Display options
Cite
Bello A, Zaidi D, Braam B, et al. Protocol: Improving Access to Specialist Nephrology Care Among Rural/Remote Dwellers of Alberta: The Role of Electronic Consultation in Improving Care for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2019;6:2054358119878715doi: 10.1177/2054358119878715.
Bello, A., Zaidi, D., Braam, B., Courtney, M., Glassford, J., Jindal, K., Klarenbach, S., Kurzawa, J., Osman, M., Scott-Douglas, N., Szigety, S., Thompson, S., Manns, B., Hemmelgarn, B., & Tonelli, M. (2019). Protocol: Improving Access to Specialist Nephrology Care Among Rural/Remote Dwellers of Alberta: The Role of Electronic Consultation in Improving Care for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease. Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 62054358119878715. https://doi.org/10.1177/2054358119878715
Bello, Aminu, et al. "Protocol: Improving Access to Specialist Nephrology Care Among Rural/Remote Dwellers of Alberta: The Role of Electronic Consultation in Improving Care for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease." Canadian journal of kidney health and disease vol. 6 (2019): 2054358119878715. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2054358119878715
Bello A, Zaidi D, Braam B, Courtney M, Glassford J, Jindal K, Klarenbach S, Kurzawa J, Osman M, Scott-Douglas N, Szigety S, Thompson S, Manns B, Hemmelgarn B, Tonelli M. Protocol: Improving Access to Specialist Nephrology Care Among Rural/Remote Dwellers of Alberta: The Role of Electronic Consultation in Improving Care for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2019 Sep 30;6:2054358119878715. doi: 10.1177/2054358119878715. eCollection 2019. PMID: 31631888; PMCID: PMC6769217.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2019 Sep 30;6:2054358119878715. doi: 10.1177/2054358119878715. eCollection 2019.

Protocol: Improving Access to Specialist Nephrology Care Among Rural/Remote Dwellers of Alberta: The Role of Electronic Consultation in Improving Care for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Canadian journal of kidney health and disease

Aminu Bello, Deenaz Zaidi, Branko Braam, Mark Courtney, Jodi Glassford, Kailash Jindal, Scott Klarenbach, Julia Kurzawa, Mohammed Osman, Nairne Scott-Douglas, Sue Szigety, Stephanie Thompson, Braden Manns, Brenda Hemmelgarn, Marcello Tonelli

Affiliations

  1. Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
  2. Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.
  3. Division of Nephrology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.

PMID: 31631888 PMCID: PMC6769217 DOI: 10.1177/2054358119878715

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) continues to increase, many geographically dispersed Canadians have limited access to specialist nephrology care, which tends to be centralized in major urban areas. As a result, many rural/remote-dwellers in Canada experience poor quality of care and related adverse outcomes. It is imperative to develop alternative care delivery mechanisms to ensure optimal health outcomes for all Canadians.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of electronic consultation (eConsult) as a new model for interactions between specialists and primary care providers (PCPs) to improve access to care for patients with CKD.

DESIGN: This is a sequential, mixed methods study that will be conducted in 3 phases.

SETTING: The study will be conducted across the entire province of Alberta, supported by Alberta Kidney Care (formerly, Northern and Southern Alberta Renal Programs [NARP/SARP]).

PATIENTS: Patients suffering from CKD will be included in the study.

MEASUREMENTS: We will assess the barriers and enablers of implementation and adoption of an e-consultation protocol to facilitate access to care for patients with CKD in Alberta with a focus on rural/remote-dwellers with CKD. We will also evaluate the impact of the eConsult system (eg, improved access to specialist care, reduction in care gaps), assess the feasibility of province-wide implementation, and compare eConsult with practice facilitation versus eConsult alone in terms of access to specialist care, quality of care, and related outcomes.

METHODS: The study will be conducted in 3 phases. In phase 1, we will assess the perceptions of stakeholders (ie, PCPs, nephrologists, patients, policymakers, and other care providers) to improve CKD care delivery, quality, and outcomes in Alberta with focus groups and semistructured interviews. Phase 2 will engage specific family physicians for their input on key factors and logistical issues affecting the feasibility of implementing eConsult for the care of patients with CKD. Phase 3 will provide academic detailing including practice facilitation to clinics in Alberta to assess how eConsult with practice facilitation compares with eConsult alone in terms of access to specialist care, quality of care, and related outcomes.

RESULTS: We will assess stakeholder perceptions about potential barriers to and enablers of a new eConsult and decision support system strategy, focusing on elements that are most important for the design of a feasible and implementable intervention. We will develop, pilot test, and assess the impact of the eConsult model in improving access to specialist nephrology care and the feasibility of province-wide implementation. The final phase of the project will address key challenges for optimal care for patients with CKD living in rural, remote, and underserved areas of Alberta, particularly timely referral and disease management as well as the cost-effective benefits of eConsult.

