Display options
Cite
Rhee C, Klompas M. Sepsis trends: increasing incidence and decreasing mortality, or changing denominator?. J Thorac Dis. 2020;12:S89-S100doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.51.
Rhee, C., & Klompas, M. (2020). Sepsis trends: increasing incidence and decreasing mortality, or changing denominator?. Journal of thoracic disease, 12S89-S100. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.12.51
Rhee, Chanu, and Klompas, Michael. "Sepsis trends: increasing incidence and decreasing mortality, or changing denominator?." Journal of thoracic disease vol. 12 (2020): S89-S100. doi: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.12.51
Rhee C, Klompas M. Sepsis trends: increasing incidence and decreasing mortality, or changing denominator?. J Thorac Dis. 2020 Feb;12:S89-S100. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.51. PMID: 32148931; PMCID: PMC7024753.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Thorac Dis. 2020 Feb;12:S89-S100. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.51.

Sepsis trends: increasing incidence and decreasing mortality, or changing denominator?.

Journal of thoracic disease

Chanu Rhee, Michael Klompas

Affiliations

  1. Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  2. Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

PMID: 32148931 PMCID: PMC7024753 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.51

Abstract

Numerous studies suggest that the incidence of sepsis has been steadily increasing over the past several decades while mortality rates are falling. However, reliably assessing trends in sepsis epidemiology is challenging due to changing diagnosis and coding practices over time. Ongoing efforts by clinicians, administrators, policy makers, and patient advocates to increase sepsis awareness, screening, and recognition are leading to more patients being labeled with sepsis. Subjective clinical definitions and heterogeneous presentations also allow for wide discretion in diagnosing sepsis rather than specific infections alone or non-specific syndromes. These factors create a potential ascertainment bias whereby the inclusion of less severely ill patients in sepsis case counts over time leads to a perceived increase in sepsis incidence and decrease in sepsis mortality rates. Analyses that rely on administrative data alone are further confounded by changing coding practices in response to new policies, financial incentives, and efforts to improve documentation. An alternate strategy for measuring sepsis incidence, outcomes, and trends is to use objective and consistent clinical criteria rather than administrative codes or registries to identify sepsis. This is feasible using data routinely found in electronic health record systems, such as blood culture draws and sustained courses of antibiotics to identify infection and laboratory values, vasopressors, and mechanical ventilation to measure acute organ dysfunction. Recent surveillance studies using this approach suggest that sepsis incidence and mortality rates have been essentially stable over the past decade. In this review, we summarize the major epidemiologic studies of sepsis trends, potential biases in these analyses, and the recent change in the surveillance paradigm toward using objective clinical data from electronic health records to more accurately characterize sepsis trends.

2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Sepsis; incidence; surveillance; trends

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Crit Care Med. 1991 Jul;19(7):973-6 - PubMed
  2. BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 21;14:3863 - PubMed
  3. J Intensive Care. 2019 Feb 21;7:13 - PubMed
  4. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Apr;28(4):305-309 - PubMed
  5. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;37(2):163-71 - PubMed
  6. Healthc Financ Manage. 2007 Jun;61(6):44-7 - PubMed
  7. Crit Care Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):e122-30 - PubMed
  8. Crit Care. 2016 Nov 21;20(1):396 - PubMed
  9. Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;26(1):66-70 - PubMed
  10. Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):3-12 - PubMed
  11. Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):625-31 - PubMed
  12. J Infect. 2017 Nov;75(5):409-419 - PubMed
  13. N Engl J Med. 2014 May 1;370(18):1673-6 - PubMed
  14. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Nov;37(11):483-93 - PubMed
  15. Crit Care Med. 2007 May;35(5):1244-50 - PubMed
  16. Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec;47(12):e993-e998 - PubMed
  17. Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;34(11):2707-13 - PubMed
  18. JAMA. 2012 Apr 4;307(13):1405-13 - PubMed
  19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec 1;198(11):1406-1412 - PubMed
  20. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jan 1;60(1):88-95 - PubMed
  21. Crit Care. 2018 Jan 17;22(1):7 - PubMed
  22. J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Sep 2;:885066618794136 - PubMed
  23. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e187571 - PubMed
  24. Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1303-10 - PubMed
  25. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10 - PubMed
  26. Crit Care. 2009;13(1):120 - PubMed
  27. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Mar 1;40(5):719-27 - PubMed
  28. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2011 Sep;28(6):424-8 - PubMed
  29. JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1308-16 - PubMed
  30. Crit Care. 2016 Apr 06;20:89 - PubMed
  31. Crit Care Med. 2013 May;41(5):1167-74 - PubMed
  32. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 May-Jun;25(3):792-9 - PubMed
  33. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Nov;44(11):1826-1835 - PubMed
  34. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul 1;188(1):77-82 - PubMed
  35. Chest. 2006 Jun;129(6):1432-40 - PubMed
  36. Am J Med. 2013 Aug;126(8):739-743.e1 - PubMed
  37. Crit Care. 2015 Sep 14;19:338 - PubMed
  38. JAMA. 2017 Oct 3;318(13):1241-1249 - PubMed
  39. J Intensive Care Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;28(6):355-68 - PubMed
  40. Crit Care. 2003 Feb;7(1):1-2 - PubMed
  41. Chest. 1992 Jun;101(6):1644-55 - PubMed
  42. Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):754-61 - PubMed
  43. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Mar 15;62(6):695-703 - PubMed
  44. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 17;348(16):1546-54 - PubMed
  45. Nurs Adm Q. 2003 Oct-Dec;27(4):285-9 - PubMed
  46. Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):367-74 - PubMed
  47. Crit Care. 2019 Jul 3;23(1):241 - PubMed
  48. Chest. 2011 Nov;140(5):1223-1231 - PubMed
  49. J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Sep;199(3):468-75 - PubMed
  50. Am J Med Qual. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):250-8 - PubMed
  51. Crit Care Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1669-76 - PubMed
  52. N Engl J Med. 1985 Jun 20;312(25):1604-8 - PubMed
  53. Crit Care Med. 2007 Aug;35(8):1928-36 - PubMed
  54. Crit Care Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1441-2 - PubMed
  55. Crit Care Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):e113-21 - PubMed
  56. J Hosp Med. 2013 May;8(5):243-7 - PubMed
  57. Crit Care Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):1442-9 - PubMed
  58. Chest. 2017 Feb;151(2):278-285 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support