Display options
Share it on

Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Oct 24;7(10):2325967119876247. doi: 10.1177/2325967119876247. eCollection 2019 Oct.

Closed-Wedge Osteotomy of the Distal Humerus for Treating Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Capitellum in Young Patients.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine

Masato Ueki, Koji Moriya, Takae Yoshizu, Naoto Tsubokawa, Hisao Kouda, Naoto Endo

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Uonuma Kikan Hospital, Minamiuonuma, Japan.
  2. Niigata Hand Surgery Foundation, Niigata, Japan.
  3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital, Nagaoka, Japan.
  4. Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.

PMID: 31696130 PMCID: PMC6820184 DOI: 10.1177/2325967119876247

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Even in patients with an open capitellar physis, nonsurgical treatment for advanced-stage osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the capitellum often yields poor outcomes. However, surgical methods for such patients are controversial. At our institution, we have consistently performed closed-wedge osteotomy of the distal humerus to treat advanced-stage OCD of the capitellum, regardless of the OCD grade or condition of the capitellar physis.

PURPOSE: To clarify the clinical and radiological results and determine the influence of the capitellar physis on closed-wedge osteotomy for advanced-stage OCD of the capitellum in young patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS: A total of 32 patients with OCD of the humeral capitellum were treated surgically with closed-wedge osteotomy. Of these, 17 patients with more than 2-year follow-up were available for an evaluation. The mean patient age was 11.8 years (range, 11-12 years), and the mean follow-up period was 70.1 months (range, 25-184 months). The clinical assessment included range of motion, elbow pain, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and Timmerman-Andrews scores. The radiological assessment at the final examination included cross-bridging of the physis, size and fishtail deformity of the distal part of the humerus, size of the radial head, healing of the OCD lesion, and osteoarthritis.

RESULTS: The mean range of motion and JOA and Timmerman-Andrews scores improved significantly after surgery; 13 patients were completely pain free. In 11 patients with an open capitellar physis, metaphyseal-epiphyseal, cross-bridging was observed in 1 patient. A fishtail deformity of the distal part of the humerus was not observed. Healing of the OCD lesion was defined as excellent in 9 patients, good in 3, fair in 3, and poor in 2. In 3 of the 5 patients in whom healing was described as fair or poor, there was a lesion of the lateral widespread type with osteoarthritis before surgery. Moderate osteoarthritic changes were evident in 2 patients.

CONCLUSION: Closed-wedge osteotomy for the treatment of advanced-stage OCD of the capitellum in young patients can provide satisfactory clinical and radiological results. However, fair and poor outcomes were found in lateral widespread-type cases with osteoarthritis before surgery. We believe that patients in whom osteoarthritic changes have not yet appeared are eligible for closed-wedge osteotomy.

© The Author(s) 2019.

Keywords: capitellum; closed-wedge osteotomy; elbow; osteochondritis dissecans

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has

References

  1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 May;(148):245-53 - PubMed
  2. Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:599-606 - PubMed
  3. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jan;19(1):31-7 - PubMed
  4. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Jun;(363):108-15 - PubMed
  5. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Oct-Nov;33(7):719-24 - PubMed
  6. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2001 Apr;10(2):142-52 - PubMed
  7. Am J Sports Med. 2015 May;43(5):1057-65 - PubMed
  8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Nov;(284):156-60 - PubMed
  9. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Mar;19(2 Suppl):76-82 - PubMed
  10. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):298-304 - PubMed
  11. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jun;89(6):1205-14 - PubMed
  12. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Jun;(435):140-7 - PubMed
  13. Radiology. 2000 Jul;216(1):207-12 - PubMed
  14. Am J Sports Med. 2000 Jul-Aug;28(4):534-7 - PubMed
  15. Am J Sports Med. 1999 Nov-Dec;27(6):728-32 - PubMed
  16. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1959;38:1-232 - PubMed
  17. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3171-3178 - PubMed
  18. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985 Jul;67(6):851-6 - PubMed
  19. Clin Sports Med. 2001 Jul;20(3):565-90 - PubMed
  20. Am J Sports Med. 1994 Mar-Apr;22(2):230-5 - PubMed
  21. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2016 Apr;24(1):51-6 - PubMed
  22. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975 Jul-Aug;(110):35-41 - PubMed
  23. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Mar-Apr;14(2):178-85 - PubMed
  24. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1909-14 - PubMed

Publication Types