Display options
Cite
Harant D, Lang I. Stay in Touch-The Cortical ER of Moss Protonemata in Osmotic Stress Situations. Plants (Basel). 2020;9(4)doi: 10.3390/plants9040421.
Harant, D., & Lang, I. (2020). Stay in Touch-The Cortical ER of Moss Protonemata in Osmotic Stress Situations. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 9(4), . https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040421
Harant, Dominik, and Lang, Ingeborg. "Stay in Touch-The Cortical ER of Moss Protonemata in Osmotic Stress Situations." Plants (Basel, Switzerland) vol. 9,4 (2020). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040421
Harant D, Lang I. Stay in Touch-The Cortical ER of Moss Protonemata in Osmotic Stress Situations. Plants (Basel). 2020 Mar 30;9(4). doi: 10.3390/plants9040421. PMID: 32235617; PMCID: PMC7238208.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Plants (Basel). 2020 Mar 30;9(4). doi: 10.3390/plants9040421.

Stay in Touch-The Cortical ER of Moss Protonemata in Osmotic Stress Situations.

Plants (Basel, Switzerland)

Dominik Harant, Ingeborg Lang

Affiliations

  1. Core Facility Cell Imaging & Ultrastructure Research, Faculty of Life Sciences, The University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
  2. Department of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, The University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

PMID: 32235617 PMCID: PMC7238208 DOI: 10.3390/plants9040421

Abstract

Plasmolysis is usually introduced to cell biology students as a tool to illustrate the plasma membrane: hypertonic solutions cause the living protoplast to shrink by osmotic water loss; hence, it detaches from the surrounding cell wall. What happens, however, with the subcellular structures in the cell cortex during this process of turgor loss? Here, we investigated the cortical endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in moss protonema cells of

Keywords: Physcomitrella patens; actin; cortical ER; latrunculin B; moss; osmotic stress; plasmolysis

References

  1. J Cell Biol. 2019 Jan 7;218(1):83-96 - PubMed
  2. Protoplasma. 2004 Dec;224(3-4):231-43 - PubMed
  3. Ann Bot. 2008 Aug;102(2):227-45 - PubMed
  4. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012 Dec;15(6):625-31 - PubMed
  5. Trends Cell Biol. 2011 Dec;21(12):709-17 - PubMed
  6. Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82 - PubMed
  7. Biophys J. 2017 Jul 11;113(1):214-222 - PubMed
  8. Trends Plant Sci. 2017 Apr;22(4):289-297 - PubMed
  9. J Exp Bot. 2002 Aug;53(375):1699-710 - PubMed
  10. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010 Dec;13(6):731-5 - PubMed
  11. J Exp Bot. 2015 Mar;66(6):1553-63 - PubMed
  12. J Exp Bot. 2017 Jul 10;68(15):4075-4087 - PubMed
  13. Planta. 2018 Mar;247(3):663-677 - PubMed
  14. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018 Jul 1;59(7):1377-1384 - PubMed
  15. Science. 2016 Oct 28;354(6311): - PubMed
  16. Plant Cell. 2009 Dec;21(12):3937-49 - PubMed
  17. Plant Cell. 2010 Apr;22(4):1333-43 - PubMed
  18. Front Plant Sci. 2015 Jun 09;6:422 - PubMed
  19. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2017 Dec;40:89-96 - PubMed
  20. Plant Physiol. 2013 Nov;163(3):1230-41 - PubMed
  21. Cell. 2010 Nov 24;143(5):774-88 - PubMed
  22. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;997:83-93 - PubMed
  23. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017 Oct;15(10):1235-1237 - PubMed
  24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 20;115(12):E2869-E2878 - PubMed
  25. New Phytol. 2007;174(1):63-76 - PubMed
  26. Int J Mol Sci. 2014 Dec 23;16(1):1-18 - PubMed
  27. Plant Physiol. 2015 Aug;168(4):1563-72 - PubMed
  28. J Cell Biol. 2011 Apr 18;193(2):333-46 - PubMed
  29. Front Plant Sci. 2012 Jul 19;3:166 - PubMed
  30. Nat Plants. 2018 Feb;4(2):67-68 - PubMed
  31. BMC Plant Biol. 2012 May 17;12:70 - PubMed
  32. J Integr Plant Biol. 2015 Jan;57(1):50-62 - PubMed

Publication Types