Display options
Share it on

Obes Sci Pract. 2019 Dec 10;6(2):162-170. doi: 10.1002/osp4.390. eCollection 2020 Apr.

The cost-effectiveness of pharmacotherapy and lifestyle intervention in the treatment of obesity.

Obesity science & practice

Minyi Lee, Brianna N Lauren, Tiannan Zhan, Jin Choi, Matthew Klebanoff, Barham Abu Dayyeh, Elsie M Taveras, Kathleen Corey, Lee Kaplan, Chin Hur

Affiliations

  1. Gastroenterology Division Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts.
  2. Institute for Technology Assessment Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts.
  3. Department of General Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York.
  4. Healthcare Innovation Research and Evaluation Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York.
  5. Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut.
  6. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota.
  7. Department of Pediatrics Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts.
  8. Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts.

PMID: 32313674 PMCID: PMC7156872 DOI: 10.1002/osp4.390

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Food and Drug Administration has approved several pharmacotherapies for the treatment of obesity. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of six pharmacotherapies and lifestyle intervention for people with mild obesity (body mass indices [BMIs] 30 to 35).

METHODS: A microsimulation model was constructed to compare seven weight loss strategies plus no treatment: intensive lifestyle intervention, orlistat, phentermine, phentermine/topiramate, lorcaserin, liraglutide, and semaglutide. Weight loss, quality-of-life scores, and costs were estimated using clinical trials and other published literature. Endpoints included costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100 000/QALY. Results were analysed at 1-, 3-, and 5-year time horizons.

RESULTS: At each of the three follow-up periods, phentermine was the cost-effective strategy, with ICERs of $46 258/QALY, $20 157/QALY, and $17 880/QALY after 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Semaglutide was the most effective strategy in the 3- and 5-year time horizons, with total QALYs of 2.224 and 3.711, respectively. However, the ICERs were prohibitively high at $1 437 340/QALY after 3 years and $576 931/QALY after 5 years. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated these results were robust.

CONCLUSIONS: Phentermine is the cost-effective pharmacologic weight-loss strategy. Although semaglutide is the most effective, it is not cost-effective because of its high price.

© 2019 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, World Obesity and The Obesity Society.

Keywords: cost‐effectiveness analysis; obesity; pharmacotherapy; weight loss

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Hur received consulting fees from Novo Nordisk outside the submitted work. Dr Corey received consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Novo Nordisk, and Gilead outside the submitted work and grant

References

  1. N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 28;371(9):796-7 - PubMed
  2. Lancet. 2018 Aug 25;392(10148):637-649 - PubMed
  3. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):11-22 - PubMed
  4. Gastroenterology. 2017 May;152(7):1765-1779 - PubMed
  5. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019 Apr;27(4):591-602 - PubMed
  6. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Sep;21(9):1923-34 - PubMed
  7. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Jun;36(6):843-54 - PubMed
  8. Clin Obes. 2019 Apr;9(2):e12294 - PubMed
  9. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 15;363(3):245-56 - PubMed
  10. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Dec;19(12):2351-60 - PubMed
  11. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jan;1411(1):106-119 - PubMed
  12. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005 Aug;29(8):975-82 - PubMed
  13. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Nov 14;10:791-803 - PubMed
  14. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010 Aug;11(12):1971-82 - PubMed
  15. Lancet. 2011 Apr 16;377(9774):1341-52 - PubMed
  16. Diabetes Ther. 2018 Jun;9(3):951-961 - PubMed
  17. Value Health. 2008 May-Jun;11(3):478-86 - PubMed
  18. Med Clin North Am. 2018 Jan;102(1):135-148 - PubMed
  19. Yonsei Med J. 2006 Oct 31;47(5):614-25 - PubMed
  20. N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1834-1844 - PubMed
  21. Circulation. 2012 Apr 3;125(13):1695-703 - PubMed
  22. BMJ. 2014 May 14;348:g2646 - PubMed
  23. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Feb;95(2):297-308 - PubMed
  24. Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S102-38 - PubMed
  25. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Sep 27;170(17):1566-75 - PubMed
  26. J Health Econ. 2012 Jan;31(1):219-30 - PubMed
  27. Diabetes Care. 2012 Apr;35(4):723-30 - PubMed
  28. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Jul;33(7):699-706 - PubMed
  29. Lancet. 2009 Nov 7;374(9701):1606-16 - PubMed
  30. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Jan;31(1):189-96 - PubMed
  31. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Feb;100(2):342-62 - PubMed
  32. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Nov;21(11):2163-71 - PubMed
  33. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):w822-31 - PubMed
  34. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Jan;22(1):5-13 - PubMed
  35. JAMA. 1999 Jan 20;281(3):235-42 - PubMed
  36. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 May 26;53(21):1925-32 - PubMed
  37. Metabolism. 2019 Mar;92:170-192 - PubMed
  38. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2006 Dec;3(3):202-15 - PubMed
  39. JAMA Surg. 2017 Feb 1;152(2):136-141 - PubMed
  40. Med Decis Making. 2013 Feb;33(2):176-97 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support