Display options
Share it on

Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2019 Dec 03;53(4):379-384. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2019.37097. eCollection 2019.

The Effectiveness of Preoperative Ultrasonography and Scintigraphy in the Pathological Gland Localization in Primary Hyperparathyroidism Patients.

Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni

Nurcihan Aygün, Adnan İşgör, Mehmet Uludağ

Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Health Sciences University, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  2. Department of General Surgery, Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

PMID: 32377112 PMCID: PMC7192300 DOI: 10.14744/SEMB.2019.37097

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) is a common disease, and its curative treatment is surgical. Nowadays, preoperative localization studies have become standard before surgical treatment, and the first stage imaging methods are ultrasonography and/or scintigraphy. With the contribution of these studies to the localization of the pathological gland, focused surgery has become the first standard of choice. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonography and scintigraphy in the preoperative localization of the pathologic gland or glands in patients who underwent surgical treatment and cure for pHPT.

METHODS: In this study; the data of the biochemically diagnosed pHPT patients, who had Tc 99m-MIBI scintigraphy and/or ultrasonography for localisation preoperatively, were evaluated retrospectively. The lesion, which was positive in USG or scintigraphy for localization, was evaluated according to the neck side or neck quadrant, and the results were compared with intraoperative localization findings. The effectiveness of both methods and combinations was evaluated with the localization rates, sensitivity and positive predictive values (PPV). The three methods were compared with the Youden index (J).

RESULTS: The mean age of 380 patients included in this study was 54.8±12.8 years (20-83). Three hundred eight of them were female, and 72 were male. Scintigraphy was performed in 339 patients, USG was performed in 344 patients, and both USG and scintigraphy were performed in 306 patients. One hundred twenty patients (32%) underwent bilateral neck exploration (BNE), and 260 patients (68.4%) underwent minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) (unilateral exploration or focused surgery). Single adenoma was detected in 358 (94%), double adenoma in 10 (3%) and hyperplasia in 12 (3%) patients.Localization rates of USG, scintigraphy, USG and scintigraphy combinations were 53%, 74%, 75%; their sensitivity was 56%, 85%, 89%; PPDs were 90%, 86%, 83%. The efficiency of scintigraphy is higher than USG (J: 0.743 vs 0.527). The contribution of scintigraphy to USG in combination with USG was limited (J: 0.743 vs 0.754).The localization rates of USG, scintigraphy, USG and scintigraphy combinations were 46%, 64%, 66%; their sensitivity was 51%, 83%, 88%; PPDs were 79%, 74%, 73%. The efficiency of scintigraphy is higher than that of USG (J: 0.64 vs 0.427). The contribution of scintigraphy to USG in combination with USG was limited (J: 0.64 vs 0.66).

CONCLUSION: In patients with pHPT, scintigraphy is a more effective method for USG as the first step preoperative imaging and should be preferred as the first method if there is no contraindication. A combination of scintigraphy with USG may contribute minimally to the efficacy of scintigraphy. It may be advantageous for early detection of the pathologic gland in patients with incompatible two imaging and initiating surgery on the positive side of the first scintigraphy. Scintigraphy and USG methods may allow successful MRP surgery in the majority of patients with pHPT.

Copyright: © 2019 by The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital.

Keywords: Gland localisation; Primary hyperparathyroidism; scintigraphy; ultrsonography

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared.

References

  1. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Feb;101(2):97-102 - PubMed
  2. Endocr Pract. 2016 Sep;22(9):1062-7 - PubMed
  3. J Bone Miner Res. 2002 Nov;17 Suppl 2:N2-11 - PubMed
  4. Clin Nucl Med. 2017 Dec;42(12):e491-e497 - PubMed
  5. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975 Aug;141(2):242-4 - PubMed
  6. Adv Surg. 2018 Sep;52(1):137-153 - PubMed
  7. Minerva Endocrinol. 2018 Jun;43(2):133-143 - PubMed
  8. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Oct;99(10):3561-9 - PubMed
  9. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2017 Feb;68(1):47-55 - PubMed
  10. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2018 Feb;26(1):151-166 - PubMed
  11. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Apr 30;286(6375):1384-6 - PubMed
  12. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Feb;19(2):577-83 - PubMed
  13. Surgery. 2018 Apr 23;: - PubMed
  14. J Clin Ultrasound. 2005 Jul-Aug;33(6):283-7 - PubMed
  15. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006 Jul;65(1):106-13 - PubMed
  16. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Sep;84(9):1745-51 - PubMed
  17. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):1924-1934 - PubMed
  18. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Apr 1;114(7):593-7 - PubMed
  19. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Feb;94(2):335-9 - PubMed
  20. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009 Sep;394(5):765-84 - PubMed
  21. J Ultrason. 2017 Mar;17(68):17-22 - PubMed
  22. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008 Sep;393(5):659-66 - PubMed
  23. Adv Surg. 2012;46:171-89 - PubMed
  24. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Mar;98(3):902-12 - PubMed
  25. J Ultrasound Med. 2009 Feb;28(2):183-90 - PubMed
  26. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Dec;32(6):847-859 - PubMed
  27. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013 Sep-Oct;34(5):508-16 - PubMed
  28. Am J Surg. 2007 Feb;193(2):155-9 - PubMed
  29. Minerva Endocrinol. 2017 Sep;42(3):213-222 - PubMed
  30. Surgery. 2006 Dec;140(6):856-63; discussion 863-5 - PubMed
  31. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009 Sep;394(5):785-98 - PubMed
  32. Ann Nucl Med. 2014 Oct;28(8):725-35 - PubMed

Publication Types