Display options
Cite
Feinberg S, Williams R, Hagler GSW, et al. Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado. Atmos Meas Tech. 2018;11(8):4605-4615doi: 10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018.
Feinberg, S., Williams, R., Hagler, G. S. W., Rickard, J., Brown, R., Garver, D., Harshfield, G., Stauffer, P., Mattson, E., Judge, R., & Garvey, S. (2018). Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado. Atmospheric measurement techniques, 11(8), 4605-4615. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018
Feinberg, Stephen, et al. "Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado." Atmospheric measurement techniques vol. 11,8 (2018): 4605-4615. doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018
Feinberg S, Williams R, Hagler GSW, Rickard J, Brown R, Garver D, Harshfield G, Stauffer P, Mattson E, Judge R, Garvey S. Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado. Atmos Meas Tech. 2018;11(8):4605-4615. doi: 10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018. PMID: 31595175; PMCID: PMC6781239.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Atmos Meas Tech. 2018;11(8):4605-4615. doi: 10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018.

Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado.

Atmospheric measurement techniques

Stephen Feinberg, Ron Williams, Gayle S W Hagler, Joshua Rickard, Ryan Brown, Daniel Garver, Greg Harshfield, Phillip Stauffer, Erick Mattson, Robert Judge, Sam Garvey

Affiliations

  1. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA.
  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
  3. U.S. EPA Region 8, Denver, CO 80202, USA.
  4. U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
  5. State of Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), Denver, CO, USA.
  6. U.S. EPA Region 1, Boston, MA 02109, USA.
  7. Jacobs Technology, Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.

PMID: 31595175 PMCID: PMC6781239 DOI: 10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018

Abstract

Air pollution sensors are quickly proliferating for use in a wide variety of applications, with a low price point that supports use in high-density networks, citizen science, and individual consumer use. This emerging technology motivates the assessment under real-world conditions, including varying pollution levels and environmental conditions. A seven-month, systematic field evaluation of low-cost air pollution sensors was performed in Denver, Colorado, over 2015-2016; the location was chosen to evaluate the sensors in a high-altitude, cool, and dry climate. A suite of particulate matter (PM), ozone (O

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Environ Pollut. 2017 Apr;223:102-110 - PubMed
  2. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2016;50(12):1352-1365 - PubMed
  3. Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Oct 15;47(20):11369-77 - PubMed
  4. Science. 2016 May 20;352(6288):940-3 - PubMed
  5. Atmosphere (Basel). 2017;8(10):182 - PubMed
  6. Environ Int. 2015 Feb;75:199-205 - PubMed
  7. Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 31;607-608:691-705 - PubMed
  8. Environ Pollut. 2015 Apr;199:56-65 - PubMed
  9. Environ Technol. 2018 Jun;39(12):1505-1514 - PubMed
  10. Faraday Discuss. 2016 Jul 18;189:85-103 - PubMed
  11. Sensors (Basel). 2017 Aug 05;17(8): - PubMed
  12. Nature. 2016 Jul 06;535(7610):29-31 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support