Display options
Share it on

J Clin Med. 2020 May 06;9(5). doi: 10.3390/jcm9051355.

The Use of a Virtual Reality Platform for the Assessment of the Memory Decline and the Hippocampal Neural Injury in Subjects with Mild Cognitive Impairment: The Validity of Smart Aging Serious Game (SASG).

Journal of clinical medicine

Monia Cabinio, Federica Rossetto, Sara Isernia, Francesca Lea Saibene, Monica Di Cesare, Francesca Borgnis, Stefania Pazzi, Tommaso Migliazza, Margherita Alberoni, Valeria Blasi, Francesca Baglio

Affiliations

  1. IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, via Capecelatro 66, 20148 Milan, Italy.
  2. Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica medica (CBIM), 27100 Pavia, Italy.

PMID: 32384591 PMCID: PMC7290592 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051355

Abstract

Due to the lack of pharmacological treatment for dementia, timely detection of subjects at risk can be of seminal importance for preemptive rehabilitation interventions. The aim of the study was to determine the usability of the smart aging serious game (SASG), a virtual reality platform, in assessing the cognitive profile of an amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) population, its validity in discriminating aMCI from healthy controls (HC), and in detecting hippocampal degeneration, a biomarker of clinical progression towards dementia. Thirty-six aMCI and 107 HC subjects were recruited and administered the SASG together with a neuropsychological evaluation. All aMCI and 30 HC subjects performed also an MRI for hippocampal volume measurement. Results showed good usability of the SASG despite the low familiarity with technology in both groups. ROC curve analyses showed similar discriminating abilities for SASG and gold standard tests, and a greater discrimination ability compared to non-specific neuropsychological tests. Finally, linear regression analysis revealed that the SASG outperformed the Montreal cognitive assessment test (MoCA) in the ability to detect neuronal degeneration in the hippocampus on the right side. These data show that SASG is an ecological task, that can be considered a digital biomarker providing objective and clinically meaningful data about the cognitive profile of aMCI subjects.

Keywords: Alzheimer disease; MRI; cognitive rehabilitation; computerized assessment; dementia; digital biomarker; hippocampus; mild cognitive impairment; serious game; virtual reality

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 22;7(1):16000 - PubMed
  2. J Clin Med. 2019 Apr 05;8(4): - PubMed
  3. Front Neurol. 2020 May 06;11:354 - PubMed
  4. Funct Neurol. 2014 Oct-Dec;29(4):255-62 - PubMed
  5. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019 Jan;22(1):3-6 - PubMed
  6. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Apr 17;10:653-60 - PubMed
  7. Neurology. 1999 Apr 22;52(7):1397-403 - PubMed
  8. BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):425 - PubMed
  9. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Oct 07;6:264 - PubMed
  10. Ann Neurol. 1980 May;7(5):486-8 - PubMed
  11. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1996 Aug;17(4):305-9 - PubMed
  12. Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 25;8:1243 - PubMed
  13. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98 - PubMed
  14. Neurol Sci. 2015 Apr;36(4):585-91 - PubMed
  15. Neurology. 2018 Jan 16;90(3):126-135 - PubMed
  16. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Mar 17;7:24 - PubMed
  17. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2015 Sep-Oct;23(5):368-76 - PubMed
  18. Arch Neurol. 2007 Aug;64(8):1130-8 - PubMed
  19. Neurol Sci. 2015 Feb;36(2):209-14 - PubMed
  20. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 May;20(5):468-77 - PubMed
  21. Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 1;44(1):83-98 - PubMed
  22. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2009 Jul;16(4):401-18 - PubMed
  23. Intern Med. 2015;54(8):895-902 - PubMed
  24. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Dec 05;8:405 - PubMed
  25. Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):270-9 - PubMed
  26. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2010 Jul-Sep;24(3):284-90 - PubMed
  27. Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 5;9(1):5690 - PubMed
  28. Neuroimage. 2015 Jul 15;115:117-37 - PubMed
  29. Neurology. 2007 Mar 13;68(11):828-36 - PubMed
  30. Data Brief. 2018 Aug 30;20:864-869 - PubMed
  31. Front Neurol. 2019 Jan 11;9:1040 - PubMed
  32. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Mar 24;6:54 - PubMed
  33. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;44(4):1333-47 - PubMed
  34. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2277-81 - PubMed
  35. Funct Neurol. 2014 Jul-Sep;29(3):153-8 - PubMed
  36. Neuroimage. 1999 Feb;9(2):179-94 - PubMed
  37. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;22(1):285-94 - PubMed
  38. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jun;13(6):614-29 - PubMed
  39. Neuron. 2002 Aug 15;35(4):625-41 - PubMed
  40. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-62 - PubMed
  41. JMIR Serious Games. 2013 Aug 06;1(1):e1 - PubMed
  42. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2017 Feb 2;7(1):15-29 - PubMed
  43. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9 - PubMed
  44. Neuron. 2002 Jan 31;33(3):341-55 - PubMed
  45. Neurobiol Aging. 2010 Jul;31(7):1099-106 - PubMed
  46. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Nov 21;9:379 - PubMed
  47. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 09;8(4):e61483 - PubMed
  48. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 23;172(8):666-8 - PubMed
  49. JAMA. 2014 Dec 17;312(23):2551-61 - PubMed
  50. Neurol Sci. 2011 Dec;32(6):1057-62 - PubMed
  51. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Apr;50(5):592-602 - PubMed
  52. Neurology. 2007 Apr 17;68(16):1268-73 - PubMed
  53. J Biomed Inform. 2016 Dec;64:296-319 - PubMed
  54. Neurology. 2018 Aug 21;91(8):373-374 - PubMed
  55. Neurobiol Aging. 2010 Jul;31(7):1077-88 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support