Display options
Share it on

Int J Dent. 2020 Feb 19;2020:2494128. doi: 10.1155/2020/2494128. eCollection 2020.

Bone Formation in Grafts with Bio-Oss and Autogenous Bone at Different Proportions in Rabbit Calvaria.

International journal of dentistry

Yeon Jung Kim, Carlos Eduardo Takeshi Saiki, Karoline Silva, Carlos Kiyoshi Moreira Massuda, Ana Paula de Souza Faloni, Paulo Henrique Braz-Silva, Debora Pallos, Wilson Roberto Sendyk

Affiliations

  1. Department of Implantology, University of Santo Amaro-UNISA, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  2. Department of Health Sciences, Implantology Post-Graduate Course, University Center of Araraquara-UNIARA Dental School, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
  3. Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo-USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  4. Laboratory of Virology, Institute of Tropical Medicine of São Paulo, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo-USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

PMID: 32148500 PMCID: PMC7049819 DOI: 10.1155/2020/2494128

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the volumetric stability and bone formation in grafts with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone at different proportions in rabbit calvaria.

RESULTS: Clinical analysis showed that Groups I (90.43 ± 8.99) and II (90.87 ± 7.43) had greater dimensional stability compared to Group IV (

CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the use of Bio-Oss either alone or associated with the autogenous bone at a proportion of 25% showed superior dimensional stability compared to the use of autogenous bone in the proposed experimental model.

Copyright © 2020 Yeon Jung Kim et al.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):289-98 - PubMed
  2. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Jan;111(1):e6-11 - PubMed
  3. J Oral Implantol. 2018 Feb;44(1):74-84 - PubMed
  4. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Sep;9(3):166-77 - PubMed
  5. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Apr;39(4):371-8 - PubMed
  6. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Dec;19(12):1246-53 - PubMed
  7. J Periodontol. 2013 Mar;84(3):360-70 - PubMed
  8. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 May;22(5):538-45 - PubMed
  9. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Dec;34(8):877-84 - PubMed
  10. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Aug;46(8):1045-1051 - PubMed
  11. J Dent. 2016 May;48:1-8 - PubMed
  12. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Dec;112(6):e8-15 - PubMed
  13. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 May;47(5):805-814 - PubMed
  14. Int J Implant Dent. 2017 Dec;3(1):23 - PubMed
  15. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001 Aug;21(4):395-405 - PubMed
  16. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Mar;23(3):263-73 - PubMed
  17. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Aug;22(8):857-64 - PubMed
  18. Cell Tissue Bank. 2011 Aug;12(3):171-84 - PubMed
  19. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Feb;107(2):204-11 - PubMed
  20. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Aug;46(8):1030-1038 - PubMed
  21. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Dec;39(12):1175-80 - PubMed
  22. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Nov;19(4):513-21, vi - PubMed
  23. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Jan-Feb;16(1):23-33 - PubMed
  24. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Jun;15(3):339-45 - PubMed
  25. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 May;34(3):273-80 - PubMed
  26. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jan;20(1):1-6 - PubMed
  27. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Jan-Feb;14(1):72-6 - PubMed
  28. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001 May;30(3):157-61 - PubMed
  29. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;38(4):356-62 - PubMed
  30. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 Sep-Oct;17(5):635-43 - PubMed

Publication Types