Open Access Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 02;12:67-71. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S236038. eCollection 2020.
Major Differences in the Use of Protocols for Dispatcher-Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Among ILCOR Member Countries.
Open access emergency medicine : OAEM
Stinne Eika Rasmussen, Mette Amalie Nebsbjerg, Katrine Bjørnshave Bomholt, Lise Qvirin Krogh, Kristian Krogh, Jonas Agerlund Povlsen, Bo Løfgren
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, NE 8200, Denmark.
- Center for Health Sciences Education, Aarhus University, Aarhus, NE 8200, Denmark.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, NE 8200, Denmark.
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, NE 8200, Denmark.
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, NE 8200, Denmark.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Regional Hospital of Randers, Randers, NE 8930, Denmark.
PMID: 32308508
PMCID: PMC7135133 DOI: 10.2147/OAEM.S236038
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE: Dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) increases the rate of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). DA-CPR is recommended by resuscitation councils globally and it has been shown that the general public expects to receive pre-arrival instructions while waiting for help. A scientific advisory from the American Heart Association identifies standardized and structured DA-CPR protocols as important to increase bystander CPR rates. This study aims to investigate whether different International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) member countries use DA-CPR protocols and to compare protocol contents between countries.
METHODS: All resuscitation councils forming ILCOR were inquired by email to provide a copy of their DA-CPR protocol, and to state whether this protocol was used by all emergency dispatch centers in their country. The collected protocols were translated into English, and content was compared.
RESULTS: A total of 60 countries were contacted (response rate: 83%). Of these, 46% stated to have a nationwide protocol, 30% reported to use local protocols, and 24% did not use a protocol. Overall, 54% provided a copy of their protocol. All translated protocols asked the rescuer to check for responsiveness and breathing, 35% to activate phone speaker function, half contained notes about agonal breathing and 59% included notes about integrating an automated external defibrillator.
CONCLUSION: Almost one quarter of ILCOR member countries did not use a protocol for DA-CPR. Half of the protocols included notes about agonal breathing. Activation of phone speaker function and protocolled encouragements during CPR were rarely included.
© 2020 Rasmussen et al.
Keywords: bystander; cardiac arrest; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; dispatcher
Conflict of interest statement
Professor Bo Løfgren is a member of the ILCOR Basic Life Support Task Force (2017–2020). The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- Resuscitation. 2013 Jul;84(7):979-81 - PubMed
- Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S414-35 - PubMed
- Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000 Jul-Sep;4(3):234-7 - PubMed
- J Emerg Med. 2014 Mar;46(3):363-70 - PubMed
- Circulation. 2012 Jan 31;125(4):648-55 - PubMed
- Resuscitation. 2012 Apr;83(4):494-9 - PubMed
- Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;14(10):877-83 - PubMed
- Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:e1-31 - PubMed
- Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:81-99 - PubMed
- Circulation. 2013 Mar 26;127(12):1342-50 - PubMed
- Resuscitation. 2014 Jan;85(1):34-41 - PubMed
- Resuscitation. 2008 Oct;79(1):97-102 - PubMed
- Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Jan;3(1):63-81 - PubMed
- Resuscitation. 2014 Jan;85(1):124-30 - PubMed
- Resuscitation. 2011 Dec;82(12):1496-500 - PubMed
- Resuscitation. 2009 Jul;80(7):769-72 - PubMed
- Circulation. 1991 May;83(5):1832-47 - PubMed
- Resuscitation. 2017 Jan;110:74-80 - PubMed
- Emerg Med J. 2013 Aug;30(8):657-61 - PubMed
Publication Types