Display options
Cite
, Bragard C, Dehnen-Schmutz K, et al. Pest categorisation of potato virus Y (non-EU isolates). EFSA J. 2020;18(1):e05938doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5938.
, Bragard, C., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Gonthier, P., Jacques, M. A., Jaques Miret, J. A., Justesen, A. F., MacLeod, A., Magnusson, C. S., Milonas, P., Navas-Cortes, J. A., Parnell, S., Potting, R., Reignault, P. L., Thulke, H. H., van der Werf, W., Civera, A. V., Yuen, J., Zappalà, L., Candresse, T., Lacomme, C., Bottex, B., Oplaat, C., Roenhorst, A., Schenk, M., & Di Serio, F. (2020). Pest categorisation of potato virus Y (non-EU isolates). EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 18(1), e05938. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5938
, et al. "Pest categorisation of potato virus Y (non-EU isolates)." EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority vol. 18,1 (2020): e05938. doi: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5938
, Bragard C, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Gonthier P, Jacques MA, Jaques Miret JA, Justesen AF, MacLeod A, Magnusson CS, Milonas P, Navas-Cortes JA, Parnell S, Potting R, Reignault PL, Thulke HH, van der Werf W, Civera AV, Yuen J, Zappalà L, Candresse T, Lacomme C, Bottex B, Oplaat C, Roenhorst A, Schenk M, Di Serio F. Pest categorisation of potato virus Y (non-EU isolates). EFSA J. 2020 Jan 09;18(1):e05938. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5938. eCollection 2020 Jan. PMID: 32626492; PMCID: PMC7008826.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

EFSA J. 2020 Jan 09;18(1):e05938. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5938. eCollection 2020 Jan.

Pest categorisation of potato virus Y (non-EU isolates).

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority

Claude Bragard, Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz, Paolo Gonthier, Marie-Agnès Jacques, Josep Anton Jaques Miret, Annemarie Fejer Justesen, Alan MacLeod, Christer Sven Magnusson, Panagiotis Milonas, Juan A Navas-Cortes, Stephen Parnell, Roel Potting, Philippe Lucien Reignault, Hans-Hermann Thulke, Wopke van der Werf, Antonio Vicent Civera, Jonathan Yuen, Lucia Zappalà, Thierry Candresse, Christophe Lacomme, Bernard Bottex, Carla Oplaat, Annelien Roenhorst, Martijn Schenk, Francesco Di Serio

PMID: 32626492 PMCID: PMC7008826 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5938

Abstract

Following a request from the EU Commission, the Panel on Plant Health has addressed the pest categorisation of non-EU isolates of potato virus Y (PVY). The information currently available on geographical distribution, biology, epidemiology, potential entry pathways and potential additional impact of non-EU isolates of PVY, has been evaluated with regard to the criteria to qualify as a potential Union quarantine pest. Because non-EU isolates of PVY are absent from the EU, they do not meet one of the requirements to be regulated as a regulated non-quarantine pest (RNQP) (presence in the EU); as a consequence, the Panel decided not to evaluate the other RNQP criteria for these isolates. Populations of PVY can be subdivided into several strains and groups of isolates: strain C (PVY-C), strain N (PVY-N), strain O (PVY-O) and a wide range of recombinant isolates (PVY-recombinants) which have a worldwide distribution (including the EU). Two groups of isolates, i.e. the Brazilian (PVY-Br) and Chilean (PVY-Ch) isolates, are considered absent from the EU. Non-EU isolates of PVY-C, PVY-N, PVY-O and PVY-recombinants identified so far are not expected to have an additional impact in the EU compared to the PVY isolates already present and, therefore, do not meet the corresponding criterion to qualify as a potential Union quarantine pest. The Panel is unable to conclude on the potential additional impact of isolates of PVY-Br and PVY-Ch in the EU territory, but these isolates meet all the other criteria to qualify as potential Union quarantine pests.

© 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

Keywords: European Union; Non‐EU isolate; PVY; pest risk; plant health; plant pest; quarantine

References

  1. Plant Dis. 2010 Dec;94(12):1384-1397 - PubMed
  2. Arch Virol. 2011 Dec;156(12):2273-8 - PubMed
  3. Plant Dis. 2006 Jul;90(7):935-940 - PubMed
  4. Plant Dis. 2003 Aug;87(8):955-959 - PubMed
  5. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50631 - PubMed
  6. Plant Dis. 2017 Jan;101(1):20-28 - PubMed
  7. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2001;39:157-86 - PubMed
  8. J Gen Virol. 1998 Aug;79 ( Pt 8):2037-42 - PubMed
  9. Phytopathology. 2011 Jul;101(7):778-85 - PubMed
  10. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1993;31:375-402 - PubMed
  11. Arch Virol. 2008;153(1):1-13 - PubMed
  12. Plant Dis. 1997 May;81(5):481-484 - PubMed
  13. Virology. 2017 Jul;507:40-52 - PubMed
  14. J Econ Entomol. 2012 Jun;105(3):783-91 - PubMed
  15. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2013;51:571-86 - PubMed
  16. Mol Plant Pathol. 2013 Jun;14(5):439-52 - PubMed
  17. Virology. 2015 May;479-480:46-51 - PubMed
  18. Mol Plant Pathol. 2010 Jan;11(1):161-8 - PubMed
  19. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012 Jun;76(2):159-216 - PubMed
  20. Arch Virol. 2008;153(3):517-25 - PubMed
  21. Phytopathology. 2004 Aug;94(8):868-74 - PubMed
  22. Phytopathology. 2011 Mar;101(3):377-87 - PubMed
  23. Mol Plant Pathol. 2011 Dec;12(9):938-54 - PubMed
  24. Arch Virol. 2011 Mar;156(3):473-7 - PubMed
  25. Phytopathology. 2011 Sep;101(9):1052-60 - PubMed
  26. Arch Virol. 2018 Jan;163(1):23-32 - PubMed

Publication Types