Display options
Cite
Treviño M, Turkbey B, Wood BJ, et al. Rapid perceptual processing in two- and three-dimensional prostate images. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020;7(2):022406doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.022406.
Treviño, M., Turkbey, B., Wood, B. J., Pinto, P. A., Czarniecki, M., Choyke, P. L., & Horowitz, T. S. (2020). Rapid perceptual processing in two- and three-dimensional prostate images. Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 7(2), 022406. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.022406
Treviño, Melissa, et al. "Rapid perceptual processing in two- and three-dimensional prostate images." Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) vol. 7,2 (2020): 022406. doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.022406
Treviño M, Turkbey B, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Czarniecki M, Choyke PL, Horowitz TS. Rapid perceptual processing in two- and three-dimensional prostate images. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020 Mar;7(2):022406. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.022406. Epub 2020 Jan 03. PMID: 31930156; PMCID: PMC6941639.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020 Mar;7(2):022406. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.022406. Epub 2020 Jan 03.

Rapid perceptual processing in two- and three-dimensional prostate images.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)

Melissa Treviño, Baris Turkbey, Bradford J Wood, Peter A Pinto, Marcin Czarniecki, Peter L Choyke, Todd S Horowitz

Affiliations

  1. National Cancer Institute, Basic Biobehavioral and Psychological Sciences Branch, Rockville, Maryland, United States.
  2. National Cancer Institute, Molecular Imaging Program, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
  3. National Cancer Institute, Center for Interventional Oncology, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
  4. National Cancer Institute, Urologic Oncology Branch, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
  5. Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States.

PMID: 31930156 PMCID: PMC6941639 DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.022406

Abstract

Radiologists can identify whether a radiograph is abnormal or normal at above chance levels in breast and lung images presented for half a second or less. This early perceptual processing has only been demonstrated in static two-dimensional images (e.g., mammograms). Can radiologists rapidly extract the "gestalt" from more complex imaging modalities? For example, prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) displays a series of images as a virtual stack and comprises multiple imaging sequences: anatomical information from the T2-weighted (T2W) sequence, functional information from diffusion-weighted imaging, and apparent diffusion coefficient sequences. We first tested rapid perceptual processing in static T2W images then among the two functional sequences. Finally, we examined whether this rapid radiological perception could be observed using T2W multislice imaging. Readers with experience in prostate mpMRI could detect and localize lesions in all sequences after viewing a 500-ms static image. Experienced prostate readers could also detect and localize lesions when viewing multislice image stacks presented as brief movies, with image slices presented at either 48, 96, or 144 ms. The ability to quickly extract the perceptual gestalt may be a general property of expert perception, even in complex imaging modalities.

© 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Keywords: gestalt; multiparametric MRI; prostate; rapid perceptual processing; three-dimensional; two-dimensional

References

  1. Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203 - PubMed
  2. Acad Radiol. 2012 Dec;19(12):1508-17 - PubMed
  3. Nature. 1975 Feb 6;253(5491):437-8 - PubMed
  4. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Dec;20(6):1170-5 - PubMed
  5. Cogn Psychol. 1997 Oct;34(1):72-107 - PubMed
  6. Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):453-61 - PubMed
  7. Eur J Radiol. 2007 Feb;61(2):297-302 - PubMed
  8. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Aug;33(4):753-63 - PubMed
  9. Prostate. 2000 Apr 1;43(1):43-8 - PubMed
  10. Perception. 1980;9(3):339-44 - PubMed
  11. Am J Surg Pathol. 1988 Aug;12(8):619-33 - PubMed
  12. Breast. 2013 Apr;22(2):101-108 - PubMed
  13. Eur Radiol. 2003 May;13(5):925-30 - PubMed
  14. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Apr;42(4):1255-1258 - PubMed
  15. Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Apr;7(2):243-255 - PubMed
  16. World J Radiol. 2010 May 28;2(5):180-7 - PubMed
  17. Oncotarget. 2018 Sep 18;9(73):33804-33817 - PubMed
  18. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018;3(1):10 - PubMed
  19. Acad Radiol. 2019 Jan;26(1):5-14 - PubMed
  20. Radiology. 1975 Sep;116(3):527-32 - PubMed
  21. Eur Urol. 2011 Aug;60(2):291-303 - PubMed
  22. Behav Res Methods. 2015 Mar;47(1):1-12 - PubMed
  23. Prog Brain Res. 2006;155:23-36 - PubMed
  24. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Jul;46(1):11-23 - PubMed
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 13;113(37):10292-7 - PubMed
  26. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 11;8(10):e76175 - PubMed
  27. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Apr;162(4):865-72 - PubMed
  28. Urology. 2015 Feb;85(2):423-8 - PubMed
  29. Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40 - PubMed
  30. Psychol Sci. 2012;23(11):1395-403 - PubMed
  31. BJU Int. 2009 Apr;103(7):883-8 - PubMed

Publication Types