Display options
Share it on

Ann Coloproctol. 2019 Oct;35(5):242-248. doi: 10.3393/ac.2018.09.06. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial.

Annals of coloproctology

Hamid Nasrolahi, Sepideh Mirzaei, Mohammad Mohammadianpanah, Ali Mohammad Bananzadeh, Maral Mokhtari, Mohammad Reza Sasani, Ahmad Mosalaei, Shapour Omidvari, Mansour Ansari, Niloofar Ahmadloo, Seyed Hasan Hamedi, Nezhat Khanjani

Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Iran.
  2. Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  3. Colorectal Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  4. Colorectal Research Center, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Shahid Faghihi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  5. Colorectal Research Center, Department of Pathology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  6. Medical Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  7. Shiraz Institute for Cancer Research, Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  8. Breast Diseases Research Center, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

PMID: 31725999 PMCID: PMC6863011 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2018.09.06

Abstract

PURPOSE: Currently, neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by total mesorectal resection is considered the standard of care for treating locally advanced rectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of adding induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant CRT in locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS: This phase-II clinical trial included 54 patients with newly diagnosed, locally advanced (clinical T3-4 and/or N1-2, M0) rectal cancer. All patients were treated with 3 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy using the XELOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) regimen before and after a concurrent standard long course of CRT (45-50.4 Gy) followed by standard radical surgery. Pathologic complete response (PCR) rate and toxicity were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.

RESULTS: The study participants included 37 males and 17 females, with a median age of 59 years (range, 20-80 years). Twenty-nine patients (54%) had clinical stage-II disease, and 25 patients (46%) had clinical stage-III disease. Larger tumor size (P = 0.006) and distal rectal location (P = 0.009) showed lower PCR compared to smaller tumor size and upper rectal location. Pathologic examinations showed significant tumor regression (6.1 ± 2.7 cm vs. 1.9 ± 1.8 cm, P < 0.001) with 10 PCRs (18.5%) compared to before the intervention. The surgical margin was free of cancer in 52 patients (96.3%). Treatment-related toxicities were easily tolerated, and all patients completed their planned treatment without interruption. Grade III and IV toxicities were infrequent.

CONCLUSION: The addition of induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant CRT is an effective and well-tolerated treatment approach in patients with rectal cancer.

Keywords: Induction chemotherapy; Neoadjuvant treatment; Pathologic complete response; Rectal neoplasms

References

  1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Sep 1;72(1):99-107 - PubMed
  2. Ann Oncol. 2012 Jun;23(6):1525-30 - PubMed
  3. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov;24(12):3587-3595 - PubMed
  4. Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct;23(10):2517-26 - PubMed
  5. Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov;19(11):973-979 - PubMed
  6. Surg Today. 2017 Nov;47(11):1372-1377 - PubMed
  7. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov;143(11):2363-2373 - PubMed
  8. Am J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun;40(3):283-287 - PubMed
  9. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 20;34(27):3300-7 - PubMed
  10. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 1;24(4):668-74 - PubMed
  11. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 10;28(5):859-65 - PubMed
  12. Anticancer Res. 2017 May;37(5):2683-2691 - PubMed
  13. Dig Surg. 2015;32(4):275-83 - PubMed
  14. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 Apr;12(4):513-9 - PubMed
  15. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Sep;11(9):835-44 - PubMed
  16. Crit Rev Oncog. 2012;17(4):331-43 - PubMed
  17. Cancer. 2017 Mar 1;123(5):783-793 - PubMed
  18. Oncologist. 2011;16(5):614-20 - PubMed
  19. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;(2):CD006041 - PubMed
  20. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Mar;79(3):519-525 - PubMed
  21. Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct;23(10):2627-33 - PubMed
  22. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2015 Sep;46(3):219-36 - PubMed
  23. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017 Jun;16(2):e7-e14 - PubMed
  24. Oncotarget. 2017 May 23;8(21):34340-34351 - PubMed
  25. Br J Cancer. 2008 Apr 8;98(7):1204-9 - PubMed
  26. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;82(4):707-716 - PubMed
  27. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 10;29(20):2773-80 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support