Display options
Share it on

World Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;19(1):81-91. doi: 10.1002/wps.20700.

The interplay among psychopathology, personal resources, context-related factors and real-life functioning in schizophrenia: stability in relationships after 4 years and differences in network structure between recovered and non-recovered patients.

World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)

Silvana Galderisi, Paola Rucci, Armida Mucci, Alessandro Rossi, Paola Rocca, Alessandro Bertolino, Eugenio Aguglia, Mario Amore, Antonello Bellomo, Paola Bozzatello, Paola Bucci, Bernardo Carpiniello, Enrico Collantoni, Alessandro Cuomo, Liliana Dell'Osso, Fabio Di Fabio, Massimo di Giannantonio, Dino Gibertoni, Giulia Maria Giordano, Carlo Marchesi, Palmiero Monteleone, Lucio Oldani, Maurizio Pompili, Rita Roncone, Rodolfo Rossi, Alberto Siracusano, Antonio Vita, Patrizia Zeppegno, Mario Maj,

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
  2. Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  3. Section of Psychiatry, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
  4. Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  5. Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
  6. Department of Clinical and Molecular Biomedicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
  7. Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
  8. Psychiatry Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
  9. Section of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health, Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
  10. Psychiatric Clinic, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  11. Department of Molecular Medicine and Clinical Department of Mental Health, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
  12. Section of Psychiatry, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
  13. Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  14. Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy.
  15. Psychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
  16. Section of Neuroscience, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
  17. Department of Psychiatry, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  18. Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, S. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  19. Unit of Psychiatry, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
  20. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  21. Psychiatric Unit, School of Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
  22. Department of Mental Health, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
  23. Psychiatric Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.

PMID: 31922687 PMCID: PMC6953544 DOI: 10.1002/wps.20700

Abstract

Improving real-life functioning is the main goal of the most advanced integrated treatment programs in people with schizophrenia. The Italian Network for Research on Psychoses previously explored, by using network analysis, the interplay among illness-related variables, personal resources, context-related factors and real-life functioning in a large sample of patients with schizophrenia. The same research network has now completed a 4-year follow-up of the original sample. In the present study, we used network analysis to test whether the pattern of relationships among all variables investigated at baseline was similar at follow-up. In addition, we compared the network structure of patients who were classified as recovered at follow-up versus those who did not recover. Six hundred eighteen subjects recruited at baseline could be assessed in the follow-up study. The network structure did not change significantly from baseline to follow-up, and the overall strength of the connections among variables increased slightly, but not significantly. Functional capacity and everyday life skills had a high betweenness and closeness in the network at follow-up, as they had at baseline, while psychopathological variables remained more peripheral. The network structure and connectivity of non-recovered patients were similar to those observed in the whole sample, but very different from those in recovered subjects, in which we found few connections only. These data strongly suggest that tightly coupled symptoms/dysfunctions tend to maintain each other's activation, contributing to poor outcome in schizophrenia. Early and integrated treatment plans, targeting variables with high centrality, might prevent the emergence of self-reinforcing networks of symptoms and dysfunctions in people with schizophrenia.

© 2020 World Psychiatric Association.

Keywords: Schizophrenia; everyday life skills; functional capacity; internalized stigma; network analysis; personal resources; psychopathology; real-life functioning; recovery

References

  1. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;165(2):214-20 - PubMed
  2. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2010;4:3-21 - PubMed
  3. Schizophr Bull. 2014 Apr;40 Suppl 3:S165-94 - PubMed
  4. World Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;11(2):73-9 - PubMed
  5. Schizophr Res. 2018 Mar;193:232-239 - PubMed
  6. Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):195-212 - PubMed
  7. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;165(2):203-13 - PubMed
  8. Schizophr Res. 2014 Oct;159(1):144-50 - PubMed
  9. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2010;12(3):393-407 - PubMed
  10. J Ment Health. 2002;11(2):191-8 - PubMed
  11. World Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;13(3):275-87 - PubMed
  12. World Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;18(3):272-273 - PubMed
  13. Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Dec 30;28(24):1529-42 - PubMed
  14. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2003;12(2):65-76 - PubMed
  15. Psychiatry Res. 2003 Nov 1;121(1):31-49 - PubMed
  16. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 1;75(4):396-404 - PubMed
  17. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;72(12):1219-26 - PubMed
  18. World Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;17(2):143-144 - PubMed
  19. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1993 Apr;87(4):244-52 - PubMed
  20. Schizophr Res. 2012 May;137(1-3):246-50 - PubMed
  21. Schizophr Bull. 2007 Nov;33(6):1364-72 - PubMed
  22. J Abnorm Psychol. 1993 May;102(2):312-8 - PubMed
  23. Psychol Med. 2019 Mar 28;:1-8 - PubMed
  24. World Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;16(1):5-13 - PubMed
  25. Schizophr Res. 2011 Feb;125(2-3):152-60 - PubMed
  26. Schizophr Bull. 2011 Mar;37(2):300-5 - PubMed
  27. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261-76 - PubMed
  28. Schizophr Res. 2009 Feb;107(2-3):232-7 - PubMed
  29. Eur Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;22(8):490-8 - PubMed
  30. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;162(3):441-9 - PubMed
  31. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1993 Dec;(22):39-44 - PubMed
  32. Psychiatry Res. 2008 Nov 30;161(2):213-24 - PubMed
  33. World Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;18(2):146-161 - PubMed

Publication Types