Display options
Share it on

J Occup Med Toxicol. 2020 Feb 12;15:1. doi: 10.1186/s12995-020-0253-x. eCollection 2020.

Are social conflicts at work associated with depressive symptomatology? Results from the population-based LIFE-Adult-Study.

Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)

Andrea E Zuelke, Susanne Roehr, Matthias L Schroeter, A Veronica Witte, Andreas Hinz, Christoph Engel, Cornelia Enzenbach, Joachim Thiery, Markus Loeffler, Arno Villringer, Steffi G Riedel-Heller

Affiliations

  1. 1Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
  2. 2Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
  3. 3University Hospital Leipzig, Day Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, Leipzig, Germany.
  4. 4Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  5. 5Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  6. 6Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics (ILM), University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

PMID: 32082403 PMCID: PMC7017627 DOI: 10.1186/s12995-020-0253-x

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial stressors in the workplace can be detrimental to mental health. Conflicts at work, e.g. aggression, hostility or threats from coworkers, supervisors or customers, can be considered a psychosocial stressor, possibly increasing risk for depressive symptoms. Existing studies, however, differ in the assessment of social conflicts, i.e. as individual- or job-level characteristics. Here, we investigated the association between conflicts at work assessed as objective job characteristics, and depressive symptomatology, using data from a large population-based sample. Additionally, we investigated gender differences and the impact of personality traits and social resources.

METHODS: We used data from the population-based LIFE-Adult-Study from Leipzig, Germany. Information on conflicts at work, assessed as job characteristics, were drawn from the Occupational Information Network, depressive symptoms were assessed via the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. Multilevel linear regression models with individuals and occupations as levels of analysis were applied to investigate the association between conflicts at work and depressive symptoms.

RESULTS: Our sample included 2164 employed adults (age: 18-65 years, mean: 49.3, SD: 7.9) in 65 occupations. No association between conflicts s at work and depressive symptomatology was found (men: b = - 0.14;

CONCLUSION: Conflicts at work, assessed as objective job characteristics, were not associated with depressive symptoms. Possible links between interpersonal conflict and impaired mental health might rather be explained by subjective perceptions of social stressors and individual coping styles.

© The Author(s). 2020.

Keywords: CES-D; Depressive symptoms; Mental health; Multilevel model; O*NET; Psychosocial work environment; Social conflict

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. J Occup Environ Med. 2011 Feb;53(2):185-9 - PubMed
  2. Compr Psychiatry. 2004 Jul-Aug;45(4):246-53 - PubMed
  3. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;161(4):631-6 - PubMed
  4. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Oct;3(4):390-401 - PubMed
  5. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Feb;49(1):48-53 - PubMed
  6. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(6):1334-45 - PubMed
  7. Occup Environ Med. 2008 Jul;65(7):438-45 - PubMed
  8. Am J Public Health. 1988 Oct;78(10):1336-42 - PubMed
  9. J Occup Health Psychol. 2009 Jan;14(1):46-57 - PubMed
  10. Aging Ment Health. 2019 May 25;:1-7 - PubMed
  11. Psychol Med. 2017 Jun;47(8):1342-1356 - PubMed
  12. Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Jan 15;157(2):98-112 - PubMed
  13. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Feb;66(3):650-62 - PubMed
  14. J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Dec;50(12):1401-13 - PubMed
  15. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2014 May 28;9:23 - PubMed
  16. Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;209(4):284-293 - PubMed
  17. J Adv Nurs. 2003 Apr;42(1):90-6 - PubMed
  18. Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jul;61(1):1-14 - PubMed
  19. J Psychol Afr. 2014 May;24(3):281-284 - PubMed
  20. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Apr;5(2):269-77 - PubMed
  21. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 30;9(7):e103501 - PubMed
  22. Psychiatr Prax. 2016 Jul;43(5):245-52 - PubMed
  23. Eur J Epidemiol. 2000 Apr;16(4):371-6 - PubMed
  24. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1989 Aug;15(4):271-9 - PubMed
  25. Soc Sci Med. 2004 May;58(10):1889-901 - PubMed
  26. BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 22;15:691 - PubMed
  27. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Oct;3(4):356-367 - PubMed
  28. Law Hum Behav. 1998 Feb;22(1):33-57 - PubMed
  29. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Oct;5(4):428-40 - PubMed
  30. J Psychosom Res. 1996 Feb;40(2):157-67 - PubMed
  31. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2013 Jun 22;8(1):18 - PubMed
  32. Ind Health. 2010;48(3):251-5 - PubMed
  33. Epidemiol Rev. 2008;30:118-32 - PubMed
  34. J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Apr;46(4):398-412 - PubMed
  35. Depress Anxiety. 2006;23(5):281-9 - PubMed
  36. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Apr;56(4):244-5 - PubMed
  37. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005 Aug;78(7):517-22 - PubMed
  38. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006 Mar;113(3):180-206 - PubMed
  39. Psychiatr Prax. 2019 Sep;46(6):310-316 - PubMed
  40. J Health Soc Behav. 1980 Sep;21(3):202-18 - PubMed
  41. Depress Anxiety. 2004;20(2):92-7 - PubMed
  42. BMC Public Health. 2015 Aug 01;15:738 - PubMed
  43. J Psychosom Res. 2001 Nov;51(5):697-704 - PubMed
  44. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):348-62 - PubMed
  45. Gerontologist. 2006 Aug;46(4):503-13 - PubMed
  46. Stress Health. 2016 Aug;32(3):201-15 - PubMed
  47. J Occup Environ Med. 2011 Feb;53(2):139-45 - PubMed
  48. J Occup Health Psychol. 2003 Jul;8(3):209-19 - PubMed
  49. J Adv Nurs. 2006 Sep;55(6):778-87 - PubMed

Publication Types