - PubMed
  8. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 May;14(5):387-91 - PubMed
  9. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 Oct;27(10):1495-505 - PubMed
  10. Lasers Surg Med. 2008 Nov;40(9):595-604 - PubMed
  11. Science. 1991 Nov 22;254(5035):1178-81 - PubMed
  12. Opt Express. 2009 Dec 21;17(26):23719-28 - PubMed
  13. Opt Express. 2010 Aug 30;18(18):19413-28 - PubMed
  14. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011 Feb;30(2):484-96 - PubMed
  15. Med Image Anal. 2013 Dec;17(8):907-28 - PubMed
  16. J Biomed Opt. 2014 Aug;19(8):086022 - PubMed
  17. Biomed Opt Express. 2015 Mar 09;6(4):1172-94 - PubMed
  18. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2016 Feb 27;9784: - PubMed
  19. Biomed Opt Express. 2017 Apr 27;8(5):2732-2744 - PubMed
  20. Biomed Opt Express. 2017 Jun 16;8(7):3292-3316 - PubMed
  21. Biomed Opt Express. 2017 Jul 13;8(8):3627-3642 - PubMed
  22. Biomed Opt Express. 2018 Jun 25;9(7):3244-3265 - PubMed
  23. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 Mar;113(3):325-32 - PubMed

Publication Types