Display options
Share it on

Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 05;10(1):4136. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59713-w.

Exploring non-linear transition pathways in social-ecological systems.

Scientific reports

Jean-Denis Mathias, John M Anderies, Jacopo Baggio, Jennifer Hodbod, Sylvie Huet, Marco A Janssen, Manjana Milkoreit, Michael Schoon

Affiliations

  1. Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, UR LISC, F-63178, Aubière, France. [email protected].
  2. School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Wrigley Hall, 800 Cady Mall 108, Tempe, AZ, 85281, United States of America.
  3. School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, United States.
  4. Center for Behavior, Institutions and the Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, United States.
  5. School of Politics, Security and International Affairs, University of Central Florida, Orlando, 32816, United States.
  6. Sustainable Coastal System Cluster, National Center for Integrated Coastal Research, University of Central Florida, Orlando, 32816, United States.
  7. Department of Community Sustainability, Michigan State University, 480 Wilson Road Room 310 B, East Lansing, MI, 48824, United States of America.
  8. Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, UR LISC, F-63178, Aubière, France.
  9. Department of Political Science, Purdue University, 100 N University Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, United States of America.

PMID: 32139800 PMCID: PMC7058029 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59713-w

Abstract

Tipping point dynamics are fundamental drivers for sustainable transition pathways of social-ecological systems (SES). Current research predominantly analyzes how crossing tipping points causes regime shifts, however, the analysis of potential transition pathways from these social and ecological tipping points is often overlooked. In this paper, we analyze transition pathways and the potential outcomes that these may lead to via a stylized model of a system composed of interacting agents exploiting resources and, by extension, the overall ecosystem. Interactions between the social and the ecological system are based on a perception-exploitation framework. We show that the presence of tipping points in SES may yield counter-intuitive social-ecological transition pathways. For example, the high perception of an alarming ecological state among agents can provide short-term ecological benefits, but can be less effective in the long term, compared to a low-perception condition. This work also highlights how understanding non-linear interactions is critical for defining suitable transition pathways of any SES.

