Display options
Share it on

J Pers Med. 2019 Nov 20;9(4). doi: 10.3390/jpm9040050.

Feasibility of a mHealth Approach to Nutrition Counseling in an Appalachian State.

Journal of personalized medicine

Melissa D Olfert, Makenzie L Barr, Rebecca L Hagedorn, Dustin M Long, Treah S Haggerty, Mathew Weimer, Joseph Golden, Mary Ann Maurer, Jill D Cochran, Tracy Hendershot, Stacey L Whanger, Jay D Mason, Sally L Hodder

Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal and Food Science, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.
  2. School of Public Health, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, 35487, USA.
  3. WVU Family Practice, Department of Family Medicine, Morgantown, WV 26501, USA.
  4. Valley Health System, Department of Family Medicine, Huntington, WV 25701, USA.
  5. New River Health, Department of Family Medicine, Sophia, WV 25921, USA.
  6. CAMC Family Practice, Department of Family Medicine, Charleston, WV 25304, USA.
  7. Robert C. Byrd Clinic and West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lewisburg, WV 24901, USA.
  8. Coplin Memorial Hospital, Family Practice, Elizabeth, WV, 26143, USA.
  9. West Virginia Practice Based Research Network, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
  10. West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.

PMID: 31757057 PMCID: PMC6963633 DOI: 10.3390/jpm9040050

Abstract

West Virginia is a rural state with an aging population that may experience barriers to accessing nutritional and lifestyle counseling. This study examined feasibility of an online personalized nutrition tracking application, Good Measures (GM), with patients at seven health care clinics throughout the state. Fourteen healthcare providers and 64 patients 18 years or older with a Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than or equal to 30 and access to the Internet were recruited for this 12-week feasibility study. Patient participants logged meals and exercise into the GM application via smart phone, tablet, or computer and virtually engaged with a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist (RDN) in one-on-one sessions. The primary endpoint was to examine feasibility of the program by usage of the application and feedback questions regarding the benefits and challenges of the application. Participants were predominately white (92%) and female (76%). Minimal improvements in weight and systolic blood pressure were found. Participant attitude survey data declined from 4-weeks to 12-weeks of the intervention. Interestingly though, patients in a rural clinic had lesser declines in attitudes than peri-urban participants. Qualitative feedback data identified participants predominately had a positive overall feeling toward the approach. Participants expressed favorability of RDN access, the variety of foods, but did give suggestions for in-person meetings and more updating of the application. Implementing a technology approach to nutrition in rural areas of West Virginia using a mobile application with RDN access may be one strategy to address public health issues such as obesity.

Keywords: Appalachia; app; dietitian; feasibility; mHealth; rural

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014 Aug;27(4):322-32 - PubMed
  2. Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528 - PubMed
  3. NCHS Data Brief. 2012 Oct;(107):1-8 - PubMed
  4. Nutr Rev. 2016 Oct;74(10):645-58 - PubMed
  5. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Mar;78:11-19 - PubMed
  6. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 29;372(5):447-55 - PubMed
  7. Metabolism. 2012 Aug;61(8):1058-66 - PubMed
  8. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Aug;23(3):935-41 - PubMed
  9. Health Psychol. 2016 Nov;35(11):1178-1188 - PubMed
  10. Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Apr;101(4):750-757 - PubMed
  11. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011 Jun;35(3):293-4 - PubMed
  12. Prim Care. 2016 Mar;43(1):83-95, viii-ix - PubMed
  13. Prev Med. 1995 Nov;24(6):546-52 - PubMed
  14. Am J Med. 2014 Mar;127(3):183-7 - PubMed
  15. Prev Med Rep. 2018 Nov 30;13:126-131 - PubMed
  16. BMC Obes. 2014 Jul 27;1:10 - PubMed
  17. Am J Prev Med. 2017 Dec;53(6S2):S164-S171 - PubMed
  18. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Oct 10;13(1):109 - PubMed
  19. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Jul 11;2(3):e18 - PubMed
  20. JAMA. 2014 Dec 17;312(23):2531-41 - PubMed
  21. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Apr 19;14(4): - PubMed
  22. Child Youth Serv. 2019;40(2):158-183 - PubMed
  23. Diabetes. 2011 Nov;60(11):2667-8 - PubMed
  24. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jan 20;4(1):e5 - PubMed
  25. Int J Audiol. 2018 Feb;57(2):124-134 - PubMed
  26. Phys Ther. 2015 Mar;95(3):397-405 - PubMed
  27. Public Health Nutr. 2011 Aug;14(8):1429-38 - PubMed
  28. J Rural Health. 2012 Fall;28(4):392-7 - PubMed
  29. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Mar;117(3):404-421.e36 - PubMed
  30. J Adolesc Health. 2018 Mar;62(3S):S65-S71 - PubMed
  31. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 21;378(25):e34 - PubMed
  32. J Technol Behav Sci. 2019 Mar;4(1):33-41 - PubMed
  33. J Rural Health. 2006 Spring;22(2):140-6 - PubMed
  34. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2010 Jan;8(1):59-63 - PubMed
  35. Telemed J E Health. 2014 Feb;20(2):182-5 - PubMed
  36. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2001 Feb;14(1):25-32 - PubMed
  37. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):212-20 - PubMed
  38. J Obes. 2019 Mar 3;2019:7932750 - PubMed
  39. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jun 18;6(6):e128 - PubMed
  40. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2017 Aug;30(4):439-452 - PubMed
  41. J Pediatr Psychol. 2019 Apr 1;44(3):375-387 - PubMed
  42. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Jan 13;66(2):1-7 - PubMed
  43. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 30;19(1):126 - PubMed
  44. Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105:156-168 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support