Display options
Cite
Dos Santos DM, Bitencourt SB, da Silva EV, et al. Bond strength of lithium disilicate after cleaning methods of the remaining hydrofluoric acid. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(2):e103-e107doi: 10.4317/jced.56412.
Dos Santos, D. M., Bitencourt, S. B., da Silva, E. V., Matos, A. O., Benez, G. C., Rangel, E. C., Pesqueira, A. A., Barão, V. A., & Goiato, M. C. (2020). Bond strength of lithium disilicate after cleaning methods of the remaining hydrofluoric acid. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 12(2), e103-e107. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.56412
Dos Santos, Daniela-Micheline, et al. "Bond strength of lithium disilicate after cleaning methods of the remaining hydrofluoric acid." Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry vol. 12,2 (2020): e103-e107. doi: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.56412
Dos Santos DM, Bitencourt SB, da Silva EV, Matos AO, Benez GC, Rangel EC, Pesqueira AA, Barão VA, Goiato MC. Bond strength of lithium disilicate after cleaning methods of the remaining hydrofluoric acid. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Feb 01;12(2):e103-e107. doi: 10.4317/jced.56412. eCollection 2020 Feb. PMID: 32071690; PMCID: PMC7018474.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Feb 01;12(2):e103-e107. doi: 10.4317/jced.56412. eCollection 2020 Feb.

Bond strength of lithium disilicate after cleaning methods of the remaining hydrofluoric acid.

Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry

Daniela-Micheline Dos Santos, Sandro-Basso Bitencourt, Emily-Vivianne-Freitas da Silva, Adaias-Oliveira Matos, Georgia-de Castro Benez, Elidiane-Cipriano Rangel, Aldiéris-Alves Pesqueira, Valentim-Adelino-Ricardo Barão, Marcelo-Coelho Goiato

Affiliations

  1. DDS, PhD, Professor, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  2. DDS, MSc, PhD student, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  3. DDS, MSc, PhD Student, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  4. DDS, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  5. PhD, Professor, Laboratory of Technological Plasmas, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Sorocaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  6. DDS, PhD, Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

PMID: 32071690 PMCID: PMC7018474 DOI: 10.4317/jced.56412

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Different ceramic surface cleaning methods have been suggested after the acid conditioning. The aim was to evaluate the effect of different protocols used to remove the remaining hydrofluoric acid on the shear bond strength (SBS) between lithium disilicate and resin cement.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-four specimens of lithium disilicate (IPS e.max Press) were divided in 4 groups (n=11): group C (control, no treatment); group HF+S (5% hydrofluoric acid + silane); group HF+US+S (5% hydrofluoric acid + ultrasound cleaning + silane); group HF+PH+S (5% hydrofluoric acid + 37% phosphoric acid + silane). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) were performed to characterize the surface morphology. The SBS test was performed on the resin/ceramic interface, and the failure mode was characterized. SBS values were submitted to 1-way ANOVA and the Tukey test (α=.05). The relation between surface treatment and failure modes was analyzed using the chi-squared test (α=.05).

RESULTS: The surface treatment type interfered in the shear strength (

CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of ultrasound cleaning was an effective procedure to remove remaining fluorsilicate salts, promoting the highest SBS values.

Copyright: © 2020 Medicina Oral S.L.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exist.

References

  1. Lasers Med Sci. 2017 May;32(4):779-785 - PubMed
  2. Dent Mater. 2004 Mar;20(3):286-92 - PubMed
  3. J Dent Res. 1995 Sep;74(9):1591-6 - PubMed
  4. J Adhes Dent. 2012 Dec;14(6):507-9 - PubMed
  5. Dent Clin North Am. 1983 Oct;27(4):671-84 - PubMed
  6. Dent Mater. 2006 Feb;22(2):99-106 - PubMed
  7. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Apr;77(4):405-13 - PubMed
  8. Dent Mater. 2012 Feb;28(2):189-96 - PubMed
  9. Oper Dent. 1998 Sep-Oct;23(5):250-7 - PubMed
  10. J Oral Rehabil. 2001 Jan;28(1):95-101 - PubMed
  11. Oper Dent. 2009 Mar-Apr;34(2):211-6 - PubMed
  12. J Prosthodont. 2008 Jul;17(5):415-9 - PubMed
  13. Oper Dent. 2015 Sep-Oct;40(5):470-9 - PubMed
  14. Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Feb;16(1):15-23 - PubMed
  15. J Adhes Dent. 2010 Aug;12(4):295-303 - PubMed
  16. Dent Mater. 1999 Mar;15(2):105-19 - PubMed
  17. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Jun;115(6):780-7 - PubMed
  18. Dent Mater. 2004 May;20(4):338-44 - PubMed
  19. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018 Nov 1;92:196-205 - PubMed
  20. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1999 Oct;30(2 Pt 1):110-6 - PubMed
  21. J Emerg Med. 1992 Mar-Apr;10(2):163-8 - PubMed

Publication Types