Display options
Share it on

Endosc Ultrasound. 2020 Nov-Dec;9(6):392-396. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_42_20.

Learning curve for EUS-guided biliary drainage: What have we learned?.

Endoscopic ultrasound

Amy Tyberg, Avantika Mishra, Maggie Cheung, Prashant Kedia, Monica Gaidhane, Cassandra Craig, Paul R Tarnasky, Jose Celso Ardengh, Michel Kahaleh

Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastroenterology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
  2. Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  3. Hospital das Clinicas da FMRPUSP, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

PMID: 32687074 PMCID: PMC7811715 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_42_20

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: EUS-guided-biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is an efficacious and safe option for patients who fail ERCP. EUS-BD is a technically challenging procedure. The aim of this study was to define the learning curve for EUS-BD.

METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing EUS-BD by a single operator were included for a prospective registry over 6 years. Demographics, procedural information, adverse events, and follow-up data were collected. Nonlinear regression and CUSUM analyses were conducted for the learning curve. Technical success was defined as successful stent placement. Clinical success was defined as resolution of jaundice and/or at least a 30% reduction in the pretreatment bilirubin level within a week after placement or normalization of bilirubin within 30 days.

RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included in the study (53% male, mean age 67 years). Technical success was achieved in 69 patients (96%). Clinical success was achieved in 59/69 patients (86%). Seven patients (10%) had adverse events including bleeding (n = 6) and liver abscess (n = 1). The median procedural time was 59 min (range 36-138 min). This was achieved at the 32

CONCLUSION: Endoscopists experienced in EUS-BD are expected to achieve a reduction in procedural time over successive cases, with efficiency reached at 59 min and a learning rate of 32 cases. Continued improvement is demonstrated with additional experience, with mastery suggested after approximately 100 cases.

Keywords: CUSUM; ERCP; EUS-guided; EUS-guided biliary drainage; biliary drainage; biliary stricture; learning curve

Conflict of interest statement

None

References

  1. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Dec;84(6):941-946 - PubMed
  2. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Dec;76(6):1133-41 - PubMed
  3. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Aug;10(8):920-4 - PubMed
  4. Dig Endosc. 2018 Jan;30(1):38-47 - PubMed
  5. Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Mar;61(3):684-703 - PubMed
  6. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 21;21(3):820-8 - PubMed
  7. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;7(2):94-102 - PubMed
  8. Endoscopy. 2015 Sep;47(9):794-801 - PubMed
  9. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 21;22(15):3945-51 - PubMed
  10. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1218-27 - PubMed
  11. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Feb;83(2):401-3 - PubMed
  12. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Dec;72(6):1175-84, 1184.e1-3 - PubMed
  13. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:680753 - PubMed
  14. Endoscopy. 2001 Oct;33(10):898-900 - PubMed
  15. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 21;22(3):1297-303 - PubMed
  16. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010 Sep;17(5):611-6 - PubMed
  17. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan;10(1):42-53 - PubMed
  18. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr;101(4):892-7 - PubMed
  19. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jan;96(3):e5154 - PubMed
  20. Endosc Ultrasound. 2018 Jan-Feb;7(1):4-9 - PubMed

Publication Types