Display options
Share it on

Ecol Evol. 2020 May 20;10(12):6059-6077. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6350. eCollection 2020 Jun.

Runaway brain-culture coevolution as a reason for larger brains: Exploring the "cultural drive" hypothesis by computer modeling.

Ecology and evolution

Alexander V Markov, Mikhail A Markov

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Biology Moscow State University Moscow Russia.
  2. Paleontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow Russia.

PMID: 32607213 PMCID: PMC7319167 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6350

Abstract

Scale and tempo of brain expansion in the course of human evolution implies that this process was driven by a positive feedback. The "cultural drive" hypothesis suggests a possible mechanism for the runaway brain-culture coevolution wherein high-fidelity social learning results in accumulation of cultural traditions which, in turn, promote selection for still more efficient social learning. Here we explore this evolutionary mechanism by means of computer modeling. Simulations confirm its plausibility in a social species in a socio-ecological situation that makes the sporadic invention of new beneficial and cognitively demanding behaviors possible. The chances for the runaway brain-culture coevolution increase when some of the culturally transmitted behaviors are individually beneficial while the others are group-beneficial. In this case, "cultural drive" is possible under varying levels of between-group competition and migration. Modeling implies that brain expansion can receive additional boost if the evolving mechanisms of social learning are costly in terms of brain expansion (e.g., rely on complex neuronal circuits) and tolerant to the complexity of information transferred, that is, make it possible to transfer complex skills and concepts easily. Human language presumably fits this description. Modeling also confirms that the runaway brain-culture coevolution can be accelerated by additional positive feedback loops via population growth and life span extension, and that between-group competition and cultural group selection can facilitate the propagation of group-beneficial behaviors and remove maladaptive cultural traditions from the population's culture, which individual selection is unable to do.

© 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords: brain expansion; cultural drive; human evolution; simulation; social learning

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 5;370(1663):20140062 - PubMed
  2. BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Sep 20;11:261 - PubMed
  3. Am J Hum Biol. 1992;4(2):179-195 - PubMed
  4. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Jul;3(7):1048-1056 - PubMed
  5. J R Soc Interface. 2015 Jan 6;12(102):20141067 - PubMed
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 2;99(7):4436-41 - PubMed
  7. Physiol Rev. 2017 Apr;97(2):699-720 - PubMed
  8. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Mar 19;371(1690): - PubMed
  9. Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 19;281(1782):20133245 - PubMed
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7908-7914 - PubMed
  11. Nat Commun. 2016 May 31;7:11693 - PubMed
  12. Science. 2010 Apr 9;328(5975):208-13 - PubMed
  13. J Anat. 2008 Apr;212(4):426-54 - PubMed
  14. Science. 2011 Nov 4;334(6056):697-700 - PubMed
  15. Nat Commun. 2015 Jan 13;6:6029 - PubMed
  16. Evol Anthropol. 2015 Mar-Apr;24(2):73-83 - PubMed
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Nov 7;103(45):16823-8 - PubMed
  18. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Nov 8;14(11):e1006504 - PubMed
  19. J Evol Biol. 2001 Jan 8;14(1):22-33 - PubMed
  20. Ann Hum Biol. 2009 Sep-Oct;36(5):562-72 - PubMed
  21. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):639-48 - PubMed
  22. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 May;16(5):277-84 - PubMed
  23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 27;101(30):10895-900 - PubMed
  24. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2091-6 - PubMed
  25. J Hum Evol. 1997 Jun;32(6):593-605 - PubMed
  26. Nature. 2018 May;557(7706):554-557 - PubMed
  27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7775-7781 - PubMed
  28. Science. 2009 Oct 2;326(5949):74e1-8 - PubMed
  29. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 5;104(23):9736-40 - PubMed
  30. J Theor Biol. 2007 May 7;246(1):129-35 - PubMed
  31. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002;Suppl 35:36-62 - PubMed
  32. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Nov;1(11):1699-1705 - PubMed
  33. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004;Suppl 39:118-64 - PubMed
  34. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 6;115(6):E1108-E1116 - PubMed
  35. Am J Physiol. 1981 Sep;241(3):R203-12 - PubMed
  36. Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e30 - PubMed
  37. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2171-80 - PubMed
  38. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 29;110(5):1584-91 - PubMed
  39. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 May;9(5):250-7 - PubMed
  40. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):603-20 - PubMed
  41. Curr Biol. 2013 Sep 9;23(17):R736-40 - PubMed
  42. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Oct 14;46P4:579-590 - PubMed
  43. Elife. 2019 Jan 31;8: - PubMed
  44. J Hum Evol. 2006 Nov;51(5):480-9 - PubMed
  45. Evolution. 2007 Dec;61(12):2811-21 - PubMed
  46. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 23;99(15):10221-6 - PubMed
  47. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 1;107(22):10002-7 - PubMed
  48. Sci Am. 1985 Oct;253(4):164-73 - PubMed
  49. Evol Hum Behav. 2001 Mar;22(2):113-142 - PubMed
  50. Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Aug 22;277(1693):2559-64 - PubMed
  51. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Dec;19(12):627-33 - PubMed
  52. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004 Jun;124(2):109-23 - PubMed
  53. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7790-7797 - PubMed

Publication Types