Display options
Share it on

J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2020 Jul 28;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s43141-020-00048-4.

Prioritization of Mur family drug targets against A. baumannii and identification of their homologous proteins through molecular phylogeny, primary sequence, and structural analysis.

Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology

Gizachew Muluneh Amera, Rameez Jabeer Khan, Rajat Kumar Jha, Amita Pathak, Jayaraman Muthukumaran, Amit Kumar Singh

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biotechnology, School of Engineering and Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, UP, 201310, India.
  2. Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.
  3. Department of Biotechnology, School of Engineering and Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, UP, 201310, India. [email protected].

PMID: 32725318 PMCID: PMC7387395 DOI: 10.1186/s43141-020-00048-4

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) report stated that Acinetobacter baumannii had been classified as one of the most important pathogenic bacteria causing nosocomial infection in hospital patients due to multi-drug resistance (MDR). It is vital to find out new bacterial drug targets and annotated their structure and function for the exploration of new anti-bacterial agents. The present study utilized a systematic route to prioritize the potential drug targets that belong to Mur family of Acinetobacter baumannii and identify their homologous proteins using a computational approach such as sequence similarity search, multiple sequence alignment, phylogenetic analysis, protein sequence, and protein structure analysis.

RESULTS: From the results of protein sequence analysis of eight Mur family proteins, they divided into three main enzymatic classes namely transferases (MurG, MurA and MraY), ligases (MurC, MurD, MurE, and MurF), and oxidoreductase (MurB). Based on the results of intra-comparative protein sequence analysis and enzymatic classification, we have chosen MurB, MurE, and MurG as the prioritized drug targets from A. baumannii and subjected them for further detailed studies of inter-species comparison. This inter-species comparison help us to explore the sequential and structural properties of homologous proteins in other species and hence, opens a gateway for new target identification and using common inhibitor for different bacterial species caused by various diseases. The pairwise sequence alignment results between A. baumannii's MurB with A. calcoaceticus's MurB, A. baumannii's MurE with A. seifertii's MurE, and A. baumannii's MurG with A. pittii's MurG showed that every group of the proteins are highly similar with each other and they showed sequence identity of 95.7% and sequence similarity of 97.2%.

CONCLUSION: Together with the results of secondary and three-dimensional structure predictions explained that three selected proteins (MurB, MurE, and MurG) from A. baumannii and their related proteins (AcMurB, AsMurE, and ApMurG) belong to mixed αβ class and they are very similar.

Keywords: 3D structure; Acinetobacter baumannii; Drug targets Secondary structure; Molecular phylogeny; Primary sequence

References

  1. Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Jun 1;35(6):1547-1549 - PubMed
  2. Proteins. 2009;77 Suppl 9:114-22 - PubMed
  3. Future Microbiol. 2014;9(6):773-89 - PubMed
  4. Bioinformatics. 2010 Jul 1;26(13):1608-15 - PubMed
  5. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2019 Dec 12;:1-23 - PubMed
  6. Comput Biol Chem. 2018 Jun;74:115-122 - PubMed
  7. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017 Jan;30(1):409-447 - PubMed
  8. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jul 2;46(W1):W296-W303 - PubMed
  9. J Chem Inf Model. 2015 Nov 23;55(11):2324-37 - PubMed
  10. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D257-60 - PubMed
  11. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008 Jul;21(3):538-82 - PubMed
  12. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2018 Mar;25(3):586-596 - PubMed
  13. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2016 Nov;34(11):2399-417 - PubMed
  14. Biochemistry. 2008 Aug 26;47(34):8919-28 - PubMed
  15. Trends Genet. 2000 Jun;16(6):276-7 - PubMed
  16. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D277-80 - PubMed
  17. Nature. 1992 Mar 5;356(6364):83-5 - PubMed
  18. Microb Pathog. 2020 Apr 28;147:104205 - PubMed
  19. Eur J Biochem. 1998 May 15;254(1):154-9 - PubMed
  20. Drug Discov Today. 2019 Mar;24(3):814-822 - PubMed
  21. J Biosci Bioeng. 2018 Feb;125(2):251-257 - PubMed
  22. J Biol Chem. 2001 Apr 6;276(14):10999-1006 - PubMed
  23. J Mol Biol. 1996 Nov 22;264(1):121-36 - PubMed
  24. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2015 Mar;95(2):95-111 - PubMed
  25. Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 17;8(1):10755 - PubMed
  26. Microbes Environ. 2011;26(2):101-12 - PubMed
  27. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D388-93 - PubMed
  28. Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 22;6:39787 - PubMed
  29. J Biomol NMR. 1996 Dec;8(4):477-86 - PubMed
  30. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402 - PubMed
  31. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D413-D418 - PubMed
  32. Protein Sci. 1993 Sep;2(9):1511-9 - PubMed
  33. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3783714 - PubMed
  34. Structure. 1996 Jan 15;4(1):47-54 - PubMed
  35. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Feb 19;9:104 - PubMed

Publication Types