Display options
Share it on

PeerJ. 2020 Mar 04;8:e8643. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8643. eCollection 2020.

Let's talk about pain catastrophizing measures: an item content analysis.

PeerJ

Geert Crombez, Annick L De Paepe, Elke Veirman, Christopher Eccleston, Gregory Verleysen, Dimitri M L Van Ryckeghem

Affiliations

  1. Deparment of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  2. Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
  3. Ghent University, Research Support Office, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.
  4. Experimental Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  5. Institute for Health and Behaviour, INSIDE, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.

PMID: 32181053 PMCID: PMC7060750 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8643

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised about whether self-report measures of pain catastrophizing reflect the construct as defined in the cognitive-behavioral literature. We investigated the content of these self-report measures; that is, whether items assess the construct 'pain catastrophizing' and not other theoretical constructs (i.e., related constructs or pain outcomes) using the discriminant content validity method.

METHOD: Items (

RESULTS: Data were analyzed using Bayesian hierarchical models. The results revealed that the items from pain-related worrying, vigilance, pain severity, distress, and disability questionnaires were distinctively related to their respective constructs. This was not observed for the items from the pain catastrophizing questionnaires. The content of the pain catastrophizing measures was equally well, or even better, captured by pain-related worrying or pain-related distress.

CONCLUSION: Based upon current findings, a recommendation may be to develop a novel pain catastrophizing questionnaire. However, we argue that pain catastrophizing cannot be assessed by self-report questionnaires. Pain catastrophizing requires contextual information, and expert judgment, which cannot be provided by self-report questionnaires. We argue for a person-centered approach, and propose to rename 'pain catastrophizing' measures in line with what is better measured: 'pain-related worrying'.

©2020 Crombez et al.

Keywords: Catastrophizing; Content validity; Pain; Questionnaires; Validity; Worrying

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

References

  1. J Pain. 2006 Apr;7(4):261-71 - PubMed
  2. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):737-45 - PubMed
  3. Clin J Pain. 2001 Mar;17(1):65-71 - PubMed
  4. Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 23;7:1270 - PubMed
  5. Pain. 2012 Aug;153(8):1560-2 - PubMed
  6. Clin J Pain. 2001 Mar;17(1):52-64 - PubMed
  7. Br J Health Psychol. 2019 Sep;24(3):477-484 - PubMed
  8. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(1):27-36 - PubMed
  9. Pain. 2007 Feb;127(3):276-86 - PubMed
  10. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Apr;114(4):551-61 - PubMed
  11. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009 May;9(5):745-58 - PubMed
  12. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Aug;69(4):655-62 - PubMed
  13. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011 Apr;7(4):216-24 - PubMed
  14. Br J Clin Psychol. 1990 Nov;29(4):383-94 - PubMed
  15. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1981 Aug;49(4):517-25 - PubMed
  16. Transl Behav Med. 2012 Mar;2(1):22-9 - PubMed
  17. Psychol Assess. 2011 Dec;23(4):1034-40; discussion 1041-6 - PubMed
  18. Pain. 2016 Aug;157(8):1607-10 - PubMed
  19. J Pain. 2015 Apr;16(4):306-17 - PubMed
  20. Patient. 2018 Feb;11(1):107-117 - PubMed
  21. Health Expect. 2017 Feb;20(1):11-23 - PubMed
  22. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;34(1):11-23 - PubMed
  23. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Feb;71(1):81-91 - PubMed
  24. Br J Health Psychol. 2017 May;22(2):295-329 - PubMed
  25. J Occup Rehabil. 2008 Dec;18(4):362-74 - PubMed
  26. Br J Health Psychol. 2014 May;19(2):240-57 - PubMed
  27. Eur J Pain. 2007 Jan;11(1):75-81 - PubMed
  28. Pain. 2015 Oct;156(10):1978-90 - PubMed
  29. J Pain. 2004 May;5(4):195-211 - PubMed
  30. Pain. 2000 Apr;85(3):317-32 - PubMed
  31. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1179-94 - PubMed
  32. J Headache Pain. 2015 Dec;16:1053 - PubMed
  33. Pain. 2019 Sep;160(9):1946-1953 - PubMed
  34. Qual Life Res. 2012 Jun;21(5):739-46 - PubMed
  35. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42 - PubMed
  36. Eur J Pain. 2009 Jul;13(6):620-8 - PubMed
  37. Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S12-21 - PubMed
  38. Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):437-55 - PubMed
  39. J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 Nov;107(4):576-86 - PubMed
  40. Pain. 2004 Feb;107(3):234-41 - PubMed
  41. J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 15;208:191-197 - PubMed
  42. Pain. 2009 Sep;145(1-2):31-5 - PubMed
  43. Behav Res Ther. 1986;24(4):461-70 - PubMed
  44. Behav Res Ther. 1993 Jan;31(1):63-73 - PubMed
  45. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):193-203 - PubMed
  46. Behav Res Ther. 2005 Aug;43(8):1055-67 - PubMed
  47. J Appl Biobehav Res. 2013 Jun;18(2):82-103 - PubMed
  48. Eur J Pain. 2004 Aug;8(4):385-94 - PubMed
  49. Pain. 1985 Dec;23(4):345-56 - PubMed
  50. F1000Res. 2017 Apr 11;6:461 - PubMed
  51. Pain. 2009 Sep;145(1-2):45-51 - PubMed
  52. Pain. 1983 Sep;17(1):33-44 - PubMed
  53. Pain. 1992 Aug;50(2):133-49 - PubMed
  54. Cogn Behav Ther. 2013;42(3):215-23 - PubMed
  55. Pain. 2007 Aug;130(3):249-53 - PubMed
  56. Eur J Pain. 2016 Nov;20(10):1573-1586 - PubMed
  57. BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527 - PubMed

Publication Types