LIMITATIONS: Lack of high-speed Internet in many rural and remote areas of Alberta may lead to more time spent in completing the eConsult request online versus faxing a referral the traditional way. Allied health care staff (referral coordinators, administrative staff) require training to the eConsult system, and physicians at many remote sites do not have adequate staff to handle eConsult as an added task.

CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of eConsult can favorably influence referral patterns, access to care, care quality, patient outcomes, and health care costs for people with CKD. Results of this study will inform the optimization of care for rural/remote-dwellers with CKD and will facilitate future partnerships with policymakers and provincial renal programs in Alberta to ensure optimal kidney health for all residents.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not required.

© The Author(s) 2019.

Keywords: adverse outcomes; chronic kidney disease (CKD); decision support system (DSS); e-consultation; quality of care; remote; rural

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Int J Med Inform. 2014 Jul;83(7):e1-11 - PubMed
  2. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Jun;6(6):1418-26 - PubMed
  3. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Aug 17;16:109 - PubMed
  4. Health Educ Res. 2012 Apr;27(2):307-18 - PubMed
  5. Eval Health Prof. 2013 Mar;36(1):44-66 - PubMed
  6. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014 Jan;46(1):34-42 - PubMed
  7. BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Oct 13;16:139 - PubMed
  8. Support Care Cancer. 2010 Jan;18(1):121-30 - PubMed
  9. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 May-Jun;28(3):394-403 - PubMed
  10. Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 08;8:88 - PubMed
  11. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Oct;27(10):3849-55 - PubMed
  12. BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Jul 24;8:42 - PubMed
  13. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;23(5):632-9 - PubMed
  14. Health Expect. 2017 Jun;20(3):407-418 - PubMed
  15. Health Promot Int. 2012 Jun;27(2):167-76 - PubMed
  16. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Dec 11;6(12):e250 - PubMed
  17. Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug;50(4):1195-210 - PubMed
  18. BMC Nephrol. 2009 Oct 19;10:30 - PubMed
  19. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Dec;18(6):434-40 - PubMed
  20. BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258 - PubMed
  21. Lancet. 2010 Apr 10;375(9722):1296-309 - PubMed
  22. Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):151-6 - PubMed
  23. Implement Sci. 2011 Oct 21;6:118 - PubMed
  24. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;25(2):232-7 - PubMed
  25. BMC Med Educ. 2007 Oct 12;7:36 - PubMed
  26. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;25(5):676-85 - PubMed
  27. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19(5):e54 - PubMed
  28. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018 Jan 23;5:2054358117753619 - PubMed
  29. Implement Sci. 2015 Mar 28;10:39 - PubMed
  30. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Oct;51(7):1087-110 - PubMed
  31. Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jan-Feb;11(1):80-3 - PubMed
  32. JAMA. 2010 Mar 24;303(12):1151-8 - PubMed
  33. Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun;103(6):e38-46 - PubMed
  34. Transl Behav Med. 2013 Jun 1;3(2):200-210 - PubMed
  35. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2015 Nov;8(8):414-22 - PubMed
  36. J Nurs Educ. 2009 Dec;48(12):661-7 - PubMed
  37. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Feb;21 Suppl 2:S1-8 - PubMed
  38. PLoS One. 2018 Apr 18;13(4):e0195890 - PubMed
  39. Telemed J E Health. 2013 Oct;19(10):733-8 - PubMed
  40. BMJ Open. 2016 May 04;6(5):e011260 - PubMed
  41. Ann Fam Med. 2016 Mar;14(2):133-40 - PubMed
  42. Open Med. 2013 Jan 08;7(1):e1-8 - PubMed
  43. Value Health. 2015 Jan;18(1):5-16 - PubMed
  44. An Bras Dermatol. 2016 May-Jun;91(3):326-30 - PubMed
  45. BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 23;6(6):e010920 - PubMed
  46. Dementia (London). 2015 Jan;14(1):104-13 - PubMed
  47. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Sep 19;7:148 - PubMed
  48. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):13-24 - PubMed
  49. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD000259 - PubMed
  50. CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1423-33 - PubMed
  51. Implement Sci. 2013 Feb 13;8:18 - PubMed
  52. Lancet. 2005 Jan 22-28;365(9456):331-40 - PubMed
  53. Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 19;11(1):141 - PubMed
  54. Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2013 May;3(2):254-258 - PubMed

Publication Types