Display options
Share it on

J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2020 Jan 31;6(1):32-40. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2020-0003. eCollection 2020 Jan.

Therapeutic Evaluation of Computed Tomography Findings for Efficacy of Prone Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients with Abdominal Surgery.

Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures)

Masayuki Akatsuka, Hiroomi Tatsumi, Naoya Yama, Yoshiki Masuda

Affiliations

  1. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
  2. Department of Anaesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
  3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.

PMID: 32104729 PMCID: PMC7029406 DOI: 10.2478/jccm-2020-0003

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), the heterogeneity of lung lesions results in a mis-match between ventilation and perfusion, leading to the development of hypoxia. The study aimed to examine the association between computed tomographic (CT scan) lung findings in patients with ARDS after abdominal surgery and improved hypoxia and mortality after prone ventilation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single site, retrospective observational study was performed at the Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, between 1st January 2004 and 31st October 2018. Patients were allocated to one of two groups after CT scanning according to the presence of ground-glass opacity (GGO) or alveolar shadow with predominantly dorsal lung atelectasis (DLA) on lung CT scan images. Also, Patients were divided into a prone ventilation group and a supine ventilation group when the treatment for ARDS was started.

RESULTS: We analyzed data for fifty-one patients with ARDS following abdominal surgery. CT scans confirmed GGO in five patients in the Group A and in nine patients in the Group B, and DLA in 17 patients in the Group A and nine patients in the Group B. Both GGO and DLA were present in two patients in the Group A and nine patients in the Group B. Prone ventilation significantly improved patients' impaired ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen from 12 h after prone positioning compared with that in the supine position. Weaning from mechanical ventilation occurred significantly earlier in the Group A with DLA vs the Group B with DLA (P < 0.001). Twenty-eight-day mortality was significantly lower for the Group A with DLA vs the Group B with DLA (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that prone ventilation could be effective for treating patients with ARDS as showing the DLA.

© 2020 Masayuki Akatsuka, Hiroomi Tatsumi, Naoya Yama, Yoshiki Masuda, published by Sciendo.

Keywords: acute respiratory distress syndrome; computed tomography; prone position

References

  1. Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec;31(12):2719-26 - PubMed
  2. Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):603-9 - PubMed
  3. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Jul;26(7):857-69 - PubMed
  4. J Artif Organs. 2014 Mar;17(1):106-9 - PubMed
  5. Intensive Care Med. 1986;12(3):137-42 - PubMed
  6. Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;28(7):2406-14 - PubMed
  7. Chest. 1988 Jul;94(1):103-7 - PubMed
  8. Ann Surg. 1997 Jun;225(6):744-53; discussion 753-6 - PubMed
  9. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 23;345(8):568-73 - PubMed
  10. Anesthesiology. 1974 Sep;41(3):242-55 - PubMed
  11. Anesthesiology. 1991 Jan;74(1):15-23 - PubMed
  12. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8 - PubMed
  13. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68 - PubMed
  14. Chest. 1994 Nov;106(5):1511-6 - PubMed
  15. Crit Care Med. 1976 Jan-Feb;4(1):13-4 - PubMed
  16. JAMA. 2004 Nov 17;292(19):2379-87 - PubMed
  17. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1334-49 - PubMed
  18. Arch Surg. 1991 Feb;126(2):170-5 - PubMed
  19. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Apr;36(4):585-99 - PubMed
  20. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1977 Apr;115(4):559-66 - PubMed
  21. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Mar;149(3 Pt 1):818-24 - PubMed
  22. JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33 - PubMed
  23. Anesthesiology. 1989 Jun;70(6):891-8 - PubMed

Publication Types