Cite
Al Alam D, Danopoulos S, Grubbs B, et al. Reply to de Steenhuijsen Piters and Bogaert: Bacterial DNA in Fetal Lung Samples May Be Explained by Sample Contamination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201(10):1311-1312doi: 10.1164/rccm.202001-0221LE.
Al Alam, D., Danopoulos, S., Grubbs, B., Ali, N. A. B. M., Mac Aogáin, M., Chotirmall, S. H., Warburton, D., Gaggar, A., Ambalavanan, N., & Lal, C. V. (2020). Reply to de Steenhuijsen Piters and Bogaert: Bacterial DNA in Fetal Lung Samples May Be Explained by Sample Contamination. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 201(10), 1311-1312. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202001-0221LE
Al Alam, Denise, et al. "Reply to de Steenhuijsen Piters and Bogaert: Bacterial DNA in Fetal Lung Samples May Be Explained by Sample Contamination." American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine vol. 201,10 (2020): 1311-1312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202001-0221LE
Al Alam D, Danopoulos S, Grubbs B, Ali NABM, Mac Aogáin M, Chotirmall SH, Warburton D, Gaggar A, Ambalavanan N, Lal CV. Reply to de Steenhuijsen Piters and Bogaert: Bacterial DNA in Fetal Lung Samples May Be Explained by Sample Contamination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 15;201(10):1311-1312. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202001-0221LE. PMID: 32049546; PMCID: PMC7233351.
Copy
Download .nbib