Display options
Share it on

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Jan;102(1):20-27. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0458.

Does Chest Attachment of an Automated Respiratory Rate Monitor Influence the Actual Respiratory Rate in Children Under Five?.

The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene

Daniel Helldén, Kevin Baker, Tedila Habte, Esey Batisso, Nicola Orsini, Karin Källander, Tobias Alfvén

Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  2. Malaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.
  3. Malaria Consortium, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  4. UNICEF Health Section, New York, New York.
  5. Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

PMID: 31769406 PMCID: PMC6947785 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0458

Abstract

Pneumonia is one of the leading causes of death in children under 5 years worldwide. In resource-limited settings, WHO recommendations state that pneumonia can be presumptively diagnosed through the presence of cough and/or difficult breathing and a respiratory rate (RR) that is higher than age-specific cutoffs. As a new diagnostic aid the children's automated respiration monitor (ChARM) can automatically measure and classify RR in children under 5 years, but the effect of its chest attachment on the RR has not been studied. The aim of this study was to understand if misclassification of the true RR occurred by ChARM attachment. Two hundred eighty-seven children at a health center in South Ethiopia were screened for eligibility, with 188 children aged 2-59 months enrolled in the study. The RR was measured manually before and 1, 3, and 5 minutes after ChARM attachment. The proportion of children with fast or normal RR classification at baseline and the change between RR classifications over time were analyzed. Eight (4.9%; 95% CI 2.1, 9.4) of 163 children changed RR classification from normal to fast between the baseline RR count and the 1 minute RR count. Results from this study suggest that ChARM has a minor influence on the RR of children immediately after attachment, in most cases without clinical importance.

References

  1. Bull World Health Organ. 1993;71(5):523-7 - PubMed
  2. J Trop Pediatr. 2014 Apr;60(2):93-8 - PubMed
  3. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2003 Jun;23(2):135-8 - PubMed
  4. Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Feb;22(2):139-147 - PubMed
  5. Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Dec;2(12):950-2 - PubMed
  6. Trop Med Int Health. 2011 Oct;16(10):1234-42 - PubMed
  7. Bull World Health Organ. 2008 May;86(5):408-16 - PubMed
  8. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006 Oct;100(10):956-63 - PubMed
  9. Pediatrics. 1994 Sep;94(3):350-5 - PubMed
  10. Lancet. 2013 Apr 20;381(9875):1405-1416 - PubMed
  11. Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Jun;20(6):757-65 - PubMed
  12. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Nov;87(5 Suppl):127-136 - PubMed
  13. Malar J. 2012 Aug 20;11:282 - PubMed
  14. Lancet. 2011 Mar 19;377(9770):1011-8 - PubMed
  15. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2003 Jul;41(4):377-83 - PubMed
  16. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 11;9(6):e99266 - PubMed
  17. Lancet. 2015 Jan 31;385(9966):430-40 - PubMed
  18. EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Jun 10;12:20-30 - PubMed
  19. Arch Dis Child. 1991 Oct;66(10):1199-203 - PubMed
  20. Arch Dis Child. 2015 Feb;100 Suppl 1:S23-8 - PubMed
  21. Arch Dis Child. 1991 Jan;66(1):81-4 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types