Display options
Share it on

Asian J Neurosurg. 2020 Feb 25;15(1):107-112. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_354_19. eCollection 2020.

Reliability and Interobserver Variability of Evans' Index and Disproportionately Enlarged Subarachnoid Space Hydrocephalus as Diagnostic Criteria for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Asian journal of neurosurgery

Kiyoshi Takagi, Ryota Watahiki, Toru Machida, Kenji Onouchi, Kazuyoshi Kato, Marie Oshima

Affiliations

  1. Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Center, Kashiwatanaka Hospital, Kashiwa (Current institute: Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Center, Nagareyama Central Hospital, Nagareyama), Tsukuba, Japan.
  2. Department of Mechanical and Biofunctional Systems, Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tsukuba, Japan.
  3. Department of Rehabilitation, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan.
  4. Center for Diagnostic Radiology, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  5. Department of Neurology, Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan.
  6. Department of Surgery, Abiko Seijinkai Hospital, Abiko, Japan.

PMID: 32181182 PMCID: PMC7057886 DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_354_19

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The image diagnosis of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is based on the ventriculomegaly, whose criterion is an Evans' Index (EI) >0.3. Recently, disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus (DESH) has been proposed as a morphological characteristic to iNPH. Several studies cast doubt on the reliability of these criteria in the diagnosis of iNPH. Furthermore, interobserver differences of these criteria have not yet been investigated. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic reliability and interobserver variability of EI and DESH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images of 84 definite iNPH patients were retrospectively evaluated by a neuroradiologist (NR) and physical therapist (PT). They independently assessed the EI and DESH. The MR images were evaluated preoperatively by a neurosurgeon (NS). The results were showed in mean (standard deviation).

RESULTS: The mean age was 78.4 (6.3) years (male:female = 49:35). The mean EI was 0.33 (0.04), 0.32 (0.04), and 0.31 (0.03) for NS, NR, and PT, respectively (

CONCLUSION: This study suggests that DESH cannot be a diagnostic criterion for iNPH. If EI >0.3 and DESH were both necessary to diagnose iNPH, then more than 70% of patients would have been misdiagnosed and would have been deprived of the chance of treatment and its benefits. These results request a paradigm shift in the concepts of iNPH.

Copyright: © 2020 Asian Journal of Neurosurgery.

Keywords: Disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus; Evans' Index; idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; interobserver variability; ventriculoatrial shunt

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;25(1):37-45 - PubMed
  2. J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Dec;34:294-298 - PubMed
  3. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2019 Nov 15;59(11):436-443 - PubMed
  4. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;143:34-8 - PubMed
  5. Neurol Clin Pract. 2013 Oct;3(5):375-385 - PubMed
  6. Lancet. 1974 Jul 13;2(7872):81-4 - PubMed
  7. J Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;127(6):1436-1442 - PubMed
  8. Neurology. 2000 Jun 13;54(11):2156-8 - PubMed
  9. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2004 Apr;44(4):222-3 - PubMed
  10. J Neurol Sci. 2014 Apr 15;339(1-2):108-12 - PubMed
  11. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Dec;159(12):2293-2300 - PubMed
  12. Acta Neurol Scand. 2012 Sep;126(3):145-53 - PubMed
  13. Stroke. 2011 Jun;42(6):1546-9 - PubMed
  14. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Jun;14(6):585-94 - PubMed
  15. J Neurosurg. 1988 Jun;68(6):985-6 - PubMed
  16. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2012;52(11):775-809 - PubMed
  17. J Exp Psychol. 1970 Jul;85(1):75-82 - PubMed
  18. Eur Radiol. 2008 Nov;18(11):2678-83 - PubMed
  19. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 2010 Oct 31;7:18 - PubMed
  20. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019 Jul 1;17(1):97-102 - PubMed
  21. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016 Apr;22(2 Dementia):579-99 - PubMed
  22. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0193152 - PubMed
  23. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Oct;37(10):1831-1837 - PubMed
  24. Eur J Neurol. 2017 Mar;24(3):468-474 - PubMed
  25. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Oct;95:28-32 - PubMed
  26. Lancet. 1991 Mar 2;337(8740):535-8 - PubMed
  27. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1993;373:18-32 - PubMed
  28. Neurosurgery. 1980 Jan;6(1):1-9 - PubMed
  29. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Jan;40(1):74-79 - PubMed
  30. J Neurol Sci. 2009 Feb 15;277(1-2):54-7 - PubMed
  31. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Nov;39(11):2022-2026 - PubMed
  32. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998 Aug;19(7):1277-84 - PubMed

Publication Types