Display options
Share it on

Ecol Evol. 2019 Sep 30;9(20):11631-11646. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5641. eCollection 2019 Oct.

Rewiring and indirect effects underpin modularity reshuffling in a marine food web under environmental shifts.

Ecology and evolution

Domenico D'Alelio, Bruno Hay Mele, Simone Libralato, Maurizio Ribera d'Alcalà, Ferenc Jordán

Affiliations

  1. Department of Integrative Marine Ecology Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn Naples Italy.
  2. Oceanography Division Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale - OGS Trieste Italy.
  3. Balaton Limnological Institute and Evolutionary Systems Research Group MTA Centre for Ecological Research Tihany Hungary.

PMID: 31695874 PMCID: PMC6822054 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5641

Abstract

Species are characterized by physiological and behavioral plasticity, which is part of their response to environmental shifts. Nonetheless, the collective response of ecological communities to environmental shifts cannot be predicted from the simple sum of individual species responses, since co-existing species are deeply entangled in interaction networks, such as food webs. For these reasons, the relation between environmental forcing and the structure of food webs is an open problem in ecology. To this respect, one of the main problems in community ecology is defining the role each species plays in shaping community structure, such as by promoting the subdivision of food webs in modules-that is, aggregates composed of species that more frequently interact-which are reported as community stabilizers. In this study, we investigated the relationship between species roles and network modularity under environmental shifts in a highly resolved food web, that is, a "weighted" ecological network reproducing carbon flows among marine planktonic species. Measuring network properties and estimating weighted modularity, we show that species have distinct roles, which differentially affect modularity and mediate structural modifications, such as modules reconfiguration, induced by environmental shifts. Specifically, short-term environmental changes impact the abundance of planktonic primary producers; this affects their consumers' behavior and cascades into the overall rearrangement of trophic links. Food web re-adjustments are both direct, through the rewiring of trophic-interaction networks, and indirect, with the reconfiguration of trophic cascades. Through such "systemic behavior," that is, the way the food web acts as a whole, defined by the interactions among its parts, the planktonic food web undergoes a substantial rewiring while keeping almost the same global flow to upper trophic levels, and energetic hierarchy is maintained despite environmental shifts. This behavior suggests the potentially high resilience of plankton networks, such as food webs, to dramatic environmental changes, such as those provoked by global change.

© 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords: ecological networks; food webs; modularity; plankton; rewiring; roles

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

References

  1. PLoS One. 2019 Jan 15;14(1):e0210659 - PubMed
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 10;109(15):5756-60 - PubMed
  3. Nature. 2004 Mar 18;428(6980):310-3 - PubMed
  4. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Nov;80(5 Pt 2):056117 - PubMed
  5. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Mar 23;1(4):101 - PubMed
  6. Science. 2015 May 22;348(6237):1262073 - PubMed
  7. Nature. 1972 Aug 18;238(5364):413-4 - PubMed
  8. Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Dec;27(12):689-97 - PubMed
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 3;108(18):7641-6 - PubMed
  10. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Dec;1(12):1870-1875 - PubMed
  11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1;108(9):3648-52 - PubMed
  12. Ecol Lett. 2009 Jul;12(7):652-62 - PubMed
  13. Nature. 2003 Nov 20;426(6964):282-5 - PubMed
  14. Nat Commun. 2015 Jun 10;6:7379 - PubMed
  15. Ecol Lett. 2009 Aug;12(8):779-88 - PubMed
  16. Ecol Lett. 2008 Aug;11(8):867-81 - PubMed
  17. Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 17;6:21806 - PubMed
  18. Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Feb;22(2):513-29 - PubMed
  19. Ecol Lett. 2012 Dec;15(12):1353-61 - PubMed
  20. Science. 2010 Aug 13;329(5993):853-6 - PubMed
  21. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2017 Jan 3;9:311-335 - PubMed
  22. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 27;364(1524):1733-41 - PubMed
  23. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 3;13(1):e0190625 - PubMed
  24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 29;105(4):1118-23 - PubMed
  25. Protist. 2016 Aug;167(4):389-410 - PubMed
  26. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jan 15;90(2):592-4 - PubMed
  27. J Anim Ecol. 2009 Jan;78(1):253-69 - PubMed
  28. J Theor Biol. 2003 Feb 7;220(3):303-21 - PubMed
  29. Proc Biol Sci. 2018 May 16;285(1878): - PubMed
  30. Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Nov;30(11):649-661 - PubMed
  31. J Theor Biol. 2002 Feb 7;214(3):405-12 - PubMed
  32. Nature. 2016 Apr 28;532(7600):465-470 - PubMed
  33. Nat Commun. 2016 Jun 23;7:12031 - PubMed
  34. Ecology. 2017 Apr;98(4):995-1005 - PubMed
  35. Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 20;7(1):15868 - PubMed

Publication Types