Display options
Cite
Siedner MJ, Kraemer JD, Meyer MJ, et al. Access to primary healthcare during lockdown measures for COVID-19 in rural South Africa: a longitudinal cohort study. medRxiv. 2020;doi: 10.1101/2020.05.15.20103226.
Siedner, M. J., Kraemer, J. D., Meyer, M. J., Harling, G., Mngomezulu, T., Gabela, P., Dlamini, S., Gareta, D., Majozi, N., Ngwenya, N., Seeley, J., Wong, E., Iwuji, C., Shahmanesh, M., Hanekom, W., & Herbst, K. (2020). Access to primary healthcare during lockdown measures for COVID-19 in rural South Africa: a longitudinal cohort study. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.15.20103226
Siedner, Mark J, et al. "Access to primary healthcare during lockdown measures for COVID-19 in rural South Africa: a longitudinal cohort study." medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences vol. (2020). doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.15.20103226
Siedner MJ, Kraemer JD, Meyer MJ, Harling G, Mngomezulu T, Gabela P, Dlamini S, Gareta D, Majozi N, Ngwenya N, Seeley J, Wong E, Iwuji C, Shahmanesh M, Hanekom W, Herbst K. Access to primary healthcare during lockdown measures for COVID-19 in rural South Africa: a longitudinal cohort study. medRxiv. 2020 May 20; doi: 10.1101/2020.05.15.20103226. PMID: 32511504; PMCID: PMC7273272.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

medRxiv. 2020 May 20; doi: 10.1101/2020.05.15.20103226.

Access to primary healthcare during lockdown measures for COVID-19 in rural South Africa: a longitudinal cohort study.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences

Mark J Siedner, John D Kraemer, Mark J Meyer, Guy Harling, Thobeka Mngomezulu, Patrick Gabela, Siphephelo Dlamini, Dickman Gareta, Nomathamsanqa Majozi, Nothando Ngwenya, Janet Seeley, Emily Wong, Collins Iwuji, Maryam Shahmanesh, Willem Hanekom, Kobus Herbst

PMID: 32511504 PMCID: PMC7273272 DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.15.20103226

Abstract

Objectives Public health interventions designed to interrupt COVID-19 transmission could have deleterious impacts on primary healthcare access. We sought to identify whether implementation of the nationwide lockdown (shelter-in-place) order in South Africa affected ambulatory clinic visitation in rural Kwa-Zulu Natal (KZN). Design Prospective, longitudinal cohort study Setting Data were analyzed from the Africa Health Research Institute Health and Demographic Surveillance System, which includes prospective data capture of clinic visits at eleven primary healthcare clinics in northern KwaZulu-Natal Participants A total of 36,291 individuals made 55,545 clinic visits during the observation period. Exposure of Interest We conducted an interrupted time series analysis with regression discontinuity methods to estimate changes in outpatient clinic visitation from 60 days before through 35 days after the lockdown period. Outcome Measures Daily clinic visitation at ambulatory clinics. In stratified analyses we assessed visitation for the following sub-categories: child health, perinatal care and family planning, HIV services, non-communicable diseases, and by age and sex strata. Results We found no change in total clinic visits/clinic/day from prior to and during the lockdown (-6.9 visits/clinic/day, 95%CI -17.4, 3.7) or trends in clinic visitation over time during the lockdown period (-0.2, 95%CI -3.4, 3.1). We did detect a reduction in child healthcare visits at the lockdown (-7.2 visits/clinic/day, 95%CI -9.2, -5.3), which was seen in both children <1 and children 1-5. In contrast, we found a significant increase in HIV visits immediately after the lockdown (8.4 visits/clinic/day, 95%CI 2.4, 14.4). No other differences in clinic visitation were found for perinatal care and family planning, non-communicable diseases, or among adult men and women. Conclusions In rural KZN, the ambulatory healthcare system was largely resilient during the national-wide lockdown order. A major exception was child healthcare visitation, which declined immediately after the lockdown but began to normalize in the weeks thereafter. Future work should explore efforts to decentralize chronic care for high-risk populations and whether catch-up vaccination programs might be required in the wake of these findings.

References

  1. BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 11;18(1):172 - PubMed
  2. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 May;4(5):e10-e11 - PubMed
  3. Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e271-e278 - PubMed
  4. Nat Commun. 2019 Dec 2;10(1):5482 - PubMed
  5. J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Dec 02;38(4):673-678 - PubMed
  6. BMJ. 2009 Nov 19;339:b4571 - PubMed
  7. Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;37(5):956-62 - PubMed
  8. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 May;26(5):976-984 - PubMed
  9. Science. 2015 Mar 13;347(6227):1240-2 - PubMed
  10. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):546 - PubMed
  11. BMJ. 2015 Jun 09;350:h2750 - PubMed
  12. PLoS Med. 2016 Aug 02;13(8):e1002096 - PubMed
  13. Lancet. 2010 Oct 16;376(9749):1339-46 - PubMed
  14. Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Dec 1;174(11):1246-55 - PubMed
  15. JAMA. 2007 Aug 8;298(6):644-54 - PubMed
  16. Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):841-842 - PubMed
  17. Epidemiol Infect. 2009 May;137(5):654-61 - PubMed
  18. Nature. 2005 Sep 8;437(7056):209-14 - PubMed
  19. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jul;8(7):e901-e908 - PubMed
  20. N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 31;374(13):1281-7 - PubMed
  21. Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):871-877 - PubMed
  22. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;93:233-236 - PubMed
  23. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 May 15;69(19):591-593 - PubMed
  24. Health Econ. 2010 Nov;19(11):1345-60 - PubMed
  25. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Apr;13(4):e006631 - PubMed
  26. Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Apr;5(4):e448-e457 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support