References

  1. Liu, J. et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317, 1513–1516 (2007). - PubMed
  2. Folke, C. et al. Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31, 437–440 (2002). - PubMed
  3. Turner, B. L. et al. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, 8074–8079 (2003). - PubMed
  4. An, L. Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models. Ecological Modelling229, 25–36 (2012). Modeling Human Decisions. - PubMed
  5. Pahl-Wostl, C. et al. Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society 12 (2007). - PubMed
  6. Scheffer, M. et al. Anticipating critical transitions. Science 338, 344–348 (2012). - PubMed
  7. Filatova, T., Polhill, J. G. & van Ewijk, S. Regime shifts in coupled socioenvironmental systems: Review of modelling challenges and approaches. Environmental Modelling & Software 75, 333–347 (2016). - PubMed
  8. Scheffer, M. & Carpenter, S. R. Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18, 648–656 (2003). - PubMed
  9. Folke, C. et al. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35, 557–581 (2004). - PubMed
  10. Lenton, T. M. & Williams, H. T. On the origin of planetary-scale tipping points. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28, 380–382 (2013). - PubMed
  11. Carpenter, S. R., Brock, W. A., Folke, C., van Nes, E. H. & Scheffer, M. Allowing variance may enlarge the safe operating space for exploited ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, 14384–14389 (2015). - PubMed
  12. Milkoreit, M. et al. Defining tipping points for social-ecological systems scholarshipâan interdisciplinary literature review. Environmental Research Letters 3, 033005 (2018). - PubMed
  13. Bossel, H. & Strobel, M. Experiments with an âintelligentâ world model. Futures 10, 191–212 (1978). - PubMed
  14. Janssen, M. & de Vries, B. The battle of perspectives: a multi-agent model with adaptive responses to climate change. Ecological Economics 26, 43–65 (1998). - PubMed
  15. Castilla-Rho, J. C. et al. Social tipping points in global groundwater management. Nature Human Behaviour 1, 640–649 (2017). - PubMed
  16. Jager, W., Janssen, M., Vries, H. D., Greef, J. D. & Vlek, C. Behaviour in commons dilemmas: Homo economicus and homo psychologicus in an ecological-economic model. Ecological Economics 35, 357–379 (2000). - PubMed
  17. Schlüter, M. et al. A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems. Ecological Economics 131, 21–35 (2017). - PubMed
  18. Horan, R. D., Fenichel, E. P., Drury, K. L. S. & Lodge, D. M. Managing ecological thresholds in coupled environmental–human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 7333–7338 (2011). - PubMed
  19. Richter, A. & Dakos, V. Profit fluctuations signal eroding resilience of natural resources. Ecological Economics 117, 12–21 (2015). - PubMed
  20. Bauch, C. T., Sigdel, R., Pharaon, J. & Anand, M. Early warning signals of regime shifts in coupled human–environment systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 14560–14567 (2016). - PubMed
  21. Clark, C. The economics of overexploitation. Science 181, 630–634 (1973). - PubMed
  22. Clark, C. & Gordon, R. The economics of fishing and modern capital theory: a simplified approach. Journal of environmental economics and management 2, 92–106 (1975). - PubMed
  23. Walters, C. Adaptive management of renewable resources. (New-York: McGraw Hill., 1986). - PubMed
  24. Schelling, T. Micromotives and Macrobehavior (UK: Cambridge Univ Press, 1978). - PubMed
  25. Granovetter, M. Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology 83, 489–515 (1978). - PubMed
  26. Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G. & Faure, T. How can extremism prevail? a study based on the relative agreement interaction model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5 (2002). - PubMed
  27. Hegselmann, R. & Krause, U. Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5, art. 2 (2002). - PubMed
  28. Mathias, J.-D., Huet, S. & Deffuant, G. An energy-like indicator to assess opinion resilience. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 473, 501–510 (2017). - PubMed
  29. Mathias, J.-D., Huet, S. & Deffuant, G. Bounded confidence model with fixed uncertainties and extremists: The opinions can keep fluctuating indefinitely. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 19, 6 (2016). - PubMed
  30. Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1957). - PubMed
  31. Baggio, J. A. & Hillis, V. Managing ecological disturbances: Learning and the structure of social-ecological networks. Environmental Modelling & Software 109, 32–40 (2018). - PubMed
  32. Anderies, J. M., Mathias, J.-D. & Janssen, M. A. Knowledge infrastructure and safe operating spaces in social–ecological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2018). - PubMed
  33. Bousquet, F. et al. Simulating the interaction between a society and a renewable resource. Journal of Biological Systems 01, 199–214 (1993). - PubMed
  34. Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. Social capital and community governance*. The Economic Journal 112, F419–F436 (2002). - PubMed
  35. Castillo, D. & Saysel, A. K. Simulation of common pool resource field experiments: a behavioral model of collective action. Ecological Economics 55, 420–436 (2005). - PubMed
  36. Mathias, J.-D., Anderies, J. M. & Janssen, M. How does knowledge infrastructure mobilization influence the safe operating space of regulated exploited ecosystems? Earth’s Future 6, 1555–1567 (2018). - PubMed
  37. Westley, F. et al. Tipping toward sustainability: Emerging pathways of transformation. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 40, 762-780-19 (2011). - PubMed
  38. Jones, N. A., Shaw, S., Ross, H., Witt, K. & Pinner, B. The study of human values in understanding and managing social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 21 (2016). - PubMed
  39. Baggio, J. et al. Explaining success and failure in the commons: the configural nature of ostrom’s institutional design principles. International Journal of the Commons 10(2), 417–439 (2016). - PubMed
  40. Berkes, F. & Folke, C. Linking sociological and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. (Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA, 1998). - PubMed
  41. Young, H. P. The evolution of social norms. Annual Review of Economics 7, 359–387 (2015). - PubMed
  42. Nyborg, K. et al. Social norms as solutions. Science 354, 42–43 (2016). - PubMed
  43. Barbier, E. B. & Strand, I. Valuing mangrove-fishery linkages - a case study of campeche, mexico. Environmental and Resource Economics 12, 151–166 (1998). - PubMed
  44. Costello, C. et al. Global fishery prospects under contrasting management regimes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 5125–5129 (2016). - PubMed
  45. Sanchirico, J. N. & Wilen, J. E. Optimal spatial management of renewable resources: matching policy scope to ecosystem scale. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50, 23–46 (2005). - PubMed
  46. Fishbein, M. A theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implications. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 27, 65–116 (1979). - PubMed
  47. Gifford, R. The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. The American psychologist 66, 290–302 (2011). - PubMed
  48. Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D. & Theoret, A. The structure of "unstructured" decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly 21, 246–275 (1976). - PubMed
  49. Moser, S. C. & Ekstrom, J. A. A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 22026–22031 (2010). - PubMed
  50. Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7, 117–140 (1954). - PubMed
  51. Sherif, M. & Hovland, C. Social Judgment. Assimilation and contrast effects. Communication and attitude change (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1961). - PubMed

Publication Types