Display options
Share it on

Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 Mar 12;5(2):243-255. doi: 10.1002/lio2.370. eCollection 2020 Apr.

mTOR inhibitor use in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis on survival, tumor response, and toxicity.

Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology

Jaimin Patel, Shaun A Nguyen, Besim Ogretmen, Jorge S Gutkind, Cherie-Ann Nathan, Terry Day

Affiliations

  1. Head and Neck Tumor Center, Hollings Cancer Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.
  2. Moores Cancer Center, Department of Pharmacology University of California San Diego La Jolla California USA.
  3. Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Feist-Weiller Cancer Cancer, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Lousiana State University Health Center Shreveport Louisiana USA.

PMID: 32337356 PMCID: PMC7178455 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.370

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has been rising in incidence primarily related to HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers. Novel molecular therapeutics are evolving with the mTOR pathway as a new target. Previous studies have shown variable outcomes with relatively low toxicity. This study reports the tumor response, survivability, and toxicity of mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) in HNSCC. Despite expanding research on this pathway, there remains controversy around mTORi use for treatment of HNSCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies were included if: (a) Used mTORi alone or in combination with other treatment modalities in HNSCC. (b) Site of cancer included were one of the following: nasopharyngeal, oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx. (c) All stages of cancer and treatment stage (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative) were included. The rate of adverse events (AEs), tumor response, progression free survival, and overall survival were meta-analyzed.

RESULTS: From 1299 publications only 11 studies met inclusion criteria with a combined 232 total patients treated. Two studies used mTORi neoadjuvantly, five adjuvantly, and four in palliative/unresectable/metastatic setting. Monotherapeutic mTORi resulted in stabilization of disease (52.5%), but partial response was the most common response when mTORi were combined with chemotherapy and/or radiation (CRT) (48.1%). Survival rate was the highest in the mTORi combined with CRT. Hyperglycemia of any grade was the most commonly reported toxicity while grade 3 or less AEs were the most common grade of toxicity.

CONCLUSION: The use of mTORi as monotherapy in HNSCC has thus far not yielded significant tumor response, however, in combination with other agents, an improved partial tumor response is evident that may or may not be associated with the addition of mTORi. Although adverse events were common, grade 4/5 AEs were uncommon. Further prospective, randomized clinical trials are necessary to confirm the direct roles of these agents in HNSCC tumor response.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2a.

© 2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Triological Society.

Keywords: head and neck cancer; head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; mTOR inhibitors; oral cancer; oropharyngeal cancer; outcomes

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88 - PubMed
  2. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Feb 15;25(4):1156-1164 - PubMed
  3. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2015 Oct;36(10):1163-9 - PubMed
  4. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(1):71-81 - PubMed
  5. Oral Oncol. 2013 May;49(5):461-7 - PubMed
  6. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29 - PubMed
  7. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 10;29(32):4294-301 - PubMed
  8. Cancer. 2014 Dec 15;120(24):3940-51 - PubMed
  9. Cancer. 2018 Jul 1;124(13):2785-2800 - PubMed
  10. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018 Apr;124:11-20 - PubMed
  11. Nat Chem Biol. 2012 Oct;8(10):831-8 - PubMed
  12. Ann Oncol. 2015 Jul;26(7):1476-80 - PubMed
  13. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41 - PubMed
  14. Bioelectrochemistry. 2018 Oct;123:248-254 - PubMed
  15. Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86 - PubMed
  16. Cancer Med. 2013 Dec;2(6):862-71 - PubMed
  17. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2017;17(2):152-163 - PubMed
  18. Nat Cell Biol. 2007 Mar;9(3):316-23 - PubMed
  19. Oncotarget. 2016 May 10;7(19):27055-66 - PubMed
  20. Head Neck. 2016 Dec;38(12):1759-1764 - PubMed
  21. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug;15(8):510-527 - PubMed
  22. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 Jul;70(1):121-8 - PubMed
  23. Head Neck. 2010 Dec;32(12):1619-28 - PubMed
  24. J Oral Pathol Med. 2016 May;45(5):319-28 - PubMed
  25. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Dec 15;15(24):7658-7665 - PubMed
  26. Cancer Discov. 2013 Jul;3(7):722-5 - PubMed
  27. Cancer Res. 2005 Nov 1;65(21):9953-61 - PubMed
  28. Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Sep 1;10(17):5820-7 - PubMed
  29. Cancer. 2013 May 15;119(10):1823-31 - PubMed
  30. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 28;9(4):e95219 - PubMed
  31. Cells. 2019 Apr 09;8(4): - PubMed
  32. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jan;30(1):67-74 - PubMed
  33. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;54(10):1046-55 - PubMed
  34. Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2533-2538 - PubMed
  35. Cancer Res. 2007 Mar 1;67(5):2160-8 - PubMed
  36. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jan;28(1):64-74 - PubMed
  37. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Feb 11;20(3): - PubMed
  38. Cancer Res. 2013 Mar 15;73(6):1733-41 - PubMed
  39. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Nov 1;87(3):479-86 - PubMed
  40. Ann Oncol. 2015 Mar;26(3):561-7 - PubMed
  41. N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 9;354(6):567-78 - PubMed

Publication Types