Display options
Cite
Simon A, Lazarowski L, Singletary M, et al. A Review of the Types of Training Aids Used for Canine Detection Training. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:313doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00313.
Simon, A., Lazarowski, L., Singletary, M., Barrow, J., Van Arsdale, K., Angle, T., Waggoner, P., & Giles, K. (2020). A Review of the Types of Training Aids Used for Canine Detection Training. Frontiers in veterinary science, 7313. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00313
Simon, Alison, et al. "A Review of the Types of Training Aids Used for Canine Detection Training." Frontiers in veterinary science vol. 7 (2020): 313. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00313
Simon A, Lazarowski L, Singletary M, Barrow J, Van Arsdale K, Angle T, Waggoner P, Giles K. A Review of the Types of Training Aids Used for Canine Detection Training. Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jun 05;7:313. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00313. eCollection 2020. PMID: 32596267; PMCID: PMC7301692.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jun 05;7:313. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00313. eCollection 2020.

A Review of the Types of Training Aids Used for Canine Detection Training.

Frontiers in veterinary science

Alison Simon, Lucia Lazarowski, Melissa Singletary, Jason Barrow, Kelly Van Arsdale, Thomas Angle, Paul Waggoner, Kathleen Giles

Affiliations

  1. AGS Forensics, LLC, Washington, DC, United States.
  2. Canine Performance Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
  3. Federal Bureau of Investigation Laboratory, Quantico, VA, United States.
  4. Giles Consulting, LLC, Huntington Beach, CA, United States.

PMID: 32596267 PMCID: PMC7301692 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00313

Abstract

The canine detection community is a diverse one, ranging from scientific fields such as behavior, genetics, veterinary medicine, chemistry, and biology to applications in law enforcement, military, medicine, and agricultural/environmental detection. This diversity has allowed for a flourishing and innovative community, yet it has also led to little acceptance and agreement on terminology. This is especially true when discussing the variety of training aids used in olfactory-based exercises. In general, authentic materials and pseudo-scents are the most commonly discussed, with the former accepted widely for training and certification, and the latter more often disregarded. However, as advances are made in the creation of training materials, alternative training aids are being introduced that do not fit into either of these categories. The misconceptions surrounding how these alternative training aids are manufactured has led to confusion on their classification, and therefore their reliance as an effective tool. This manuscript will review the existing language surrounding canine training aids, address relevant research revealing effectiveness, and clarify the different types based on their manufacture, chemical nature, and fundamental function.

Copyright © 2020 Simon, Lazarowski, Singletary, Barrow, Van Arsdale, Angle, Waggoner and Giles.

Keywords: canine detection; non-pseudo alternatives; pseudos; terminology; training aids

References

  1. Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Sep;242:242-254 - PubMed
  2. J Chromatogr Sci. 2002 Mar;40(3):147-55 - PubMed
  3. Chem Senses. 2020 Apr 17;45(3):179-186 - PubMed
  4. J Forensic Sci. 2019 Mar;64(2):587-592 - PubMed
  5. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2003 Aug;376(8):1212-24 - PubMed
  6. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011 Sep;401(4):1295-307 - PubMed
  7. Heliyon. 2018 Dec 08;4(12):e00947 - PubMed
  8. Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Jun;251:107-14 - PubMed
  9. J Econ Entomol. 2008 Aug;101(4):1389-96 - PubMed
  10. Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Jul 10;220(1-3):118-25 - PubMed
  11. Talanta. 2017 Jun 1;168:320-328 - PubMed
  12. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014 Dec;406(30):7817-25 - PubMed
  13. Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Dec;257:257-270 - PubMed
  14. Anim Cogn. 2015 Nov;18(6):1255-65 - PubMed
  15. J Forensic Sci. 2006 Jul;51(4):780-9 - PubMed
  16. J Chromatogr A. 2012 Sep 14;1255:202-6 - PubMed
  17. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014 Dec;10(4):570-82 - PubMed
  18. Forensic Sci Int. 2010 Jun 15;199(1-3):103-8 - PubMed
  19. Animals (Basel). 2019 Sep 19;9(9): - PubMed
  20. Forensic Sci Int. 2009 Apr 15;186(1-3):6-13 - PubMed
  21. Forensic Sci Int. 2010 Feb 25;195(1-3):132-8 - PubMed
  22. Gut. 2011 Jun;60(6):814-9 - PubMed
  23. Front Vet Sci. 2019 Apr 09;6:98 - PubMed
  24. Data Brief. 2015 Oct 23;5:653-706 - PubMed
  25. J Chromatogr A. 2016 Jun 17;1451:83-90 - PubMed
  26. Anal Chim Acta. 2010 Dec 3;682(1-2):9-22 - PubMed
  27. BMC Urol. 2014 Feb 27;14:22 - PubMed
  28. Anim Cogn. 2011 May;14(3):387-94 - PubMed
  29. J Forensic Sci. 2011 Jul;56(4):866-81 - PubMed
  30. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2007 Feb 1;846(1-2):86-97 - PubMed
  31. J Forensic Sci. 2001 Sep;46(5):1014-24 - PubMed
  32. J Chromatogr A. 2012 Jun 29;1244:28-36 - PubMed
  33. Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 21;8(1):4958 - PubMed
  34. Talanta. 2019 Dec 1;205:120127 - PubMed
  35. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 21;7(1):9019 - PubMed
  36. Talanta. 2005 Aug 15;67(2):313-27 - PubMed
  37. Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Jun 15;209(1-3):133-42 - PubMed
  38. Behav Processes. 2015 Jan;110:37-46 - PubMed

Publication Types