Display options
Share it on

Anaesthesia. 2020 Dec;75(12):1683. doi: 10.1111/anae.15123. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

Being filmed by patients: do we have a choice?.

Anaesthesia

S Elliott, R Kearsley, K Stacey, F Plaat, L Hamlyn

Affiliations

  1. Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK.

PMID: 32588431 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15123

[No abstract available.]

References

  1. Ivermee C, Yentis SM. Attitudes of postnatal women and maternity staff towards audio recording of consent discussions. Anaesthesia 2019; 74: 1095-100. - PubMed
  2. von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [2012] ECHR 228. 2012. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-109029 (accessed 13/05/2020). - PubMed
  3. NHS National Services Scotland. Social Media Policy. November 2017. https://nhsnss.org/media/2795/b1830-social-media-policy.pdf (accessed 13/05/2020). - PubMed
  4. Yentis SM, Shinde S, Bogod D, et al. Audio/visual recording of doctors in hospitals. Anaesthesia 2020; 75: 1082-85. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types